<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><transcript><text start="0.12" dur="8.52">I just recently did a video about os2 1.3 which 
had a UI that shared remarkable resemblance  </text><text start="8.64" dur="7.68">to Windows 3.x being both a child of IBM and 
Microsoft the latter was in the best position  </text><text start="16.32" dur="7.68">to bring their Windows software over to os2 and 
so they did with Microsoft Word Excel and even  </text><text start="24" dur="8.04">the windows 3.0 applets today we&amp;#39;re gonna look 
at an early version of Windows NT but did you  </text><text start="32.04" dur="7.86">know that Windows NT actually merged from os2 
and was rumored to become anti os2 version 3.  </text><text start="40.74" dur="6.54">it&amp;#39;s obsolete technology no one uses today 
but I&amp;#39;ll bring it back to life I&amp;#39;m the Vintage  </text><text start="47.28" dur="10.44">collector and these are my stories [Music] when 
digging around when willpc.com I stumbled across  </text><text start="57.72" dur="7.86">this interesting bit here the presentation manager 
add-on for Windows NT in case you&amp;#39;re not familiar  </text><text start="65.58" dur="8.22">with the presentation manager that was the name 
of the graphical UI of os2 release 1.1 through 1.3  </text><text start="74.88" dur="7.62">now why would Microsoft support the os2 
presentation manager on Windows NT as the  </text><text start="82.5" dur="10.26">PM package is only offered from Windows and T 3.51 
and NT 4.0 I&amp;#39;m giving it a shot with NT 3.51 first  </text><text start="93.72" dur="6.48">my guinea pig is the expert 286 machine that 
was previously featured on this video here  </text><text start="100.92" dur="6.72">I don&amp;#39;t want to fiddle around with 22 floppy 
disks so I took a CD-ROM version and copied the  </text><text start="107.64" dur="10.14">i386 folder onto the hard drive to perform a local 
disk to disk install you&amp;#39;ll find given nt.exe in  </text><text start="117.78" dur="8.88">the i386 directory it offers various options even 
to create a floppy disk set but we&amp;#39;re not gonna  </text><text start="126.66" dur="9.3">do that instead I&amp;#39;ll run with nt.exe with the 
slash B parameter for a direct install during  </text><text start="135.96" dur="7.8">this era Windows NT was still installable directly 
from dos so here we see the initial preparation  </text><text start="143.76" dur="7.38">routine which will eventually perform a reboot 
before it comes up in the actual NT driven setup  </text><text start="152.04" dur="6.42">this one again will perform some file copying 
actions so we get to see yet another progress  </text><text start="158.46" dur="7.8">bar before we finally hit the graphical UI not 
without going through yet another reboot of course  </text><text start="167.46" dur="8.16">and this is where the madness began as I forgot 
to connect the mouse so I did reset reconnected  </text><text start="175.62" dur="8.04">the mouse only to find this message on the next 
reboot oh well I should have known better Windows  </text><text start="183.66" dur="8.7">NT 3.x did obviously not yet feature resuming 
capabilities for the OS setup so I went back to  </text><text start="192.36" dur="7.68">Dawson rerun with nt.exe which in fact claimed 
to clean up some temporary installation files  </text><text start="200.04" dur="6.48">hence I ran through the same procedure once 
again eventually even getting to see some of  </text><text start="206.52" dur="9.66">the GUI setup but wait a second it didn&amp;#39;t ask me 
anything not even to set a new password I don&amp;#39;t  </text><text start="216.18" dur="7.68">know what exactly setup is doing here but I have 
a bad feeling about it and I stand confirmed once  </text><text start="223.86" dur="7.32">the system rebooted I do get a login prompt but as 
I have no credentials I&amp;#39;m essentially stuck here  </text><text start="231.84" dur="7.44">so all good things are three I went to wipe 
Drive C completely and start over again but  </text><text start="239.28" dur="7.08">eventually I end up on the graphical UI as 
I had expected in the first place if only I  </text><text start="246.36" dur="6.54">didn&amp;#39;t bail out from it before but at least you 
get to see the third file copying progress bar  </text><text start="253.44" dur="7.62">as if the two before weren&amp;#39;t enough already and 
finally we end up on the login screen again which  </text><text start="261.06" dur="8.88">this time admits me into this system if you knew 
