Upload

Bill Nye: Creationism Is Not Appropriate For Children

by Big Think • 6,948,582 views

Don't miss new Big Think videos! Subscribe by clicking here: http://goo.gl/CPTsV5 Evolution is the fundamental idea in all of life science, in all of biology. According to Bill Nye, aka "the...

"Useful for tracing lineages within existing species?"  Bwuahaha, yep a Fundie said that with a straight f-f-face and straight "F's".   Don't explain it, just enjoy it.
Report spam or abuse
The fundamental difference between creationism and evolution is that creationism requires abject intellectual incompetence and pathological lying. Creationists are the ones who: Pathologically lie about what scientists have said, what other users have said, and about science. Impersonate other users. Have multiple sock accounts. Harass other users. Pathologically misrepresent what science is and how it works. Disable replies to their idiotic nonsense. Exaggerate and lie about their degrees and accomplishments. Habitually pretend to expertise they do not have. Quote mine - and then fail to even recognize that quote mining epitomizes intellectually dishonesty!   When you're trying to understand the fake arguments here, note that evolution and creationism are not just "two different, but equal views." It's simple: The creationists are liars.
Report spam or abuse
Maybe all the animals on the Ark had their asses hooked up to ass-sucking-machines that were powered by horses on treadmills. Donkeys on treadmills powered the fans that conducted the stench out the one window. For the necessary refrigeration system they powered that with elephants on treadmills. Then there were the feeding tubes with an abundance of species-specific Ensure™ and SOMA to keep everyone content and non-violent. I'm sure they could make it through a year of greater than 300 degree weather. Don't you?
Report spam or abuse
+matchlockfun   I think Mr Frodo should contact that goofball from Secret Aliens, you know that tanned numbskull that looks like he put two fingers into a power socket.  It sounds like a theory.
Report spam or abuse
+Gary Belliferous Yes sounds reasonable.
Report spam or abuse
Gigglebritches and her army of selves is very quiet lately. Shouldn't she be copy pasting furiously? Maybe she's out watching trees grow, using red herrings to aid her poor eyes?
Report spam or abuse
+Ijanea Riggs​ Goodbye. We'll miss you around here when you're gone.
Report spam or abuse
+Ijanea Riggs You give attitude then tell your victims to chill their attitude. Hypocrite. Evolution is a biological paradigm. But your links are religious sites. And you keep saying you're gone. You won't defend your religious sites. Hypocrite.
Report spam or abuse
Creationists, including ID creationists, pathologically misrepresent the facts, laws, logic, theories, history, philosophy, methods and BASIC TERMINOLOGY of science because they are science illiterates whose religious convictions make them fearful of scientific inquiry. Example: They HABITUALLY misrepresent the scientific terms theory, law, transitional, evolution, vestigial, &c. Science illiterates should not define science policy or science curricula or misinform children about basic science.
Report spam or abuse
+Fallible Fiend "False.  I believe the question is so ambiguous as to be meaningless..." Hahahahahahahahahahaha! So, you think that asking what the observation of a rock means is AMBIGUOUS, eh? Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! HOW then are you able to draw such EXTENSIVE conclusions from FOSSILS - WHICH ARE ROCKS - with such CERTITUDE? Hahahahahahahahahahahaha! "....  You are an uneducated liar." Hahahahahahahahahaha! Well, the question is whether the UNBIASED reader shares that view with you! That's all that really matters here, isn't it, FATS? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
+Zaki Aminu  Yes. It's obviously ambiguous to the point of meaninglessness to anyone who is not a complete idiot such as you.
Report spam or abuse
The video link below clearly shows why Creationism is not appropriate for children: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=9a3_1440199485
Report spam or abuse
Haha, it's a dunce.  "Macroevolution, speciation occurs over intervals that far exceed the human lifespan."    Diddly Squat forgets which side she is on, it's all out sock warfare, one schizo versus another.
Report spam or abuse
+Renekton Sock Account    It's not an accredited university, it's a church for gormless gits, you're probably a choir boy, open wide kid.
Report spam or abuse
+Renekton Sock Account A theological institution? So nothing scientific then.
Report spam or abuse
Of all the creationist red herrings, the one that sets me off the worst is "How could that animal live long enough for the right mutation to occur?". The problem is that to impart the level of understanding of the process of evolution for them to understand how wrong their question is would take weeks if not more. They say there are no dumb questions, but I think this particular one qualifies.
Report spam or abuse
+The CeIestial Coffeepot It's not my job to validate your invalid assumptions about evolution. Sorry, but you're sitting at the bottom of a dry apologetics well that your threw yourself into. Not my problem. ^_^
Report spam or abuse
Atheist: Are you a theist? Creationist: Yes, I have a PhD in creationology.. it's the central pseudoscience of Biblostupidchronophilology.
Report spam or abuse
+Zaki Aminu you speak too much sonny boy.
Report spam or abuse
+mapondo1600 "you speak too much sonny boy." You don't mind, do you? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
The fundies (all four of them, pretending to be ninety-four of them) are out tonight. Obviously there's been some fundamentalist horror story in the news they want to distract us from. Is it the destruction of ancient temples in Palmyra? Or something more directly anti-human and pro-death?
Report spam or abuse
Report spam or abuse
+10 Ton Steamroller  Reeeeeeeally know what, giggles?
Report spam or abuse
The fundamental difference between creationism and evolution is that creationism requires abject intellectual incompetence and pathological lying. Creationists are the ones who: Pathologically lie about what scientists have said, what other users have said, and about science. Impersonate other users. Have multiple sock accounts. Harass other users. Pathologically misrepresent what science is and how it works. Disable replies to their idiotic nonsense. Exaggerate and lie about their degrees and accomplishments. Habitually pretend to expertise they do not have. Quote mine - and then fail to even recognize that quote mining epitomizes intellectually dishonesty! When you're trying to understand the fake arguments here, note that evolution and creationism are not just "two different, but equal views." It's simple: The creationists are liars.
Report spam or abuse
Rejection of evolution happens all around the world, it's not unique to the united states but the united states have more people rejecting it then in other countries due to the intellectual capital It's unprofessional to try to observe the universe you don't believe in that you think was an accident that had almost no chance whatsoever of happening, it's also unprofessional to think that one day fish somehow magically got legs and started walking, it's fiction from darwin's fairy tales
Report spam or abuse
+Peter van der Meer Which one? The fiction or the truth? Stop trying to push your fairy tales and other fiction that darwin and biased scientists who are illiterates dreamed about
Report spam or abuse
Atheism is true??? Neil tyson disagrees with the baseless claim that "God is not real" which is only said by fools, the difference between the flying spagshit monster, fairies, monsters and santa is that belief in God was and now is and always was a scientific conclusion
Report spam or abuse
Robert Sparks is an idiot.
Report spam or abuse
+ClusterFuckRecords Seconded
Report spam or abuse
Giggles is having trouble sleeping again.
