PZ Myers and the Art of Shameless Dishonesty

by Thunderf00t • 132,086 views

The short version, PZ Myers gave me his personal assurances that I would have the freedom to talk about whatever I wanted on freethoughtblogs. I did talk about an issue that I thought FTB was way...

All I have know is who was honest and who was not.  I think we know.  Thumbs up on this vid.
PZ is a scum bag. His followers are morons. They are all but religious, and just like the religious they have a persecution complex, they shun those who don't toe the line, they claim the moral high ground, they appeal to emotion instead of logic, and use each other to validate their otherwise obviously moronic bullshit. They are also hypocrites who use real sexism against men and women who do not conform as a tool against perceived sexism. As we can see by a comment below, if you disagree with their bullshit and apply critical thinking to feminism, you are equated to a misogynist radical Muslim. Such quality comments are common amongst the plusers. We must either accept that they really are this stupid, which is probable, or that they are purposely trolling for the sake of being divisive.
PZ Myers is a close-minded bigot. 
PZ, methinks is a repressed rapist. It's all about projection, you think? His famed Skepticon wager with a female stranger still makes my skin crawl. I wasn't a feminist until that moment; that feminists would embrace him mystifies and causes my immediate resignation therefrom. 
I had the same problem Thunderf00t had. I wasn't given a personal assurance I wouldn't be banned like Thunderf00t was, but I called into The Atheist Experience to talk about why the atheist and feminist movements should be kept separate. They posted the discussion on their blog, they let me make one comment about men's rights/feminism, and then they banned me, or so it seems. At least one comment I made (that wasn't about feminism) got removed. Worse yet, Martin (a speaker on the show) refused to counter anything I said, encouraged others to counter me (which few even tried), and now none of my responses to people will go through. There were personal attacks against me on the show that were unfair and there were personal attacks against me on the blog, so I feel I should be able to defend myself against those attacks. Of course I'm not saying they are breaking any legal obligation, but allowing personal attacks against me and then censoring my responses is not the right thing to do. The good news is that even many of the feminists spoke up against how they treated me on the show, one person claimed they changed their mind and sided with me, nobody claimed to change their mind towards the hosts of the show, and so while I could've articulated better at some points, I think I did a decent job. The more we talk about feminism on this blog and on The Atheist Experience, the more the show and blog will be exposed for what it has become. It's unfortunate how quickly they have destroyed such a good show.
So sorry, your story is not original! So sorry that your story is part of a pattern that is as insidious as it is disturbing. So sorry you ever met these people of darkness. Your words indicate a sensitive mind; regretfully, the leaders of Atheist+, understanding only power, attempted to shame it into utter submission. But what really burns my ass, unlike TF, many atheist celebs simply sit on the sidelines, out of the field of play, fearful that if they were to enter the fray on the side of good, they'd be treated no better than you. So they sit, hoping against hope itself, that somehow all this bitterness will simply go away! In the meantime, with no cat in sight, the rat romp!
Rebecca Watson, do you seriously think people want to rape you? Can you not understand what is happening? You put up a video that states any liberal intellectual man who does not want to discuss feminism is worse than a rape threat, they are showing you how wrong you are! No one means it seriously, but they are taking your words (that you were very adamant about) and using them against you. So I ask again, is the supposed "hundreds" (maybe 1 or 2) of rape threats really worse than liberal intellectual men not wanting to listen to your intolerable dribble. 
Actual rape is a terrible thing that no one should have to experience. On the internet it basically means the same as I will slap your mother, kick your dog, or look at your pictures sternly on Facebook. It's not as if she doesn't know this... She is clearly an intelligent woman. I'm not saying that harassment is "okay" but it just is what it is on the internet. If you want free speech (AND WE DO) then you'll have dumbasses acting like... dumbasses
Agreed... There's a word that describes feminists like her.... Neurotic. I mean that in the most medically terminology possible. I'm all for the cause, but some truly need some therapy. The do more damage then good. Scepticon 7 seemed way to full of the wrong... Lets say agenda,  for my liking, as well. Some do more damage then good. When they don't no when to shut up.
Many seem to forget that you tried to stay anonymous. Don't listen to haters, keep science, freedom and honesty up.
I like a lot of your videos & dislike a lot of others, this falling into the latter. A rape threat, particularly in person should not be diminished, not matter who it is said to. It wasn't even relevant to the subject matter here.