windows 3.x then Windows NT 3.51 will look very  </text><text start="269.94" dur="6.18">familiar except that it comes with another 
accessory group for the administrative tools  </text><text start="277.08" dur="6.9">from here you can manage your system uses the hard 
drives have a look at the system performance and  </text><text start="283.98" dur="9.24">even diagnose your system now if you&amp;#39;re wondering 
why NT started only with release 3.1 and why there  </text><text start="293.22" dur="8.22">was no releases 1.0 or 2.0 here&amp;#39;s the answer 
Microsoft intentionally released Windows nt7  </text><text start="301.44" dur="7.38">workstation has released 3.1 to put it on par 
with the then current dos based Windows 3.1  </text><text start="310.02" dur="6.66">that was not the only reason if anything they 
claimed that there was no previous release of  </text><text start="316.68" dur="7.68">Windows NT is not fully correct at least in a 
broader sense it is correct that windows and T  </text><text start="324.36" dur="7.92">is for the most new operating system development 
mostly driven by David N Cutler of deck Fame  </text><text start="332.28" dur="8.7">whom developed the VMS operating system as a 
consequence Windows NT Builds on many fundamental  </text><text start="340.98" dur="9.06">Design Concepts found in VMS but that&amp;#39;s only half 
the story Windows NT included various subsystems  </text><text start="350.04" dur="7.8">or operating system personalities four at the 
very beginning to run classic 16-bit Windows  </text><text start="357.84" dur="9.24">applications Through the Windows on Windows 
subsystem dos applications yrd dos vdm posix text  </text><text start="367.08" dur="8.88">mode applications so basically a unique subset 
and finally 16-bit os2 text mode applications  </text><text start="377.76" dur="6.96">it would be wrong to say that Windows NT is built 
on those two technology but in the broader of all  </text><text start="384.72" dur="7.92">senses one may think of os2 releases one point x 
still as being a precursor to NT to add to this  </text><text start="392.64" dur="6.96">claim many resources State and when Microsoft 
and IBM parted ways from their previous joint  </text><text start="399.6" dur="8.64">development on os2 rbn went on to developers to 
release 2.x whereas Microsoft took what once was  </text><text start="408.24" dur="8.34">called ntos2 that&amp;#39;s also the reason why do is 
to subsystem in Windows NT is limited to the  </text><text start="416.58" dur="8.34">release 1.x as Microsoft had the source code only 
for that and not the later os2 release 2 branch  </text><text start="425.76" dur="9.24">and to come back to the reason why NT launched 
as release 3.1 os2 released 2.x was already out  </text><text start="435" dur="8.52">at the time when NT 3.1 came along so it was only 
natural to put the version 3 in here to say hey  </text><text start="443.52" dur="7.44">we&amp;#39;re one ahead and while NT eventually ended up 
being something entirely different he took some  </text><text start="450.96" dur="8.7">Heritage alone not only the os2 sub-system but 
also support for os2&amp;#39;s hbfs the high performance  </text><text start="459.66" dur="8.04">file system but on a timeline perspective this 
all happened in the period of around 1988 to 1993.  </text><text start="467.7" dur="6.96">now it&amp;#39;s interesting the Microsoft released the 
presentation manager add-on for Windows NT only  </text><text start="474.66" dur="8.88">for NT 3.51 which came in May 1995 so roughly 
four months before the release of windows 95.  </text><text start="484.2" dur="8.52">and again for Windows NT 4.0 coming in 1996 the 
presentation manager addon was also made available  </text><text start="494.04" dur="5.52">to my best knowledge though there was never 
a version of the presentation manager for NT  </text><text start="499.56" dur="7.44">3.1 or at least none that is available and 
documented who makes it interesting though  </text><text start="507" dur="9.06">is that os2 was surely not strategic anymore for 
Microsoft in 1995 except maybe for one reason to  </text><text start="516.06" dur="7.92">win over a deal for certain customers whom have 
previously invested into os2 1.x and should be  </text><text start="523.98" dur="7.74">given a transitional option that&amp;#39;s the only 
reason I can imagine why this add-on exists  </text><text start="531.72" dur="6.24">it comes on five floppies and as opposed to other 