Report spam or abuse
+Cerebral Independence  No I don't like circuse giggles. Animal cruelty. What did they do to you? And how did you escape?
Report spam or abuse
Why must one believe in evolution to become an engineer?!
Report spam or abuse
Your computer is designed, your TV is designed, your shirt is designed, your glasses (which i know you atheists ware because you're unhealthy) are designed, science experiments are made my intelligent beings How your body isn't and it magically came into being from non-life? How does that even work? It doesn't even make sense, atheists are just willing to take the irrational risk to go to hell and delude them selves that their belief is rational but it's really an emotionally based belief that any non-biased and non-awful scientist would reject and mark as a result of emotions and not rational thinking Sorry, science is facts and evidence, not based on emotions
Report spam or abuse
+Zaki Aminu "do you think there is ANY ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE" Do you see the different words in the two definitions? That's why I think there is a difference. LMFAO Now let's examine your statement "something can't come from the absence or cessation of life or existence" In other words you are claiming that life or existence is eternal since it had to be there already for something or anything to come from it. Got any evidence to support that assertion. Of course you haven't, just some fatally flawed pseudologic.
Report spam or abuse
The chew toy said : "There is an elephant in the roomful of scientists who are trying to explain the development of life.   The elephant is labeled 'intelligent design.'" Too bad for her that intelligent design is not considered part of science. So her "elephant" is non-existant.
Report spam or abuse
+Atharkas "The records are there chew toy. You can check them for yourself." So LET THEM SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES, eh? Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
+Zaki Aminu Bwa ha ha ha! Look at Zaki trying to speak for the record again! How pathetic!
Report spam or abuse
I am roman catholic and I happen to agree with this 100%! YEC protestants deny the scientific evidence supporting evolution and they are ironically breaking one of the ten commandments and that commandment states that no one should bear false witness upon one's neighbor.
Report spam or abuse
+Blue Neptune "Yes, let's hope they can make the next leap lol." Hahahahahahahahahaha! WHAT IF THEY DON'T? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
Many atheists think that God creating hell is immoral, it's like giving someone a small reason to suicide, YOU made your self go to hell by being dumb enough to be an atheist, that's not a problem with the world, that's a problem with you, and we need to get very clear on that, if a loved one was an atheist and now he is in hell it's entirely his fault that he was an atheist, nobody forced him to so...
Report spam or abuse
Jesus is NOT: an imaginary friend Jesus ACTUALLY is: one of the most influential people to walk on earth
Report spam or abuse
+The Garloc Gibberber    Imaginary Jesus was a Jew, what religion are you again?
Report spam or abuse
"There is no rational, moral, immoral, pleasure seeking or shreya [sic] reason to be an atheist, there is no evidence for atheism, and yes atheism is just as much of a believe [sic] of faith as creationism is, just like believing in evolution (the part of it that disagrees with creationism) takes just as much faith as believing in creation if not more [sic]" It is hard to imagine how anyone could include quite so much nonsense in three lines, even if that were the intent. Atheism doesn't need a reason. It's the default state: not to accept or believe in propositions in the absence of evidence. It is the default that even people of faith adopt, with respect to nearly every god that was ever imagined. Atheism likewise requires no evidence. It's the most rational stance when no evidence exists. However, among the reasons many scientists are atheist, they are aware more than most that much of what people of faith believe isn't true: it's contradicted by empirical evidence. Evolution, properly understood, leads to that conclusion. Atheism isn't a belief. To be an atheist is to reject belief, just like not collecting stamps isn't a hobby. There is no belief in evolution. The theory of evolution depends on evidence, overwhelming evidence across several scientific disciplines. Creationism, in contrast, depends entirely on belief. It is supported by no evidence, and is contradicted by entire fields of scientific inquiry (Earth science, for example).
Report spam or abuse
Report spam or abuse
How stupid are atheists... let's find out... They are as stupid as someone who thinks that disbelieving that 1 + 1 = 2 is not the same as making a claim, if you are an atheist you make a claim that God is not real, if you don't believe in God then you are an atheist which means that you think there is no God, to say that there is no God is a claim, do you have any evidence? The burden of proof is on both sides, only the delusional don't accept that
Report spam or abuse
@the retard with the reply function off I could eat a bowl of alphabet soup and shit out a smarter statement than that  :/
Report spam or abuse
Atheism won't exist in a couple of sentries because 2:24
Report spam or abuse
Report spam or abuse
Geez, you are like a virus infesting Youtube, Dragon Slayer a.k.a. many other sock account names.
Report spam or abuse
+MrMezmerized "Geez, you are like a virus infesting Youtube, Dragon Slayer a.k.a. many other sock account names." You don't mind, do you? Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
Science doesn't care about what you believe and doesn't cover fairy tales about fish having legs or everything coming from nothing
Report spam or abuse
+Zaki Aminu Exactly, this guy is just a self deceptional atheist illiterate
Report spam or abuse
Report spam or abuse
"I now wish to give some reasons why I regard Darwinism as metaphysical, and as a research programme. It is metaphysical because it is not testable. One might think that it is. It seems to assert that, if ever on some plane we find life which satisfies conditions (a) and (b) then (c) will come into play and bring about in time a rich variety of distinct forma. Darwinism, however, does not assert as much as this. For assume that we find life on Mars consisting of exactly three species of bacteria with a genetic outfit similar to that of three terrestrial species. Is Darwinism refuted? By no means. We shall say that these three species were the only forms among the many mutants which were sufficiently well adjusted to survive. And we shall say the same if there is only one species (or none). Thus Darwinism does not really predict the evolution of variety.  It therefore can not really explain it. At best, it can predict the evolution of variety under "favourable conditions". But it is hardly possible to describe in general terms what favourable conditions are -- except that in their presence, a variety of forms will emerge.    And yet I believe I have taken the theory almost at its best -- almost in its most testable form. One might say that it "almost predicts" a great variety of forms of life in other fields, its predictive or explanatory power is still more disappointing. Take "adaptation". At first sight natural selection appears to explain it, and in a way it does; but hardly in a scientific way.  To say that a species now living is adapted to its environment is, in fact, almost tautological, indeed we use the terms "adaptation" and "selection" in such a way that we can say that, if the species were not adapted, it would have been eliminated by natural selection. Similarly, if a species has been eliminated it must have been ill adapted to the conditions. Adaptation of fitness is defined by modern evolutionists as survival value and can be measured by actual success in survival: there is hardly any possibility of testing a theory as feeble as this."   -   Karl Popper  (1902 – 94)  Professor of Logic and Scientific Method at the London School of Economic,    Unended Quest  (1992)  pp.198-199 † ************************************************************************************************ Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