I dont understand how atheist are labeled for attacking feminist when Atheism is a lack of faith in religion and not whatever she thinks it is.
Lol, don't these atheism+ idiots realize they are just as bad as the ones they "fight" against.
Yeah for sure. Totally realize it and you are totally right. You must be a 'jesus loves me' genius.
Good job for standing firm. Feminism is a mental disease.
Free Thought Blogs, where you are free to agree with the admins! Also, as a libertarian, I am disgusted that some in our ranks would try to silence you. That cuts so against the grain of actual libertarianism, that I almost question the allegation, but you seem like an honest guy so giving you the benefit of the doubt, I would say that those who tried to silence you under the banner of liberty do not understand libertarianism at all and are either republicans who smoke pot or democrats who are anti-war. We have seen a lot of that kind, who simply view us as a 3rd party and a way to express their dissatisfaction with the party they are normally aligned with. It is nice to see the movement grow, but many of these people claim the libertarian title, yet do not understand that a big part of liberty is allowing those who disagree with you to have a voice, and that trying to control your fellow man (outside of preventing violence) is not only a bad idea, but is contrary to the entire concept of liberty. So I apologize that some one from my end of the political spectrum attempted to silence you, and know that even though I disagree with your views on libertarianism, I would fight for your right to make those views heard. In fact, I especially like hearing people who disagree with me, because that causes me to continually evaluate what I do believe to see if it stands up to scrutiny. Beliefs that cannot be challenged are worthless and people like you not only entertain me, but keep me sharp. Keep up the good work and thank you for your contributions to the public discourse.
The sceptical community are some of the biggest supporters of censorship there are. For example, Dawkins has raged against the X-Files. You campaigned to have Rupert Sheldrake's TEDx  talk removed from the internet because he challenged the basis of your belief system. One of your leaders suggested his book should be burned for heresy. You are at it all the time. You celebrated the jailing of Erich von Daniken. You banned Halton Arp from looking through your telescopes. Once your own house is in order you may have a grievance, but until then what goes around comes around.
We hear less and less of "free"thoughtblogs these days and even less of PZ Myers. Extraordinary how that what was predicted some time ago. I guess we can lengthen the old apothegm "the web is a place where religions come to die" to "the web is a place where religions and atheistpluses come to die". Both Myers and Carrier have brought calumny upon their own heads. The "elevatorgate" woman doesn't count because she never had a reputation to lose
you are mad because you were banned from freethoughtblog because you posted about how other users you disagree with have been given too much attention and too much freedom to post content.  I know you think it's ironic because YOU were banned, but if you would just pull your head out of your own ass, the ultimate irony might not pass you by completely
perhaps i'm just incredibly stupid, but i dont get the supposed irony either. he dissented from the hive mind and posted about it. got banned for dissenting. the only irony i get is that of being banned from a place called "free thought blogs" for thinking freely instead of joining the hive mind. could you kindly explain what it is i missed?
Agreed, PZ Myers is a politically correct asshole.  For him there is only correct thought, not free thought.
Don't put How the World Works in with other censorious bastards.  He never tried to disable comments or ban your videos.  He linked to them...that's how I followed the argument.  I agree though...PZ is weak.
+PZ Myers What a silly muppet you are. Freethoughtblogs? Like someone calling themselves liberal humanists who believe gay marriage should be a criminal offense. Like a democracy with a despotic king. Like the freedom to vote in the USSR, where there's one party on the list. Like an environmentalist driving a hummer. You're a joke... like A+ is.
I've not heard much about Atheism+ or FTB and their ilk, but they sound like nonsense. Great vid apart from when the screen went all squared.
Man your mic sucks my audiophile headphones are picking up some static.
