Upload

Bill Nye: Creationism Is Not Appropriate For Children

by Big Think • 6,950,494 views

Don't miss new Big Think videos! Subscribe by clicking here: http://goo.gl/CPTsV5 Evolution is the fundamental idea in all of life science, in all of biology. According to Bill Nye, aka "the...

Maybe all the animals on the Ark had their asses hooked up to ass-sucking-machines that were powered by horses on treadmills. Donkeys on treadmills powered the fans that conducted the stench out the one window. For the necessary refrigeration system they powered that with elephants on treadmills. Then there were the feeding tubes with an abundance of species-specific Ensure™ and SOMA to keep everyone content and non-violent. I'm sure they could make it through a year of greater than 300 degree weather. Don't you?
Report spam or abuse
+matchlockfun   I think Mr Frodo should contact that goofball from Secret Aliens, you know that tanned numbskull that looks like he put two fingers into a power socket.  It sounds like a theory.
Report spam or abuse
+Gary Belliferous Yes sounds reasonable.
Report spam or abuse
Creationists, including ID creationists, pathologically misrepresent the facts, laws, logic, theories, history, philosophy, methods and BASIC TERMINOLOGY of science because they are science illiterates whose religious convictions make them fearful of scientific inquiry. Example: They HABITUALLY misrepresent the scientific terms theory, law, transitional, evolution, vestigial, &c. Science illiterates should not define science policy or science curricula or misinform children about basic science.
Report spam or abuse
+Fallible Fiend "This could go on forever. You have been confusing the issue with him - and thereby promoting ignorance, because you are a cowardly, fat mouth, lying ignoramus, Zaki." Ugh! BORING!
Report spam or abuse
+Fallible Fiend "Okay, I pick the Zaki persona.  You've gibbered about thermodynamics, information theory, and chaos theory.  Every sentence you've sputtered on the subject is science illiterate gibber. Every single one.  but that's to be expected because you are cowardly, fat mouth, lying ignoramus." All you EVER do is MAKE ASSERTIONS - BUT NEVER ONCE OFFER PROOF OF THE VALIDITY OF YOUR ASSERTIONS! And when that is brought to your notice, you cite the PERSONAL OPINIONS of what you call "actual scientists" some of whom believe that ROCKS HAVE NO MEANING - EVEN WHILST CLAIMING TO BE PROFESSORS OF GEOLOGY - and you think that is perfect proof! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
She's pining for her French man, it's a genetic poodle thing, someone should toss it something to chew on.
Report spam or abuse
+mikecucuk He's claiming I use the word "we", implying I have support, rather than the word "I" which has been found by Texan researchers to be an admission of feelings of inferiority. Background - Most of the past 5 years I spent posting from a university PC, with a ready audience. It would be dishonest of me to claim I was doing all the thinking when I had so much willing help. Of course, giggles has got Clarko's insult completely backwards - now she's caught between using "I" and admitting defeat, and using "we" and admitting she's a fake.
Report spam or abuse
Gigglebritches and her army of selves is very quiet lately. Shouldn't she be copy pasting furiously? Maybe she's out watching trees grow, using red herrings to aid her poor eyes?
Report spam or abuse
+Kickboxrr So you subscribe to Raelianism?
Report spam or abuse
+Kickboxrr You're not surprised that I sound arrogant because I'm an atheist? And you're going to tell me what all atheists think? You're kind of arrogant yourself, doncha think? Tell me, do you feel more hatred toward atheists or people of the other (ie"wrong") religions?
Report spam or abuse
The fundamental difference between creationism and evolution is that creationism requires abject intellectual incompetence and pathological lying. Creationists are the ones who: Pathologically lie about what scientists have said, what other users have said, and about science. Impersonate other users. Have multiple sock accounts. Harass other users. Pathologically misrepresent what science is and how it works. Disable replies to their idiotic nonsense. Exaggerate and lie about their degrees and accomplishments. Habitually pretend to expertise they do not have. Quote mine - and then fail to even recognize that quote mining epitomizes intellectually dishonesty!   When you're trying to understand the fake arguments here, note that evolution and creationism are not just "two different, but equal views." It's simple: The creationists are liars.