+Atharkas "...."If you're NOT claiming it is YOUR "reality", aren't you saying you're NOT CONNECTED TO REALITY?" Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! There is no owner of reality Zaki...." BUT YOU THINK ONLY YOU OBSERVE IT CORRECTLY, eh? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "....You are just part of it but do not own it...." Didn't you just claim that I was DISCONNECTED from it? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "...However, you got to stop denying reality because of your silly god myth....." Hahahahahahaha! What I deny is YOUR "reality" - which claims that SOMETHING CAN COME OUT OF NOTHINGNESS and INFORMATION CAN COME OUT OF MEANINGLESSNESS! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "...."WHAT ELSE IS THAT BUT A DOGMATIC ATTITUDE?" Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! So to you being rational is being dogmatic?...." Hahahahahahahahahaha! Things are NOT rational because YOU call them "rational", you know? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "...Just like being a scientist is being an atheist, right Zaki?..." A supposed "scientist", such as Dawkins, Coyne, or Krauss, who RULES OUT EVEN THE POSSIBILITY OF GOD'S EXISTENCE is VERY CLEARLY and ATHEIST! Is this not so? HahahahahahahahahahahaI "...."That is merely an ASSERTION BASED ON IGNORANCE - which can simply be IGNORED WITHOUT FURTHER ADO!" Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "...Like your claim that a god exist or that evolution is false. Good of you to admit that your claims can be ignored as the raving of a mentally challenged individual...." Well, LET THE RECORD SPEAK FOR ITSELF AND PEOPLE DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES, eh? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "...."Haven't you just said that whatever you have no evidence for does not exist?" Hahahahahahahahahahahaha! Nope, didn't made that claim either. You got to stop pulling straws Zaki....." Hahahahahahahahahahaha! You're SO CONFUSED now! Didn't you just say that God does not Exist because you have no evidence for His Existence? Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "...."You've, CLEARLY, HAD ENOUGH!" Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Really? It seems you are the one losing ground here Zaki. Is it because the records is against you? Or because you are incapable of making a single argument or saying what it is I'm claiming? You really are bad at it today, perhaps you need some rest? Want me to call your lover Owen so you can rest your tired head on his chest?" Hahahahahahahahahahaha! You've, CLEARLY, HAD ENOUGH! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
I am a cunty delusional atheist with the name of mike in real life, but since i think it's awful i renamed my self to mikecucunt, i am a sock account of fallible fiend and a moron
Report spam or abuse
Damp Dung Sprayer recently sprayed: Poor evolutionists [sic], your theory hinges on the probabilities of random, chance nucleotide copying errors having somehow designed the millions of novel proteins which explain all of life's diversity. The burden of proof is squarely on your narrow little shoulders to demonstrate that this whole idea is even plausible from a probability point of view. Her impoverished brain then proceeds to come to the conclusion that the source of diversity of life is her even less PLAUSIBLE sky wizard (which she still doesn't have the courage to name - she has the balls only to hint at its existence). This is known as the fallacy of personal incredulity combined with god designer of the gaps, i.e. "I find the natural explanation too astonishing to believe, and in the absence of anything else that makes sense to me, I postulate a sky wizard designer who is a very tricky fellow because he's very good at playing hide-and-seek." One has to wonder if she is using the apparent look of design of organisms to prove her Gawd designer exists in the absence of any other evidence, or if she is using her imperceptible, intangible Gawd designer to prove organisms were designed.
Report spam or abuse
Look evolution is fake point blank period. It was proven wrong. Creatism is REAL. God is REAL. Jesus Christ is REAL. Heaven and Hell IS REAL. Turn your life over to Jesus NOW before its too late because Jesus is coming back soon amd taking his chruch with him.
Report spam or abuse
Bill nye said in other big think videos "If humans were designed then why don't they have more than just hands arms etc. and why aren't they stronger, smarter etc." If humans had, for example: claws, they would be used to harm others, that wouldn't help anyone! Bill nye is using 500 year old arguments that got disproven many times, one of them is also "who created God, he didn't come out of nothing" when it's very clear that God is eternal, everyone knows this Even darwin's parents and even his own flying carpet disagrees with his atheist claims
Report spam or abuse
A mechanistic explanation is a description of how something COULD have happened. It's not as good as direct observation so when we observe changes in species, like the London Underground mosquito, not explaining the change doesn't mean the change didn't happen.
Report spam or abuse
+matchlock fun Hahahahahahahahaha! As is the case, eventually, with all liars, Darwinists can't tell the difference between what is a GENUINE perception and one that is locally generated by their own minds - their own LIES! Extreme PREJUDICE causes this! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
How to be an evolutionist. First you must believe that evolution is fact. If you don't believe that evolution is scientific fact then you will never see it. Why? Because the mountain of evidence that shows miniscule genetic changes in organisms doesn't show LARGE Darwinian changes so we have to fill in the difference with imagination. Imagining small changes equals large changes is evolution and if you don't believe in evolution you won't see it. Creationists know that science isn't the imagination but evolutionists don't know that. In their mind it all makes sense and it may but it is not real. The theory of evolution proposed in the 19th century was presented before any observation of it was seen. For 150 years we have been trying to get life to evolve as Darwin suggested but life doesn't want to cooperate with Darwin. So if you want to see evolution you have to imagine it happening in the future and imagine that what we see when we look at fossils was evolution in our past. Evolution lives in anytime but the present and if you don't believe in it then you can't imagine it and you won't see it. If evolution is impossible then ALL interpretations of fossils and small changes will be forced to change. Evolution as it's imagined contradicts the Genesis account and I assert it's the only reason why we are being asked to imagine it.
Report spam or abuse
+Blue Neptune "They all run when you ask them that, but I"ll try to.  +Robert Sparks How old do you think the Earth is?" I already told mikecucuk, however old the Bible says it is.
Report spam or abuse
its just as stupid to think that something comes from nothing or that nothing never existed. but I still rather believe that a god created the universe and life simply because if not, whats the purpose of being human? It makes more sense to me to think that we are actually here on purpose, rather than just being the cause of a spontaneous chain of chaotic events. im not a creationist by the way. i just believe in God.
Report spam or abuse
+cesar fresnillo   Mmmm, no actually, there is plenty of evidence that the Big Bang happened and that it's still banging, no one within physics or the sane world disputes this, the insane world claims to know the origins of the universe and that it was a supernatural event without a single atom of evidence. There is mathematical evidence that universal inflation is a natural event, called the de Broglie/Bohm Quantum Trajectory Theory, no gods needed, look it up.  So I have mathematical evidence, the entire fields of 21st century theoretical and particle physics and you have a 4th century book filled with demons, ghosts, spirits, giants, lion men, satyrs, cockatrices, human faced locusts and talking animals.  Not much of a selection for an honest man, IMO. 
Report spam or abuse
The facts. What the scientists are actually saying. No need to make it up. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11876/science-evolution-and-creationism
Report spam or abuse
+Grand Tournament Sock Account As one who is oblivious and hostile to facts and logic, your opinion on the subject is irrelevant.
Report spam or abuse
Bill is right, Creationism is horrible for the future of this world. Humans came from single/multi-cell organisms, to tiny sea life, to ancient fish-like creatures, to apes, to humans. Feel free to hate PLEASE!