When I first heard about this individual, I thought, ‘great! a scientist and an outspoken New Atheist, maybe I should read him, he sounds interesting’.  I was already someone who enjoyed reading and watching people like Lawrence Krauss and Richard Dawkins, (Carl Sagan was my inspiration in my teens) so I wanted to check out this PZ Myers because he sounded like he carried this familiar and likeable intellectual gene (a scientific attitude, a secular approach and a healthy skepticism and irreverence).  Probably because I'm introverted and shy, I didn't immediately join as a commenter on his blog and after witnessing what went on in there I never did (and in retrospect I count my lucky stars for that) but instead I simply read his articles and posts.  I guess I was what's called a 'lurker'.  So I lurked.  But soon enough I began to notice some disquieting patterns with this man.    For one, he  exhibits all the character traits of a paranoid absolutist and egomaniac. He has a tendency to see enemies in many places, even unlikely places.  He would define his moral, social and political persuasions as ‘rational and indisputably right’ and those opposed, or even merely different, as ‘irrational, incoherent, despicable, evil’ and worth censorship or violent contempt or even worse.  Also, when he’s wrong… but he’s never wrong of course.  He’s somehow managed to become both all-good and infallible like that invisible Entity whose existence he supposedly questions.  He accuses his enemies of ‘doubling down’ when he himself would triple-and-quadruple down on the non-existent occasion where he could possibly be less than 100% right.     Then he would brand the individuals he doesn’t like as ‘black sheep’ and cull them from the herd by not only banning them but embalming them in some virtual dungeon where he would forever flaunt their ‘sins’ along with his final dismissive sentence and summary execution like some kind of grotesque trophies (sexist and racist troll, tone troll, slimy something, loser, etc).  The ‘rationale’ he would usually offer is that the transgressor had committed some mortal sin in the PZ Myers Third-Wave Testament, be it “sexism”, “racism”, “ignorance”, “tone trolling”, “white privilege” or what not.  Sometimes the heretic is branded accurately (though always excessively) but many times his accusations were merely a pretext to remove someone who didn’t quite satisfy all of the prerequisites on his ideological checklist.  Many times it was even more arbitrary than that; for example, someone who displeased him in some subtle and innocuous manner.  Whatever the case may be, that virtual life form is then quickly snuffed out on His blog.   Thus PZ would segregate the world at large into those who think like him and those who don’t- usually the mark of the totalitarian mindset.   But perhaps the worst trait is the manner of his baiting and training of his own acolytes.  These acolytes would curiously pride themselves on residing in something akin to a ‘shark tank’ and themselves having ‘shark-like teeth’ which they would sink into those unsuspecting swimmers who happen not to be ideologically pure enough or up to par in some unforgivable way.  That is the attitude in there but one can hardly blame childlike minds for childlike attitudes; the real culprit is the manipulator behind the curtains.  This passive-aggressive manchild who is supposed to be a middle-aged scientist and scholar has the emotional maturity of a pubescent and the vicious nature of street thug.  It’s he who would consistently throw pieces of meat into his tank while saying, and I paraphrase of course, “see, see what scum this person is (it could be a religious person or a fellow atheist, or a Sam Harris on profiling or whatever target had incensed PZ that day or week and earned his ire).”  And simultaneously he would say along the lines, “yes my creatures, pride yourself on your viciously critical little minds and righteous natures, have at them, tear at those sinners out there- show no mercy!”.   And his acolytes, ‘sharks’, would swim all very excited at being positively reinforced by their master while hungrily waiting for the next feeding frenzy and its next victim, sorry I meant, ‘transgressor’.    The Master’s philosophy of course isn’t merely atheism, it is atheism plus. In fact the atheism has become rather an afterthought on that blog it seems. So his targets of opportunity aren’t always ‘religious nuts’.  It could be anyone who doesn’t fit the precise measurements of a PZ-ideologically pure Aryan, I mean individual, in his social and political dogma.   ‘Plus’ of course is used as the mathematically symbolic addition for the umbrella concept of ‘social justice’.  Under the guise of being a crusader for ‘social justice’ –and mind you, not any generic social justice but social justice with a specific and heavy dose of ‘sex positive feminism’- PZ can usually be found goose-stepping  about in his digital microkingdom seeking to extirpate real and imagined ‘enemies’ of his state.  Thus he’s managed to attract and brainwash a merry band of fools, masochists, sadists, closet absolutists, paranoid hysterics and other frothing-at-the-mouth escapees of the local mental asylums.   Calling this invariably his ‘horde’ or ‘the commentariat’, he has a few ‘self-selected’ Troika-wannabee bullies who are most trigger-happy to denounce any perceived heretic or enemy of the PZ-state under a quick enfilading volley of curses, insults, condescension and shaming tactics.   This is called ‘the dogpile’ or the ‘feeding frenzy’ and while it marshals the small and short muskets of all of the acolytes it is usually captained by a few more savvy Pharyngula lifers and self-anointed Inquisitors who would lead the charge as audaciously and as recklessly as can be.  They would bury the sinner under an avalanche of logic jargon and redundancy and by-fiat assertions while presupposing all of their own righteousness and the ‘validity’ of their own ‘ironclad’ positions.  If the victim/target is slightly more erudite or competent in philosophy and resists the initial charge and somehow dares and manages to defend herself from this cowardly attack on all sides, the Grand Inquisitor conveniently lurks in the sidelines ready to deliver the final incapacitating blow from his ‘ban hammer’ which he wields with all the zeal of a Teutonic knight.   And this of course is justice par course for them, or at least the ‘social’ kind.  And gosh darn it, if it's good enough for them, it should be good enough for everyone else! 