Report spam or abuse
Oh please Allah don't tell me she has discovered William Lame Craig and will quote his entire fictional works sentence by sentence like she does with the unknown Christian Meyer. Consider this little gem:   "This transcendent cause must therefore be changeless and immaterial, since timelessness entails changelessness, and changelessness implies immateriality."Add a couple of hundred "haha's", some Fundy CAPS and I think we found Waki's father.
Report spam or abuse
+mikecucuk   Like all religion it is unintelligible, just like its victims. 
Report spam or abuse
The video link below clearly shows why Creationism is not appropriate for children: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=9a3_1440199485
Report spam or abuse
The fundies (all four of them, pretending to be ninety-four of them) are out tonight. Obviously there's been some fundamentalist horror story in the news they want to distract us from. Is it the destruction of ancient temples in Palmyra? Or something more directly anti-human and pro-death?
Report spam or abuse
+10 Ton Steamroller  Reeeeeeeally know what, giggles?
Report spam or abuse
Of all the creationist red herrings, the one that sets me off the worst is "How could that animal live long enough for the right mutation to occur?". The problem is that to impart the level of understanding of the process of evolution for them to understand how wrong their question is would take weeks if not more. They say there are no dumb questions, but I think this particular one qualifies.
Report spam or abuse
+The CeIestial Coffeepot It's not my job to validate your invalid assumptions about evolution. Sorry, but you're sitting at the bottom of a dry apologetics well that your threw yourself into. Not my problem. ^_^
Report spam or abuse
Robert Sparks is an idiot.
Report spam or abuse
ClusterFuckRecords "Robert Sparks is an idiot." Well, I can understand the reason for your "BUTT HURT"; He subjected you to a BRUTAL MIND-FUCK, didn't he? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
+210raab 210raab "his brother Nicolas isn't." Nicky the Thicky is a COMPLETE BONEHEAD! He claims he's a PROFESSOR OF GEOLOGY yet goes around saying that ROCKS HAVE NO MEANING! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
If someone denies the fossil record then that person should have an alternative explanation as to what fossils are and what their ages are. Once again, nothing forthcoming except negative attacks on observable, repeatable and testable science.  No traction observable for ancient Hebrew creationists, just back sliding.
Report spam or abuse
Atheism is true??? Neil tyson disagrees with the baseless claim that "God is not real" which is only said by fools, the difference between the flying spagshit monster, fairies, monsters and santa is that belief in God was and now is and always was a scientific conclusion
Report spam or abuse
Atheist: Are you a theist? Creationist: Yes, I have a PhD in creationology.. it's the central pseudoscience of Biblostupidchronophilology.
Report spam or abuse
+Zaki Aminu you speak too much sonny boy.
Report spam or abuse
+mapondo1600 "you speak too much sonny boy." You don't mind, do you? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
Giggles is having trouble sleeping again.
Report spam or abuse
+Cerebral Independence  No I don't like circuse giggles. Animal cruelty. What did they do to you? And how did you escape?
Report spam or abuse
Rejection of evolution happens all around the world, it's not unique to the united states but the united states have more people rejecting it then in other countries due to the intellectual capital It's unprofessional to try to observe the universe you don't believe in that you think was an accident that had almost no chance whatsoever of happening, it's also unprofessional to think that one day fish somehow magically got legs and started walking, it's fiction from darwin's fairy tales
Report spam or abuse
+Peter van der Meer Which one? The fiction or the truth? Stop trying to push your fairy tales and other fiction that darwin and biased scientists who are illiterates dreamed about
Report spam or abuse
What really holds everybody back: people being stupid enough to believe that humans came from banana licking dinosaurs and that everything came from nothing
Report spam or abuse
+Tylerosaurus PRECISELY! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! MORALITY is the ONLY THING that holds back LICENTIOUS behaviour, which atheists are COMMITTED TO! And MORALITY IS ROOTED IN THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE WILL OF GOD! This is why atheists are DESPERATE to smother - if at all possible! As PARASITES, they rely on the dangers they pose not being recognized by their intended victims until it is too late! For that, they require the darkness of IGNORANCE OF THE WILL OF GOD, and therefore IGNORANCE of GOD HIMSELF, to fall upon their target!