Report spam or abuse
+HooDini Hahahahahahahahahahaha! WHY do you think that SOMETHING CAN COME OUT OF MEANINGLESSNESS? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
Report spam or abuse
It's not professional to try to observe the universe without believing the big bang happened
Report spam or abuse
@Owned fatkins that is your self deception
Report spam or abuse
Atheists have no arguments against creationism
Report spam or abuse
Zaki Aminu: To indoctrinate a small impressionable child into a religion which uses fear of eternal damnation as a vise is highly unethical, and that child will likely spend his or her life struggling with the question of will they go to hell should they decide to shelf christian theology in favor of the pursuit of their own intellectual potential...I say that's a form of child abuse. You can teach morality and ethics to a child without having to resort to fear tactics...
Report spam or abuse
+thomas jewell "To indoctrinate a small impressionable child into a religion which uses fear of eternal damnation as a vise is highly unethical...." WHY? Don't you think that children should be shown the right way in life? Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "...and that child will likely spend his or her life struggling with the question of will they go to hell should they decide to shelf christian theology in favor of the pursuit of their own intellectual potential.." Hahahahahahahahahahahaha! HOW does BEING MORAL prevent one from pursuing the development of one's intellectual potential? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "....I say that's a form of child abuse...." WHO CARES WHAT YOU SAY! It's for parents to bring up their children - in a way that is in accordance with the law of the land! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "...You can teach morality and ethics to a child without having to resort to fear tactics..." Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Without PAINFUL CONSEQUENCES, there is NO REASON for ANYONE to avoid doing wrong things! Conversely, without PLEASANT CONSEQUENCES, there is NO REASON to continue persevering with correct actions! One learns ONLY through getting FEEDBACK from one's actions! Didn't you know that? And this applies equally to humans as to animals and machines! As one sows, so one reaps! Fair's fair! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
Dozy **Sock Puppet* Bill Nye* farted out the following: Your "lottery logic" is a logical fail. Lotteries are intelligently designed, as I've just explained, with intelligently controlled parameters, including outcomes. So you're saying that lotteries are rigged to produce a pre-determined array of numbers to match those on a ticket bought at a pre-determined corner store by a pre-determined buyer at a pre-determined time in a pre-determined city in a pre-determined state in the U.S.? Do you even know what a lottery is and how it even works? LMAO XD Multiple, simultaneous mutations capable of [sic] confering survival and/or reproductive fitness advantages to organisms is utterly random and, UNLIKE THE LOTTERY, blind and unguided!! Your incredulity does not automatically mean that there is an intelligent designer out there. The exact nature of the process does not invalidate the fact that it can and has happened in the distant past - consider life a very, very, very, very improbable lottery win. If you can't, then that's your fault, not mine. You LOSE, Mike! I've certainly lost... my ability to hold in my laughter after reading your bilge. ROTFLMAO XD Now, can we get someone else in here who knows what they're talking about when they're railing against evolution?
Report spam or abuse
Most children in the USA get bad grades and are poorly educated, being atheists would make it worse beyond belief
Report spam or abuse
Yawn, so many messages/copy from an ID website, and not a single things which actually makes the scientific theory of evolution false. Is that all the chew toy have? Baseless assertions?
Report spam or abuse
Evolution has never left the 19th century. To date it remains the only supposed physical phenomenon that has never been seen or tested. Without experiment there is no way to know if a theory is possible. For 150 years evolution has failed to show itself in the lab and I suspect it isn't a real phenomenon. What else can I think? Every other asserted physical phenomenon for the last 500+ years has made it's way into the 21st century except evolution. It's the lone holdout that stubbornly will not show itself. There is a mountain of physical evidence for small change in organisms but nothing to suggest large changes can happen over time and that an organism can survive these changes. I don't think they can and amazingly there is no evidence that contradicts that statement.
Report spam or abuse
What really holds everybody back: people being stupid enough to believe that humans came from banana licking dinosaurs and that everything came from nothing
Report spam or abuse
+Tylerosaurus PRECISELY! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! MORALITY is the ONLY THING that holds back LICENTIOUS behaviour, which atheists are COMMITTED TO! And MORALITY IS ROOTED IN THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE WILL OF GOD! This is why atheists are DESPERATE to smother - if at all possible! As PARASITES, they rely on the dangers they pose not being recognized by their intended victims until it is too late! For that, they require the darkness of IGNORANCE OF THE WILL OF GOD, and therefore IGNORANCE of GOD HIMSELF, to fall upon their target!
Report spam or abuse
All that complex specificity of genetic material reduced to the role of doormat and place-holder, recovering secondary rudimentary function - what evolution would predict of a vestigial structure. Last I heard, as much as 70% of the human genome has no discernible biological function. It's a 'wasteland' (Encode's Ewan Birney, 2014). I use junk to hold other junk. Is that an irreducibly complex function?
Report spam or abuse
+Peritrichous Dominatur   You're lucky you live in Mummy's house in Seattle.  If you lived in Oz you spend half your life on your vestigial tail bone. 
Report spam or abuse
"theory of evolution is utterly useless and unable to serve up an explanation for how and why human consciousness emerged" Can you spell Strawman Fallacy. LMFAO
Report spam or abuse
how sad :( I grew up watching his videos, but not knowing he a was an atheist... Ill pray for you Bill... I used to be loat juat like you, but Jesus saved me and that's no lie... When people would tell me are you saved? have you accepted god? I would say no or not yet, I didn't think it would be real, untill one day I did and my whole life changed... Ill pray for you Bill and all the people that follow you...
Report spam or abuse
+McRotty "hmm. fuck you" Forget it, FAGGOT! I'm NOT into SHIT HOLE FUCKING! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
This is dogmatic in its own way and blind to other parts of reality that science doesn't so easily observe like the mind, the heart, and the soul. The material world exists and science can prove and solve things in the material world but to think of concrete science as the only thing there is is to be creating a new dogma or religion of your own . There are limitations to science and being in denial of that and turning it into a religion is why we have such problems in the MD and science community today . For instance, people are over medicated with psychiatric drugs even in cases of mild or moderate depression when the core of psychiatric problems is actually psychological problems and for that you need a good therapist you can trust and an understanding of psychology and the mind . Concrete religious zealots like bill nye would more likely push the myth that the psychiatric problems are the core of the problem and the solution is to just Medicate everyone. That's the easiest way to make the symptoms go away immediately and make the patient not a problem as soon as possible but in many cases its counter productive to the long term goals of a depressed person to understand and control their own mind and get in touch with their heart and soul which all do exist in each human but people like bill nye live in their own psychologically disconnected world where they believe that only the solid material world exists. That dysfunction is caused by a fear deep down to admit that we are much more powerless than we think and our limitations are defined to a point and we are all most likely not alone in the universe and almost certainly not the most powerful elements of existence.
Report spam or abuse
+Nicholas Christie-Blick   So true, we'll let the record speak for itself, we can just sit back smirking enjoying a hot cup of tea. 