Unfortunately some of these types have bleeded over to the FriendlyAtheist blog also.   They are vicious nuts.
I edited his Wiki page for you.
PZ Myers looks like a cross between the typical ageing American white east Asian child sex tourist that jets off solo on "business" at least twice per-annum and Doctor Harold Shipman. So yes A paedophile and successful serial killer, What a top bloke. Still I never judge a book by its cover ;) 
Is it just me or is this video rendered horribly, man i love your videos but you need to work on your rendering lol.
Yo, +Thunderf00t - I'm going to rape you.
OMG!!! that is a direct threat!! IMA GOIN TO CALL TEH AUHTORITES!
Wait, at what point did a libertarian attempt to silence you?
+ReligionOfNice I'm an AnCap but I think the whole "real libertarian" thing is stupid.
I think it derives from a false belief they have some correct set of axioms from which all political position can be deduced, flawlessly and authoritatively.   
That ignorant cunt Rebecca Watson and her fixation on rape again!
If anyone is unfamiliar with PZ and his attendant horde of socially prepubescent acolytes, just read +fulltimesnob below, he's absolutely nailed it! I would go one further and suppose that PZ is likely a closet narcissist who feeds of the batting eyelids and soft cooing calls of his fawning claque of ugly ducklings....all the time hiding behind an academic raincoat stuffed brim full with cheap boiled sweets and bad intentions.  He likely puts up with the odd mangina as his superiority complex won't allow him to fear they might have a better chance at picking off a straggler than he. And Tf00t, did you really, actually believe that FTB was about 'free thought' and 'academic freedom'? You're a clever guy and I enjoy your postings but come on mate, it took me 3 to 4 minutes of reading to realize they were a bunch of troll-hunting professional victims.
Your views on women are as bigoted as those of radical Muslims. Bigotry is not freethinking.
Why does it seem that this new form of radical feminism is unable to exist and stand on it's own merit? Why are these folks so preoccupied with hijacking a completely unrelated movement such as atheism like some form of blight or parasite in a shameless and laughable attempt to claim it as their own? To me it seems like starting an organization called "Literacy+": a movement that believes that all children should be taught to read but that additionally believes that all whites are either slave owners or potential slave owners.
Thunderf00t got what all trolls get - banning. The video above is a prime example of his method of trolling. Firstly he starts with a invective tirade against PZ Myers, while hypocritically criticizing PZ Myers for using invective language. Secondly, he suggests there was an agreement, which he offers no record for, that gave him "100%" freedom to write whatever he wanted.  Then uses that as his sole basis to claim lack of intergrity.  Presumably, there is some truth in his statement about the nature of the agreement, but Thunderf00t portrays the agreement as carte blanche freedom to write anything at all, which is the only way he could legitimately disparage PZ Myers, in suggesting Myers broke the agreement.  However, 100% free to write whatever he want obviously meant within the goals and terms of the FTB i.e. Thunderf00t wouldn't be able to proselytize for Islam on FTB, or unreasonably attack other members of the community or its social network, under the guise of "freedom" or "free thinking". Thirdly, Thunderf00t admits that he wanted to "challenge the plurality" of the FTB, in terms of what he perceives as disproportionate attention to sexual harassment, rather than recognizing that the issue of sexual harrassment was a hot topic at the time.  Thunderf00t entered FTB with the intention to stir up trouble. Fourthly, Thunderf00t in this video focuses on what PZ Myers said in his email, without providing us with the content of his posts that Myers is referring too. Thunderf00t hides from us the content, and denies us the chance to think for ourselves and come to our own conclusions.  Instead he dictates to us (like some religious Guru) what we should think about his unseen posts. Fifthly, Thunderf00t uses much hyperbole in discussing the issue, such as misrepresenting the "we" in PZ Myers email, that obviously meant "we" as representative of interest of the organization, and not "we" a collection of individuals that make up the "lynch mob". Thunderf00t is clearly stretching the language of the email in order to make his facile attacks, and escalate tensions. Sixth, Thunderf00t says "I don't want to make this personally, but [I'm going to make it personal anyway]".  This is the biggest indication of an axe to grind, and one that he seems to have been grinding long before he joined FTB. Without knowing what Thunderf00t wrote, I can only presume from his current tone, that he wrote something in much the same tone, hyperbole and exaggeration, which PZ Myers' video seems to confirm.  So I'm not surprised he was banned. Also, I don't disagree with Thunderf00t's assessment of Watson.  I too believe she is a troll. But her being a troll doesn't mean Thunderf00t is not a troll too.