markers of products it doesn&amp;#39;t really look very  </text><text start="537.96" dur="6.72">polished as it features only this very basic 
text mode batch installer and while it seems a  </text><text start="544.68" dur="5.82">bit weird seeing how is too fast being installed 
into Windows you&amp;#39;ll end up with a new program  </text><text start="550.5" dur="8.04">group for the PM subsystem in program manager as 
usual reboot is required to get it up and running  </text><text start="559.38" dur="5.4">as opposed to the real os2 which had 
its own application launcher this is  </text><text start="564.78" dur="5.58">fully replaced with the Windows NT program 
manager and the icons appear here as shown  </text><text start="571.14" dur="6.78">but you have to be aware that the PM shell has to 
be running as otherwise if you try running just  </text><text start="577.92" dur="7.2">any random applet you&amp;#39;ll get this error so just be 
sure to run the PM Shell First and you&amp;#39;ll be fine  </text><text start="586.14" dur="6">running the PM shell just like this will switch 
over to another desktop where you won&amp;#39;t find much  </text><text start="592.98" dur="6.24">as opposed to the real os2 where you&amp;#39;d have 
the desktop manager kind of the similar thing  </text><text start="599.22" dur="6">to the windows program manager to launch your 
applications this is totally absent when running  </text><text start="605.22" dur="8.58">an NT it&amp;#39;s no big deal to run your applications 
from Windows program manager however if you intend  </text><text start="613.8" dur="5.76">to start multiple applications you&amp;#39;d be always 
jumping forward and back between the two desktop  </text><text start="619.56" dur="6.6">environments which you can do by simply clicking 
the small Windows NT icon on the lower right  </text><text start="627.12" dur="7.68">not exactly the way I&amp;#39;d Define usability it&amp;#39;s a 
pity they didn&amp;#39;t invest into seamless windowing  </text><text start="634.8" dur="6.66">mode kind of similar as to what os2 did with 
Windows 3.x applications in later releases  </text><text start="641.46" dur="7.98">to have them appear on the native desktop now the 
install disk for the presentation manager includes  </text><text start="649.44" dur="7.08">a readme file which gives also some hints on 
installing the real os2 file manager which  </text><text start="656.52" dur="7.92">unfortunately is not included with the package 
of course Windows NT has its own file manager  </text><text start="664.44" dur="7.62">but as a comparison I took the os2 file manager 
and copied the files over manually I&amp;#39;ll also  </text><text start="672.06" dur="7.56">create the program icon Windows own program exe 
already provides some icons though I believe none  </text><text start="679.62" dur="9.42">is suitable let&amp;#39;s see eventy&amp;#39;s own winfolder DXE 
has something more appealing okay this one looks  </text><text start="689.04" dur="6.78">decent let&amp;#39;s fire them up both and have them side 
by side this is really awesome don&amp;#39;t you think</text><text start="698.16" dur="7.2">last time when I played around with os2 1.3 I 
went into installing the os2 presentation manager  </text><text start="705.36" dur="6.78">versions of Microsoft&amp;#39;s word in Excel let&amp;#39;s see 
how good the compatibility of the os2 subsystem  </text><text start="712.14" dur="8.58">on NT really is as if you can actually run these 
two applications this setup process looks just  </text><text start="720.72" dur="7.62">about fine the installers run through like a 
charm as noted earlier on the PM desktop manager  </text><text start="728.34" dur="6.12">is absent so I&amp;#39;m curious to see what happens 
now as it&amp;#39;s asking to create the program icons  </text><text start="735.36" dur="7.44">now that&amp;#39;s really nice Microsoft obviously 
extended DPM subsystem in a way that the program  </text><text start="742.8" dur="7.08">group creation is intercepted and redirected 
to windows program manager so the icons are  </text><text start="749.88" dur="6.42">created here although with some very generic icons 
even referring to them being MS-DOS applications  </text><text start="757.44" dur="6.42">that&amp;#39;s sort of a missed opportunity as at least 
they should have been including a genericos to  </text><text start="763.86" dur="7.02">icon in my opinion and still I think it would 