Report spam or abuse
@Ergono-moron learn to spell before trying to argue with someone who is clearly owning you, also learn the sons name first, it's billy from bill, but you can't fire your neurons because of your lack of brain cells, i better remove half of my brain cells then comment so that i can agree with you... oh wait, there is no point in living in your illusion of a world view!
Report spam or abuse
+Anti-Atheist Potato Sock Account Leave the mental retard alone, easy win for you against the econo-boober
Report spam or abuse
+Anti-Atheist Potato Sock Account Bill Nye's only child is a daughter named Charity, born in 2003.Again, what planet are you on?
Report spam or abuse
I disagree, religion won't affect or halt scientific innovation or progression in the future, I mean we have to look at the past so we can predict the future. From 1800s to Today We've advanced technology and sciences at a very rapid pace, and I see it only increasing even further in the future.
Report spam or abuse
+Peter van der Meer I mentioned that time period, even though it wasn't the "Age of Enlightenment" period, because in that little window of human history a lot of things changed majorly in scientific discovery and progression. I don't really care for the times before that, even though some huge revelations were indeed discovered before the mentioned time period. All I'm simply trying to say is that if we look at recent history science has not been "held back" by religion. We don't even need to get into technical shit to see that obviously we're only getting more and more advanced in the future, we're in the 21st century it's highly unlikely we'll be receding.
Report spam or abuse
Report spam or abuse
+sara carlson Yeah, he's a PREACHER OF ATHEISM! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
PUBLIC NOTICE Unlike some resident sock puppeteers and grief-spreading trolls here (you know who you are), people in this forum actually have a life beyond their computers and need to attend to the responsibilities that come with life. It has nothing to do with people going missing, being exiled (HA!), or having passed on. QED, Dozy Bill Nye. ;)
Report spam or abuse
+Gary Belliferous All finished. I started off with three. I'll wait to see if it catches on.
Report spam or abuse
+mikecucuk   I've just crawled out of bed and I'm off to work.  Go to Google+ click on communities, type into search bar 'Atheism Humour & Memes', click join community and post your memes. Better still I'll send you an invitation. 
Report spam or abuse
There is no evidence that evolution is real eigher
Report spam or abuse
Humans are the result of the natural selection of millions of 'beneficial' mutations.  The term 'beneficial' is difficult to comprehend. Random mutations aren't just a simpletons three distinct types, deleterious, neutral and advantageous, there is a continuum of mutations from highly deleterious to weakly deleterious, nearly neutral to neutral, weakly advantageous and strongly advantageous, it's a continuum. The effectiveness of selection on a mutation depends on the fitness effect of this mutation, the selection coefficient and on the population size.
Report spam or abuse
+mikecucuk  Correction, a selective smartarse. 
Report spam or abuse
Report spam or abuse
Ofc atheism won't exist in a couple sentries, there is no evidence for the unhealthy world view of the blind WHY would you be an atheist? Just WHY?
Report spam or abuse
+Rumble Sock Account The world becomes insanely complicated when you don't believe in creation, here we are having complicated working bodies that were just some kind of magical accident?
Report spam or abuse
wow still with the sock accounts gibbering to themselves while others disallow replies desperation fills the air
Report spam or abuse
+Zaki Aminu re peat your self like a robot lol are you saying atheist make you guys crazy
Report spam or abuse
+falseflagattack1 "re peat your self like a robot lol are you saying atheist make you guys crazy" I'm saying that atheists are not keen on FACTS and LOGIC - as your comments demonstrate! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
I simply CAN'T SEE what it is one is missing out by simply IGNORING Darwinism COMPLETELY! I mean, there are NO PRACTICAL BENEFITS WHATSOEVER that result from knowing what it claims - and, to date, NO USEFUL APPLICATIONS OF IT HAVE EVER BEEN FOUND! SO - EVEN IF IT IS CORRECT - WHAT GOOD IS IT? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! I MUCH PREFER carrying on as I am! If I die in my present state, I WOULD HAVE MISSED OUT ON NOTHING if it turns out my expectations of what come after this life are wrong! If they're right though then I would have lived my life in a way that puts me in an advantageous position in the Afterlife! If it turns out atheists are wrong, they face an ETERNITY IN HELL! And, if they're right, THEY'RE NO BETTER OFF THAN ME! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
+werriboy55 "Being unable to demonstrate your existence mat be upsetting to you, I don't worry about it..." Hahahahahahahahaha! Well, I suppose if you have NOTHING in your bank account, you don't worry about people gaining unauthorized access to it either, do you? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "...You think Logic is perfect which means you don't understand Logic...." Hahahahahahahahahahaha! You have CORRUPTED your connection with LOGIC - and have substituted a CARICATURE of it in the place it should occupy in your mind, Dag! That's all! I mean, HOW can you even claim to have UNDERSTANDING of ANYTHING if you're actually saying that LOGIC is NOT PERFECT? If 2+2=4 is not regarded by one to be a PERFECTLY CORRECT STATEMENT, but can be something else sometimes, HOW IS IT POSSIBLE FOR ONE TO CLAIM ONE UNDERSTANDS ARITHMETIC? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! ".....As for Truth being perfect, who knows. Facts are real, truth is in the eye of the beholder." Hahahahahahahahahaha! Again you have substituted a CARICATURE of TRUTH into the place it should occupy in your mind - and so you're not PLAGUED BY DOUBTS! So much so that you do not even realize that TRUTH, FACT, and REALITY are ONE AND THE SAME THING! NATURALLY, AT THE SAME TIME, YOU DO NOT KNOW WHETHER OR NOT YOU EVEN EXIST! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
If you believe there is no God then you are being dishonest, you have no evidence, no arguments, let alone proof, atheists make the claim that there is no God but can never support it
Report spam or abuse
+Intimidating Belief in god is not a scientific conclusion.  You're obliviousness to science is not science.
Report spam or abuse
Re: "Creationism Is Not Appropriate For Children" Jesus said:  "But at the beginning of creation God 'made them male and female.' - Mark 10:6 and Jesus said, "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these." - Matthew 19:14 Jesus never told a lie, we were created. Children should hear about the truth.
Report spam or abuse
Intelligent Design proponent +Chocolate Coated Reason states the following: "if there is not a gradual route to their production" as a requirement when design is evident. Fair enough in itself but how do we know if there is no 'gradual route'. This is where the whole idea of 'irreducible complexity' falls flat on its face. Its an argument from ignorance; not knowing if there is a gradual route does not mean there is none.
Report spam or abuse
+Peritrichous Dominatur The default position of something that is not known is unknown, not implausible. 
Report spam or abuse
Creationists literally own this forum, we are rational and critical thinkers who aren't scared easily by baseless claims of atheists who have no evidence whatsoever so they try to confuse others into believing their belief and claim
Report spam or abuse
Report spam or abuse
Brains Fallingout recently grunted: we look outside the window, we go out into the woods, or even into the jungle...and without exception, every single living thing appears to be designed for optimal adaptation to its habitat. and almost hit the nail on the head when she used the word "appears". Unfortunately, she carried on in using Douglas Adams's puddle logic in thinking how well adapted she is to her own environment.