Exactly.  Nobody should have the right to say whatever they want on a site called 'Free Thought Blogs.'  I mean... it just goes without saying, doesn't it? Thunderf00t was wrong to point this out as if it was some sort of irony.
You are accusing of thunderf00t not showing us the actual content of the articles that caused his banning, but then you are accusing him of being a "troll" with even less evidence yourself. You have not shown us any concrete evidence that his writings did deserve a ban and that they were trollish, you are just making the assertion based solely on "he doesn't show us the original context". In other words, you are not being any better than what you claim him to be. You are just being a hypocrite. None of your points are justified nor rational. You equate "challenging the plurality of FTB" with "stirring up trouble". I would argue that saying things like that is being a troll. You are just denigrating his intentions based on pure speculation and vague interpretation, rather then concrete evidence. In other words, trolling.
freethoughtblogs is a sinking ship anyway...
If this is true, then I have lost all respect for PZ Meyers. What kind of idiot owns a site called "free thought blog" then kicked someone off for expressing their views? How moronic. 
Its clear that PZ Myers has been indoctrinated by the matriarchy of feminists 
Is this the start of Atheism+???
No, that was the end of it.
Thunderfoot I feel sorry for you for spending too much time in the USA.
I think he's given carte blanche to the feminazis just so he can be their safe haven in atheist-academia and of course so he wouldn't be slandered by them as well. however, that's clearly no excuse for this sort of blatant dishonesty and absolute failure of character.
What a sad thing, for you to lash out in a blog that you make money off of, against people who hurt your feelings. I so want to believe you're better than this, but the more videos I see the more you prove me wrong. Step back from the brink, give up the kickstarter scam, come back into the light. My opinion for what it's worth.
A rape threat is a rape threat, Thunderf00t. She reported what had happened to her, accurately.
+ReligionOfNice You could have shortened your reply by saying: "Yes, I am an idiot." This would have provided exactly the same information.
You don't know that. I know of 4 instances off the top of my head where friends of mine had been accused of raping a woman that they weren't even around at the time that it supposedly happened. Wanna know how I know that? They were with me. And also... You mean to tell me that women like Sarkesian, who make wild claims about massacre threats, etc. and yet have no proof for such claims. As a matter of fact, in situations like that, it doesn't even matter if you can prove it, as all of a sudden you have a shit-ton of beta males and intellectually under-nourished feminazis backing the accuser up, even though all they have to go off of is hearsay.
that's absolutely ridiculous
Hey here's a big shocker: In addition to the fact that PZ's response does not specifically address any of the issues raised by thunderf00t, PZ's reply on youtube to this fiasco has comments and ratings disabled! Hmmm... ratings and comments disabled. Who else does that?
I find this whole PZ Meyers and the Skepchick thing to be too weird for words. It's like Charlie's Angels, where you have a lot of young, intelligent, beautiful and capable women being completely dominated by a dirty and creepy old man with an intercom, all the while as it is being served up as something empowering to women.
Like it or not you can't have anything without a state.
If a person tries to live in the woods naturally these days in USA, he gets tracked down with satelite photography. True facts. But in fact I am an autistic who has a hard time walking down the street without being questioned and confronted, thanks for your ignorant assumptions that everyone is a hypocrite like you, Yuppie house slave scum.