have been really nice to have the desktop manager  </text><text start="770.88" dur="5.28">on the presentation manager as well don&amp;#39;t 
tell me this couldn&amp;#39;t have been co-existing  </text><text start="777" dur="7.68">to put it even further on trial let&amp;#39;s also install 
the windows native version of excel 3.0 as implied  </text><text start="784.68" dur="5.46">by the technical limitations how presentation 
manager applications are run on Windows and  </text><text start="790.14" dur="6.24">T I cannot put them side by side directly 
so I need to use again some video trickery  </text><text start="797.16" dur="6.96">nevertheless it&amp;#39;s totally fascinating to see 
literally one empty same application compiled for  </text><text start="804.12" dur="7.86">different operating systems running side by side 
on the same host OS and this for 1995 technology  </text><text start="813.06" dur="5.82">one may say many things about Microsoft but 
these guys have really done a nice job here  </text><text start="818.88" dur="5.52">to make that work also wanted to give 
it a shot with the presentation manager  </text><text start="824.4" dur="6.24">version of Microsoft Word and while it did 
actually install whenever I try running it it  </text><text start="830.64" dur="5.82">would quickly switch over to the PM shell and 
immediately drop back to the Windows desktop  </text><text start="837.18" dur="5.82">something is definitely wrong here but 
let&amp;#39;s leave it at that at least that&amp;#39;s  </text><text start="843" dur="6.18">what I thought though on the next reboot I get 
this error which is directly related to Windows  </text><text start="849.18" dur="6.3">NT failing to load some dependency that was 
introduced by the os2 version of Microsoft Word  </text><text start="856.44" dur="7.62">I recovered from this situation using the last 
known good recovery option on nt&amp;#39;s boot manager my  </text><text start="864.06" dur="7.38">last video now is 2 1.3 also featured the windows 
3.0 applets for os2 which were made to run using  </text><text start="871.44" dur="6.84">the willow compatibility layer not too different 
from the wine API implementation in later years  </text><text start="879.42" dur="6.78">it totally fascinated me how this made the 
windows native apples run in os2 and I wanted  </text><text start="886.2" dur="6.96">to really push it now and see if I can actually 
install in Romney&amp;#39;s applets on Windows NT as well  </text><text start="893.16" dur="7.62">I know that this is kind of pointless as Windows 
and T 3.x includes the very same applets already  </text><text start="900.78" dur="7.38">but it&amp;#39;s all about the demonstration purposes 
the installation again is CLI driven under arms  </text><text start="908.16" dur="5.58">through but guess my surprise when I saw the 
applets running on the Windows native desktop  </text><text start="914.34" dur="5.94">I would have expected them to switch over 
to Ronaldo is 2 presentation manager instead  </text><text start="920.94" dur="6.3">but just by seeing this it implies that the 
compatibility layer introduced by Willow on  </text><text start="927.24" dur="8.76">os2 just intercepts of in 16 API calls with the 
applications remaining widely unaltered otherwise  </text><text start="936" dur="6.6">I cannot reasonably explain why the applications 
would remain on the Windows environment to which  </text><text start="942.6" dur="6.06">they are native maybe it&amp;#39;s worthwhile to drill 
down if the actual binaries are the original  </text><text start="948.66" dur="7.44">ones that came with Windows 3.0 unaltered or if 
they were in fact linked against both the windows  </text><text start="956.1" dur="8.28">dlls and The Willow dlls making them real hybrid 
binaries actually the installer claims exactly  </text><text start="964.38" dur="6.66">this that the binaries were specifically linked 
correct but even without exploring this at this  </text><text start="971.04" dur="5.04">point I believe that this statement is only 
true for things like the included main dll  </text><text start="976.08" dur="7.86">files like kernel GDI user but not necessarily 
the included applets I&amp;#39;m pretty certain that  </text><text start="983.94" dur="6.72">only the main libraries were linked against os2 
specific dlls whereas the amplits themselves just  </text><text start="990.66" dur="7.98">linked to the standard Windows dlls thus making 