Report spam or abuse
The new law in the USA: being an atheist is illegal
Report spam or abuse
@All-Hail-Disorderdick You are very bad with words and English just like you are bad at converting people
Report spam or abuse
+Renekton Sock Account He's a SECOND CLASS German! He has some Red Army genes in him acquired from the Russian sex party in Berlin and the rest of the Third Reich in 1945
Report spam or abuse
If you were an Apostle (John), and exiled to an island by a Roman Emperor, you would certainly find it more interesting to imagine and write about your dreams, rather than smash rocks together all day, and think about your exile.
Report spam or abuse
Report spam or abuse
+McRotty "The Borg are too" Glad to hear that also! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
Crabs prey on snails with thin shells, but they cannot eat snails that have thick shells. Snails can somehow tell if crabs are around. In the presence of crabs, they grow a thick shell. This adaptation clearly helps protect the snails from the crabs. Snails are themselves predators, preying on barnacles. In the presence of snails, barnacles are known to protect themselves by growing into a bent-over shape that keeps the snails from eating it. When there are no snails around, the barnacle resumes its habitual straight body form.
Report spam or abuse
On the face of it, organisms unequivocally demonstrate phenotypic alterations which derive from a built-in capacity to adapt to their environment. And to the extent that this occurs, it does so at the level of the organism, not at the level of the population, as per evolutionist dogma.   No change in the genome is necessary for the organism to demonstrate enhanced survival fitness.
Report spam or abuse
”…that is, species appear in the fossil sequence very suddenly, show little or no change during their existence, then abruptly disappear." These are not negligible gaps. They are periods, in all the major evolutionary transitions, when immense physiological changes had to take place. Even among biologists, the idea that new organs, and thus higher categories, could develop gradually through tiny improvements has often been challenged.
Report spam or abuse
+Common Dissent Yet more recycled creationist nonsense. The fossil record is full of transitional forms. There is no debate in the academic science community about the reality of evolution. The frontiers of research relate to the arcane details of what happened, and how it happened, not whether it happened.
Report spam or abuse
I will be happy enough with an explanation based on FACTS and LOGIC ALONE - EVEN IF THERE IS NO DOCUMENTATION OF SUCH AN EXPLANATION IN ANY SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL! But all atheists seem capable of doing is PARROTING the NONSENSE Dawkins and co. drop from their intellectual back passages; feasting on them as if they were delicacies! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
+Transtlan Tico Hahahahahahahahahaha! THEORETICAL MODELS are BY DEFINITION - JUST GUESSES! And STATISTICAL EVENTS are IMPOSSIBLE in the absence of an AGENCY CAPABLE OF MAKING DECISIONS - i.e. INTELLIGENCE! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! All you have without INTELLIGENCE are EVENT SPACES - BUT NO EVENTS! DICE NEVER THROW THEMSELVES - NOR DO CARDS PICK THEMSELVES OUT OF A PACK - EVER! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
+Transtlan Tico "so I name theoretical models that are capable of predicting future DNA mutations by hybridization and you still deny it?" I don't need to deny anything in that paper because nothing in it is damaging to the creation model. The word "mutation" appears only once in that entire paper and what they say isn't even conclusive: "The evolutionary nature of the Metropolis algorithm and simulated annealing has been studied as a possible evolutionary mutation operator (Droste et al., 2001)." Secondly, just because the word "evolution" or "evolutionary" appears in a research paper, that is not necessarily a confirmation of the neo-Darwinian /evolutionary model which posits that all life descended from one primordial lifeform. "Evolution" can simply mean "change" (which the creation model supports) as opposed to "change from bacteria to mammal" which the Darwinian model posits and is illustrated by Darwin's tree of life with a single trunk. If you think there is something in this paper that supports the latter, then reference it. I saw nothing that falsifies the creation model's Biblical "kinds" that are depicted by multiple trees from which all life descended. I want to remind you that the multiple trees in the creation model (see http://goo.gl/kveDVG) don't look like telephone poles representing "fixity of species" but have branches and therefore acknowledge and expect evolutionary change but not the change that Darwin imagined: "Therefore I should infer from analogy that probably all the organic beings which have ever lived on this earth have descended from some one primordial form, into which life was first breathed." - Charles Darwin, Origin of Species, 1959
Report spam or abuse
"Many human genomic regions previously assumed to be nonfunctional have recently been found to be teeming with biochemical activity ". (Encode, Kellis et al, 2014)  "It’s clear that 80% of the genome has a specific biochemical activity – whatever that might be." (Encode leader Ewan Birney, on his blog 2013) "For me, the big important thing of ENCODE is that we found that a lot of the genome had some kind of biochemical activity . And we do describe that as “biochemical function”, but that word “function” in the phrase “biochemical function”is the thing which gets confusing. If we use the phrase “biochemical activity”, that’s precisely what we did, we find that the different parts of the genome, [??] 80% have some specific biochemical event we can attach to it ." (Ewan Birney, BBC interview, 2013) "The 80% claim, he (Encode's Kellis) says, was misunderstood and misreported. Roughly that proportion of the genome might be biochemically active , he explains, but some of that activity is undoubtedly meaningless , leaving unanswered the question of how much of it is really 'functional'." (Nature, may 2014) We are clearly not talking about 80% biological function of human genes. There's no such thing.
Report spam or abuse
+Gary Belliferous Aparently they got a Bible without Genesis.
Report spam or abuse
+Robert Sparks   They have bibles but they've half a functioning brain as well. 
Report spam or abuse
Claim and belief:    Has evidence: You have a reason to believe it                                                                               Creationism                     X                              X Atheism                           No                              No Science                           X                              X Evolution                         X                              X We all know what the fucked idiocy is
Report spam or abuse
+Aaron Z "Well first, my points are derived from objective reasoning...." HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT? Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "...Second, you don't seem to have any points..." Hahahahahahahahahaha! HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "...so how can you criticize mine?" Well, you're simply MAKING ASSERTIONS WITHOUT SUBSTANTIATING THEM, aren't you? Hahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
I'm not making any assertions, we've discussed this. My assertion is that you haven't provided any evidence for your assertion, which you haven't. All you've said is that since the universe exists, god had to have made it, but this isn't true. All the universe's existence means is that the universe had to have came about somehow. There is no evidence that that somehow was god. 
Report spam or abuse
+whoisbrucewayne recently spewed: Evolution is not repeatable, testable or observable. Its not real science Apparently she is completely unaware of forensics.
Report spam or abuse
+Common Dissent It's endlessly entertaining to watch you run away like a frightened jack rabbit when a very simple question such as this is posted: What is the name of your sky wizard, or are you an atheist?