Report spam or abuse
I am roman catholic and I happen to agree with this 100%! YEC protestants deny the scientific evidence supporting evolution and they are ironically breaking one of the ten commandments and that commandment states that no one should bear false witness upon one's neighbor.
Report spam or abuse
+Blue Neptune "Yes, let's hope they can make the next leap lol." Hahahahahahahahahaha! WHAT IF THEY DON'T? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
"if you are an atheist you make a claim that God is not real," Wrong an atheist does not know if god exists or not "if you don't believe in God then you are an atheist which means that you think there is no God, It means I don't know if there is a god or not "to say that there is no God is a claim" A god that does not manifest in the real world is indistinguishable from a god that does not exist. If you say god exists the burden of proof is yours. I don't know if god exists or not so Im not claiming anything. C'mon socko, grow a backbone and try to justify your faith.
Report spam or abuse
+Zaki Aminu Intelligibility is being able to be understood, to have the ability to be understood. No intelligence is required to be understood, understanding is an act performed by the observer, being understood is the state of the thing being observed.  You have no evidence that the Universe was "brought" into existence or that it is being "maintained". Fail You can't disprove Zeno by substituting another premise, you have to show the fault in the premise he uses "In order to catch the tortoise Achilles must first move to the place where the tortoise is at the start of the race" You can't fault the premise, the logic is valid and the conclusion follows the argument. So you have a valid Logic Statement that is wrong. Therefore Logic is not "perfect" and is not, by itself, proof of a Prime Cause.
Report spam or abuse
+werriboy55 "Intelligibility is being able to be understood, to have the ability to be understood. No intelligence is required to be understood, understanding is an act performed by the observer, being understood is the state of the thing being observed...." Hahahahahahahahahahaha! Stop it, Dag! You'll make me wee myself with laughter! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "....You have no evidence that the Universe was "brought" into existence or that it is being "maintained". Fail..." Hahahahahahahahahahahaha! BUT I DO, Dag! All I have to do is point out that THE UNIVERSE IS NOT ETERNAL! At least, NOT ALL PARTS OF IT ARE! If it has an ETERNAL PART, then that PART is responsible for PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING ALL THE REST - UNLESS YOU THINK THAT SOMETHING CAN COME OUT OF NOTHINGNESS! AT WHICH POINT I SHALL STAND BACK AND ALLOW YOU TO PROCEED INTO THE TWILIGHT ZONE! Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "....You can't disprove Zeno by substituting another premise, you have to show the fault in the premise he uses "In order to catch the tortoise Achilles must first move to the place where the tortoise is at the start of the race"...." I do not disagree with that STATEMENT! What I disagree with is the ARGUMENT THAT Achilles will NEVER catch the tortoise! That is sheer NONSENSE! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "....You can't fault the premise, the logic is valid and the conclusion follows the argument...." Hahahahahahahahahaha! You, CLEARLY, are just TRAUMATIZED by the FACT that your favourite disguise has been EXPOSED by ME, eh Dag? Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! You don't know what to do now but keep trying to put the mask back on - even though I've SPLINTERED IT INTO BITS! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "...So you have a valid Logic Statement that is wrong. Therefore Logic is not "perfect" and is not, by itself, proof of a Prime Cause." Hahahahahahahahahaha! I can see I'm dealing with a mind-control victim and all I'm going to get from you henceforth is a BLUE SCREEN RESPONSE! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Let me just point out that you're arguing here WITH LOGIC to try and show that LOGIC is UNRELIABLE - WHERE DOES THAT LEAVE YOUR ARGUMENT, Dag? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
Your computer is designed, your TV is designed, your shirt is designed, your glasses (which i know you atheists ware because you're unhealthy) are designed, science experiments are made my intelligent beings How your body isn't and it magically came into being from non-life? How does that even work? It doesn't even make sense, atheists are just willing to take the irrational risk to go to hell and delude them selves that their belief is rational but it's really an emotionally based belief that any non-biased and non-awful scientist would reject and mark as a result of emotions and not rational thinking Sorry, science is facts and evidence, not based on emotions
Report spam or abuse
Why must one believe in evolution to become an engineer?!