them an old third I may be wrong and probably am  </text><text start="998.64" dur="7.44">and it definitely goes too far for this video as 
there&amp;#39;s one more thing I&amp;#39;d like to explore so far  </text><text start="1006.08" dur="7.08">you saw the PM subsystem must be started manual 
before you can run any applications the already  </text><text start="1013.16" dur="5.94">mentioned Remy file on the PM setup disk also 
covers some means of starting the presentation  </text><text start="1019.1" dur="6.72">manager as a service while the mentions were 
the required files are found on floppy disk  </text><text start="1025.82" dur="6.42">number four it&amp;#39;s odd that one of the two phones 
is actually installed and the other one not</text><text start="1037.94" dur="6">I do as told and create a new 
service named os2pm subsystem like so  </text><text start="1044.66" dur="5.4">the readme provides additional instructions 
on what must now be configured in the system  </text><text start="1050.06" dur="7.26">registry I&amp;#39;ll add the parameters key and the 
two values for app directory and start PM shell  </text><text start="1057.32" dur="7.44">as all I want is to pre-start the presentation 
manager subsystem starting this service while the  </text><text start="1064.76" dur="5.94">services control panel seems to have the desired 
effect running it now as a persistent service  </text><text start="1071.54" dur="6.6">and now I can simply run any applet like the PM 
control panel which will then launch into the  </text><text start="1078.14" dur="6">PM shell as usual with the presentation manager 
now running as a service let&amp;#39;s see what happens  </text><text start="1084.14" dur="7.14">when I log in with a different user see how the 
pmshell icon appears in the lower left corner  </text><text start="1091.82" dur="7.02">and I can jump directly into the PM file manager 
right away without needing to care if the PM shell  </text><text start="1098.84" dur="7.14">is already running or not same goes if I look 
back into the administrator account with that  </text><text start="1105.98" dur="6.3">being done I do hope that it will now start the 
PM shell automatically so I can use it right away  </text><text start="1113.18" dur="6.84">and here it is on the next startup os2.exe 
is being launched automatically when I log in  </text><text start="1120.92" dur="8.04">but what&amp;#39;s that this screen suddenly went dark 
okay it&amp;#39;s not an issue with the monitor but  </text><text start="1128.96" dur="7.5">I think I crashed my NT can it be but even the 
second attempt ends up in the very same situation  </text><text start="1137.06" dur="6.3">So eventually I was going again for the last 
known good configuration to bring the system  </text><text start="1143.36" dur="7.62">up again and revert those last service related 
changes I guess I need to dig in further on what  </text><text start="1150.98" dur="7.44">was going wrong here okay okay I was pushing it 
to the limits so it&amp;#39;s no surprise it broke but  </text><text start="1158.42" dur="6.48">I broke it like four times through the entire 
process can you believe it still I think you  </text><text start="1164.9" dur="6.54">got the idea but the multio&amp;#39;s personalities 
that David Cutler and his team envisioned  </text><text start="1171.44" dur="6.78">for Windows NT it&amp;#39;s quite Progressive for the 
time to have an operating system with no less  </text><text start="1178.22" dur="10.32">than four personalities windows on Windows 16 
and tvdm os2 1.x and posix and Windows NT 3.51  </text><text start="1188.54" dur="7.2">did not only feature these 16-bit windows API 
but also the rewind 32-bit API which was about  </text><text start="1195.74" dur="9">to be introduced with Windows 95 and yes this is 
an original Factory sealed item nowadays we can  </text><text start="1204.74" dur="6.72">do literally everything using virtualization but 
for the mid 90s this was really ahead of the time  </text><text start="1211.46" dur="6.84">so long I&amp;#39;m the Vintage collector and 
this was my story on Windows NT 3.51  </text><text start="1218.84" dur="8.7">thanks for watching and see you again next time 
[Music] future count this Channel&amp;#39;s Community  </text><text start="1227.54" dur="5.82">tab you&amp;#39;ll find some polls on potential 
upcoming videos you&amp;#39;re very welcome to  </text><text start="1233.36" dur="9.72">upload on upcoming topics or drop in new ones 
you&amp;#39;d like me to chase down [Music] foreign</text></transcript>