Report spam or abuse
There are no transitional links and intermediate forms in either the fossil record or the modern world. Therefore, there is no actual evidence that evolution has occurred in the past or present. Although evolutionists state that life resulted from non-life, matter resulted from nothing, and humans resulted from animals. Each of these is an impossibility of science and the natural world. Evolution is not repeatable, testable or observable. Its not real science. how can you tell an atheist is lying? Their mouths moving.
Report spam or abuse
"believing in evolution (the part of it that disagrees with creationism)" You mean ALL of evolution! LMFAO
Report spam or abuse
+Zaki Aminu So there are two types of intelligent design; the mundane kind that we can observe and just adapts existing conditions and the unobservable kind that creates the conditions it uses. A "special" sort of ID in other words. How do you intend to show that this "special" ID exists?
Report spam or abuse
Cerebral Is-Defenseless farted out the following: 1) New top posts that push older ones down the page,  Which you do unabashedly with a deluge of copy-and-paste quotes from your army of sock puppet accounts in total violation of YouTube's guidelines. 2) Replies to posts Which you disable without batting an eyelid and without a twitch of hypocrisy in your eyes. Being an IDiot sure suppressed your feelings of guilt, remorse, and introspection. It's my understanding you can choose which list you prefer to use. ...(yawn) And I choose to enable replies, which I've yet to see you do even once. What's the matter? Did your balls drop off when you rage quit last year?
Report spam or abuse
+mikecucuk  Haha, a douche bag doesn't need a condom. 
Report spam or abuse
+Gary Belliferous At least a douche bag is clean. She's more of a douche nozzle.
Report spam or abuse
https://vimeo.com/37049851 please refer to Noam Chomsky to attempt to explain to uni-dimensional thinkers what the problems are with evolution that remain unaccounted for. There is a real hard agenda by people who only pay attention to the external and mind-independent world but it's a delusion because everything we perceive has to be interpreted by our minds In order to understand the simplest concepts or logic. Therefore our understanding of existence and reality is limited to what we can perceive since it has to pas through that filter in order to exist. Without sentient minds to perceive the world, the material world doesn't exist and is therefore absolutely useless if you believe that that's all there is. It's a psychological dysfunction to only accept the material world and to not accept our limits of perception.
Report spam or abuse
+Daniel Benitez I still find it funny you were giving thanks to two 'real people' for being compassionate and mindful and one of those people you were thanking was an account impersonating another account.
Report spam or abuse
Dear America, We unreservedly apologize for giving you Ken Ham. He is an idiot. Can we still be friends? Sincerely, Australia.
Report spam or abuse
+McRotty "Seen Brian Moonan's website?.. it's warped beyond what Ken Ham does." Maybe it's the way you're looking at it! I mean, if YOUR vision is WARPED....! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
Weird how some try to claim intelligent design is a scientific theory... when it's not even considered an hypothesis in science. Kind of show how they are disconnected from reality in general.
Report spam or abuse
+Atharkas "Awwww! Sorry chew toy, but while I do accept the theory of evolution, I don't have to make any claim about it since, once again, there is no debate about it's validity! It's not my fault you are disconnected from reality!" So, holding onto Darwinism is just an act of BLIND FAITH by you which cannot be influenced by LOGICAL ARGUMENT, eh? Well, that cleared that up! Why didn't you say so earlier? It would saved people thinking they could make you think about what you believe! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
+Zaki Aminu Logical argument? Bwaaa ha ha ha! Good one Zaki! The entire record of the last three years shows you are incapable of making one! No blind faith in a scientific theory Zaki, but it's so fun to see you squirm at the realization that your god/designer idea is not even considered a possibility.
Report spam or abuse
Atheism will not be accepted by any normal person, the non-proven evolution is widely criticed in the united states and rightfully so Most people who become atheists do so because of: Masturbation, very violent bad Media, stealing, lying, anger issues,other sins If the religion of the person that is an atheist now is against the sins then the atheist will quit their religion because they want to continue sinning
Report spam or abuse
+Chocolate Converted Reason SPOT ON! But I must confess I didn't realize WANKING was so widespread amongst atheists!
Report spam or abuse
There is so much evidence for the existance of God that atheists are willfully ignorant to because they know it proves them wrong and that atheism is not even acceptable by a normal person, in some countries atheism is considered a cult of idiots who are staying close minded forever
Report spam or abuse
+Snuffleupagus Atheism is cancer of the soul before it becomes cancer of the mind, why would a normal person reject belief in God? There is no actual reason, this is really important, it's the proof that atheists are or mentally ill or have poisoned souls that poison their minds after that and their world view then fits into the science of criticised evolution The part of evolution that disagrees with creationism is widely criticised in the USA, noone will accept it as a fact because everyone knows it's a claim with no evidence for it
Report spam or abuse
What do atheists have in menu for us... Ergono-moron, the gorilla gibbering fool, the nicholas cristie-blocked and the apple guy who stalks others in the comments but is very sensitive
Report spam or abuse
+Chocolate Cupped Reason Atheists remind me HIT MEN who URINATE IN TERROR and start WHIMPERING when they get a TELLING OFF from an old lady! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
+Chocolate Cupped Reason Chocolate Cupped Reason: Sock account. Blocked.
Report spam or abuse
Conscious thoughts and intentions - supposedly the natural capacities bestowed upon humans by undirected physical evolution - are more immediately real to a human than any objective reality, yet they resist all attempts at being objectively weighed, measured, imaged, or quantified by any and all physical methods.
Report spam or abuse
Who cares what the top US scientists think? According to the National Academy of Science press: "Creationism, intelligent design, and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science. These claims subordinate observed data to statements based on authority, revelation, or religious belief."
Report spam or abuse
+matchlockfun I'm here to show the delusion atheists are under. Nothing more.
Report spam or abuse
+Robert Sparks And yet you're untrained in the life sciences, and not knowledgeable about what atheism entails. Thus you are merely a youtube evangelist, aka a troll, or predator. To become something more relevant, or more worthwhile, offer testable evidence for not just the existence of an all-powerful creaor, but its identity as a jealous anthropomorphic admirer of Israel.
Report spam or abuse
Evolution certainly without doubt exists of course..... ...But does it explain our beginnings? We could be some experiment from another species? 100 years we could certainly create a life form on another planet, so it is not impossible others did.  Not that I say that is what happened but there are more options to explore...just sayin.
Report spam or abuse
Tetrapods From Poland Trample the Tiktaalik School of Evolution Tracks of footprints found in a quarry in Poland have turned the palaeontological world upside down.1 For years there has been a neat evolutionary story about how fish evolved four legs and came out of the ocean onto the land.  Probably the most famous fossil in this sea-to-land icon of evolution is Tiktaalik roseae, a fish with fins that was claimed to have had features intermediate between fish and tetrapods.
Report spam or abuse
So what can the sugar code do exactly? Studies using monoclonal antibodies have shown that cell-surface glycans in early mouse embryos change in a highly ordered and stage-specific manner; the data suggest that they mediate cellular orientation, migration, and responses to regulatory factors during development.