This has all come about because someone tried to hit on Ms Watson, And she turned him down, was he not good looking , so its harassment, I remember an experiment that came to that conclusion. Jesus wept
I even find acceptable some degree of legal asymmetry favoring women (any situationally unfairly disfavored group, which may include even white-hetero males), given that it really improves a situation (intentions aren't enough), not causing more unfairness. But the "feminism"/"feminist" label does not matter. Not more than "communism" (*I'm not equating both*), which could also be defended as something good and flowery, that got distorted by some. What really matters is *reality*, not labels.
The word Atheist originated in Ancient Greece. Atheism is older than Christianity. Atheism is not a religion.
You're insane.... What is said in an average COD session is infinitely worse than what you can be called in text. ;)
Yah, got it, thanks. Hadn't heard about that before this vid, but it's now been a while and I've done some pointed research. Thanks for replying, though. :)
As a gay man, I know that there is something like what feminists call "the patriarchy", because I have been bumping into it most of my life. It isn't like a huge, Illuminati like conspiracy of the evil doers keeping us down. It is more like the sum of things like fathers telling sons "boys don't cry", or children seeing their mother constantly defer to men. It might even be better called "traditional gender roles". But intangible though it is, if you push against it people will push back. Hard.
From Wikipedia, "Religion is a collection of belief systems, cultural systems, and world views that relate humanity to spirituality and, sometimes, to moral values.[note 1] Many religions have narratives, symbols, traditions and sacred histories that are intended to give meaning to life or to explain the origin of life or the Universe." I cannot see the word "God" in the whole description. Could you please try to convince the "world" about your view first before convincing me? Thank you.
Atheism + is a trojan horse. Any cursory listen to Richard Carrier at any TAM meeting makes it painfully obvious that Atheism + means Atheism + Cultural Marxism. And cultural marxists are not exactly known for free thought and tolerating dissenting ideas.
Yeah, we atheists usually gather on fridays for our gang-rape-parties, everybody knows it, but - sorry Rebecca - members only (in other words: you're too ugly, so stop begging).
“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” These were not his words, but rather those of Evelyn Beatrice Hall, written under the pseudonym S. G. Tallentyre in her 1906 biographical book The Friends of Voltaire. (Wikipedia...)
Damn, guys, why the infighting? None of us agree 100% on 100% of the topics. We already have enough dragons to collectively slay without getting sideways on issues - such as 'Feminism' - which (in my opinion) are WAY down the line of importance.
OK. Thanks. I was considering taking sides in this thing because I have some opinions about the topics involved, but based on that, I'm just going to stay out of it. I can't support doing crap to support a philosophical position. As for posting URL's, you can if you insert some strategic spaces like this: freethoughtblogs. com/blaghag/ 2012/08/ thunderf00ts-unethical-breach-of-our-privacy/
There is nothing much free or thoughtful at "free thought blogs" any more, and there is nothing much atheist in the "atheist" + forum. I feel sad for american atheism. I hope this crazy shit splinters into nothingness sooner rather than later.
yeah, I find that a very large percentage of those who call themselves "free thinkers" are rather dogmatic religion haters and anything but free thinkers. Thunderfoot's initial conversation with this blogger reminds me of a forum that initially told me it wouldn't ban me for being different because it was not "our forum" but a resource for public information, and that ended up banning me with no rules violations citing that they are a private forum and can do what they want. Typical Yuppie scum.
the lone wolf has always exisited at the fringe of the pack, douchebag.
A+ = just like church but without the elegant decorations.
why not split the "debate" into two seperate areas: atheism on the left, sexism on the right, and keep them seperate, like the seperation of church and state? perhaps i missed the main bulk of this conflict by avoiding drama like the plague, but that's good, right? it seems a shame to come looking to learn new things and finding all the dialog is derailed by a bunch of negative vibes where nobody is happy.
Yes, but a fraction might be people who are against RW/feminists, but just dumb and don't see that rape threats, even if just for trolling, or for shock/offense, (with no intention of raping, or wish of actual rape by someone else), just feed feminist's arguments. "Pure trolls" are likely to be indifferent to the issue I guess, or simply ignore it, so pure-trolling wouldn't be that common, as it's all a "niche" polemic. It wouldn't be surprising if many "threats" came from feminists themselves.
The answer depends on which aspect one is discussing. For example, the idea of "slut shaming", reduces the probabllity that a victim will report a rape making it easier for the rapist to get away with it and also may cause the victim to blame his or her self. (Note: Guys get raped too. My friend was raped by his brother. Pretty sad case.)
I thought the quotation marks around all the text would make clear enough taht it was not a real statement, but a parody of a creationist depiction of the whole debate. Sorry for accidentally trolling you. Pay more attention next time. Specially if you're going to call someone a moron when you're the one mistaking parody for reality. There's some discount points, after all it's a creationist parody and there's Poe's law warranting that.
PZ Myers is one of the worst scumbags on the planet. Truly a vile piece of shit.
PZ Myers's video is just desperate face keeping. Nothing legit, or evidence/examples.
Maybe you should change your video format... I'm getting lots of glitchy playback and I can't be the only one.
PZ myers is a dinosaur who doesn't understand the Internet
At the end the end there....did you just try to sick your fans on him? Seriously? You are resorting to that kind of play ground shit because he hurt your feelings?
But it *is* trolling, most of those posts are from people who don't actually hold those kind of beliefs but are doing it purely to get a reaction out of the blogger herself or her fans. No one is condoning trolling or treating it as anything other than people being intentionally stupid, but we should call it what it is instead of misrepresenting it to lend more weight to arguments. To ignore the existence and extent of trolling on the internet would be silly.
Well, if we try to be objective here and look how the term is actually used, it seems to mean, that there exists cultural "norms" that make it easier for the rapist and harder for the rape victim. Now this claim is clearly true, in many cultures including our own. This doesn't mean, that our cultural has a desire to rape but rather that we inadvertantly help the rapist more than the rape victim in several tangible ways. On the bright side, I think, our society has addressed some of the issues.
Looks like atheism has a new enemy: Church of the New Feminism. I'm surprised other atheists didn't see this coming. Did you learn nothing from religion? Did you forget religion isn't the only dogma in the world with an Orwellian agenda? We shouldn't be so arrogant. Much of the faults we see in religion come from the faults of man. Organized atheism will suffer the same fate as organized religion. Hell is other people, as existentialist say, and God is dead, now the Goddess is after his throne.
I noticed the "pz vs Thunder" video, "the comment and the Likes or dislikes" features were dis-abled. That means PZ was in the wrong.
Well, most criminals in jail are innocent. If you ask them. It's like saying "I*m not racist," and then go on to say something racist. It doesn't matter how hard Lee Doran denies being a libertarian, when everything out of his mouth is libertarian arguments. He may not be one, but in that case, he should stop making libertarian arguments constantly.
What's this rumor about TF hacking private emails on the freethoughts sights?
People make death threats to the president over the internet all the time. Yet the president doesn't tell everyone about them and no one thinks that those threats undermine legitimate criticisms of him. The reason we don't is because everyone acknowledges that they're either tasteless jokes or someone amplifying their discontent behind the protection of a fake name and a keyboard.The fact that you think those comments are even worth responding to is what concerns me.
PZ Myers is a fuckin tool, it's weird how he can be so obviously intelligent but act like a petty little kid when it comes to shit like this :(
I've found that too, they seem to love to criticise men, but for some reason think they are excluded from their own generalisations. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for equality, but kissing someone's ass because they are female isn't equal treatment.
God you are so pessimistic, but i cant say I disagree after what transpired with this whole feminism in the skeptic movement shit. Im so fucking done with feminism.
He doesn't make libertarian arguments constantly. Sure, there's a good deal of overlap between his views and libertarian views, but there are significant differences.
CWS is a meat-pie infodump based on Seinfeldism
Wait, /Libertarians/ took a shot a Thunderf00t? When did that happen?
Congratulations, guys....our common enemies ('religionists/creationists/ID-ists') are LAUGHING THEIR COLLECTIVE ASSES OFF at all this ridiculous infighting. PZ Myers, I agree with Thunderfoot. Feminists, GET A FUCKING LIFE! BTW, Rebecca...,I don't think you're ugly, Baby!
In Wikipedia I can, in fact, put my own definition. The word sacred come from "Holy": Made or declared holy. Dedicated to or set apart for the worship of a deity(from wikipedia). Protected by superstition or piety from irreligious actions. See? religions base is the concept fo Holy and from this come sacred. :)
Oh, now it's "Seinfeldism"! I like that much better!
PZ Myers is a degenerate scumbag. I wouldn't piss in his face if his head was on fire.
P Z Myers is now being attacked by CYBORG WARRIORS~!!!
Thunderf00t should take Hitchen's place as the fourth horseman.
Show more Loading...
to add this to Watch Later

Add to