Report spam or abuse
My dad bill sure messed up with this video, but i won't do the same, i won't be a liar who doesn't know science when i grow up like he is, I AM BILLY AND BILL IS A LIAR, BUT I WILL BE BETTER, I AM HIS SON, BILLY!
Report spam or abuse
+Billy the son of bill nye Hahahahahahahahahaha! Good lad! Given you're his son, maybe your dad is not as FAGGOTY as he looks after all! Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
+Billy the son of bill nye Billy the son of bill nye: Sock account. Blocked.
Report spam or abuse
There is no good argument that atheism is true, however there are many arguments that theism is true, both are claims, ideas and beliefs, atheists have tried to disprove theism and christianity for many years but always failed The reason everything exists is because of the big bang, but what was the cause of the big bang? Nothing can come from nothing, what atheists are saying is like saying that information can come from not knowing things The being that created the big bang must be transcendent, timeless and a personal mind, If the earth was just a little bit closer to the sun, we wouldn't exist, if the universe was just a little bit different at the beginning, it wouldn't exist, our bodies being practical and complicated like this can't be an accident, this is ALL fine-tunning There is no multiverse, no infinite universes can exist because infinity is just an idea If God does not exist then real moral values don't exist, an atheist cannot have any morals whatsoever, an action like rape is not socially good but it does nothing to prove that it's bad for the one raping, for an atheist there is nothing wrong or bad with rape unless it's being done to a loved one or the atheist Actions like rape and murder are moral abominations but for an atheist they are not actually immoral Also if God does not exist then how did jesus have a miracle? You can also know that God exists without arguments evidence or proof but from experience
Report spam or abuse
+lordlandraid You're a loser, no body likes you :) you have no friends
Report spam or abuse
How do people still believe in this shit?  Creationism should have died out hundreds of years ago.
Report spam or abuse
ENCODE Project Writes EULOGY For Junk DNA March 25, 2013 - When researchers first sequenced the human genome, they were astonished by how few traditional genes encoding proteins were scattered along those 3 billion DNA bases. Instead of the expected 100,000 or more genes, the initial analyses found about 35,000 and that number has since been whittled down to about 21,000. In between were megabases of “junk,” or so it seemed.
Report spam or abuse
This week, 30 research papers, including six in Nature and additional papers published by Science, sound the death knell for the idea that our DNA is mostly littered with useless bases.  A decadelong project, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE), has found that 80% of the human genome serves some purpose, biochemically speaking.
Report spam or abuse
“I don’t think anyone would have anticipated even close to the amount of sequence that ENCODE has uncovered that looks like it has functional importance,” says John A. Stamatoyannopoulos, an ENCODE researcher at the University of Washington, Seattle.
Report spam or abuse
nye is right inview of the ignorant tripe below dinosaurs and bananas did not coexist this video isnt about atheism which makes no claims
Report spam or abuse
+falseflagattack1 "nye is right inview of the ignorant tripe below dinosaurs and bananas did not coexist...." Well, bully for you and him! WHY are you not satisfied with being right and still feel "HELD BACK" by these so-called "ignorant" people then? WHY NOT GO ON YOUR OWN WAY AND LEAVE THEM ALONE TO WALLOW IN THEIR "ignorance"? WHY do you feel you NEED them - and their children? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!_* "...this video isnt about atheism which makes no claims." Yeah, right! Tell that to the birds! Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
Conducting psychological warfare upon the heartfelt principles of one's own nation? Perhaps we have us sum internal nations unto themselves. Yes ones that should very much like to expand big plan's, yes? Under legal definition, I a shall assume, psychological warfare must include some grievous transgression in malice of intent. Would not that be inciting Bill? Yes a malice of intent sling shot breath mint ahhhhhhh that is better sum. The divisive kind love their power grabbing inciting times yup. Perfecting such hateful divisive methods to a T brings the ethic into question do it knot?
Report spam or abuse
One properly pop's a super chicken boner with the pinky finger as the proper way of disagreeing with the scientific terrific community at brain large and in charge Yes in absolute toot yer flute unquestion duh bull charge. As this here unversity stamped clapping seal of approve all paper states in overly simplified exter ignorant Englishmen
Report spam or abuse
This is life under my hopeful definition You breath in your share of the positive along with the negative If you are lucky you breath out a little less negative and you become and individual on the + positive hopeful side of the living line. This requires some level of hopeful spiritualism in my estimation. I shall not be so arrogant as to individually decide for other's as to what hopeful positive spiritualism might best suffice. There is presented a tricky slicky sneaky creepy negative positive side of life yes positively hateful it is. I would simply label it deceit, along with all it's other arrogant labels Yes deceit to the dead drum beat "U are not meaningfully alive"
Report spam or abuse
Fake quotes from extant frodo 2
Report spam or abuse
Why would someone become an atheist... If someone came up to a mother and forced her son to be used in an experiment where he only has a 1% chance of surviving the mother would STILL believe in the 1% chance of surviving Atheists believe that God is not real because they don't want to accept the extremely high chances of them going to hell for their preexisting sins and hatred against God
Report spam or abuse
+The Garloc Gibberber "Why would someone become an atheist?" I'd sooner ask, "Why would someone become a theist?" There's no evidence any god exists. If I put a gun to your head (or credibly threatened the entire planet with extinction) could you possibly stop believing in god? Now just see it from our perspective. In an identical situation we could not possibly just believe to comply with the desire to fulfill that demand. In short buddy, it's not that we don't want to believe in god. That is not even a question for us. It's that we can't. Has any of this gotten through to you or am I talking to a wall?
Report spam or abuse
+The Garloc Gibberber    No one is a murderer by your logic you idiot, neither can anyone commit suicide, you believe everyone is immortal.
Report spam or abuse
To teach impressionable children that if they don't believe that Jesus Christ is the son of God and accept him into their heart, that they will go to hell to be punished for all eternity, that is child abuse, that permanently fucks up a childs mind...
Report spam or abuse
+thomas jewell HOW does it amount to "child abuse" to teach children that IMMORALITY DOES NOT EVER LEAD TO ANYTHING GOOD? This accusation is all the more galling when notes that THE SAME PEOPLE making it are keen to INDOCTRINATE said children into the belief that FAGGOTRY is OK! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
Bill Nye, I would like to let you know that the amount of evidence for creationism FAR exceeds the amount of evidence for evolution. Please don't deny evidence that is in plain sight. Also, the reason people come to America is not because we are scientifically advanced, but because of freedom and opportunity. For a scientist, you should really check your facts.
Report spam or abuse
Science & creationism vs the angry atheists, it's like reality vs fairy tales and we all know who is winning
Report spam or abuse
+Intimidating Creationism is not a science and atheism is merely a disbelief in a god. Creationism is as much a science as astrology or palm reading.
Report spam or abuse
Show more Loading...
to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...