Report spam or abuse
"There is no rational, moral, immoral, pleasure seeking or shreya [sic] reason to be an atheist, there is no evidence for atheism, and yes atheism is just as much of a believe [sic] of faith as creationism is, just like believing in evolution (the part of it that disagrees with creationism) takes just as much faith as believing in creation if not more [sic]" It is hard to imagine how anyone could include quite so much nonsense in three lines, even if that were the intent. Atheism doesn't need a reason. It's the default state: not to accept or believe in propositions in the absence of evidence. It is the default that even people of faith adopt, with respect to nearly every god that was ever imagined. Atheism likewise requires no evidence. It's the most rational stance when no evidence exists. However, among the reasons many scientists are atheist, they are aware more than most that much of what people of faith believe isn't true: it's contradicted by empirical evidence. Evolution, properly understood, leads to that conclusion. Atheism isn't a belief. To be an atheist is to reject belief, just like not collecting stamps isn't a hobby. There is no belief in evolution. The theory of evolution depends on evidence, overwhelming evidence across several scientific disciplines. Creationism, in contrast, depends entirely on belief. It is supported by no evidence, and is contradicted by entire fields of scientific inquiry (Earth science, for example).
Report spam or abuse
Report spam or abuse
Jesus is NOT: an imaginary friend Jesus ACTUALLY is: one of the most influential people to walk on earth
Report spam or abuse
+Gary Belliferous You are muslim, that is all i know =) (i am christian)
Report spam or abuse
How stupid are atheists... let's find out... They are as stupid as someone who thinks that disbelieving that 1 + 1 = 2 is not the same as making a claim, if you are an atheist you make a claim that God is not real, if you don't believe in God then you are an atheist which means that you think there is no God, to say that there is no God is a claim, do you have any evidence? The burden of proof is on both sides, only the delusional don't accept that
Report spam or abuse
Many atheists think that God creating hell is immoral, it's like giving someone a small reason to suicide, YOU made your self go to hell by being dumb enough to be an atheist, that's not a problem with the world, that's a problem with you, and we need to get very clear on that, if a loved one was an atheist and now he is in hell it's entirely his fault that he was an atheist, nobody forced him to so...
Report spam or abuse
Look evolution is fake point blank period. It was proven wrong. Creatism is REAL. God is REAL. Jesus Christ is REAL. Heaven and Hell IS REAL. Turn your life over to Jesus NOW before its too late because Jesus is coming back soon amd taking his chruch with him.
Report spam or abuse
10 Ton Steamroller continues to cling stubbornly to the ridiculous notion that incredibly low odds = not plausible is a legitimate argument against evolution. Better tell the state lottery commission that. They must not be getting any winners lately. LMAO XD
Report spam or abuse
The fundamental difference between creationism and evolution is that creationism requires abject intellectual incompetence and pathological lying. Creationists are the ones who: Pathologically lie about what scientists have said, what other users have said, and about science. Impersonate other users. Have multiple sock accounts. Harass other users. Pathologically misrepresent what science is and how it works. Disable replies to their idiotic nonsense. Exaggerate and lie about their degrees and accomplishments. Habitually pretend to expertise they do not have. Quote mine - and then fail to even recognize that quote mining epitomizes intellectually dishonesty! When you're trying to understand the fake arguments here, note that evolution and creationism are not just "two different, but equal views." It's simple: The creationists are liars.
Report spam or abuse
Science doesn't care about what you believe and doesn't cover fairy tales about fish having legs or everything coming from nothing
Report spam or abuse
+Zaki Aminu Exactly, this guy is just a self deceptional atheist illiterate
Report spam or abuse
Being an atheist won't make up for you not being good at life, it will do the opposite, you're not a critical smart thinker just because you made up a result before doing the process of getting it
Report spam or abuse
+Intimidating That doesn't even make sense! Then I suggest you improve your reading comprehension. :P
Report spam or abuse
Atheists have no arguments against creationism
Report spam or abuse
I am a cunty delusional atheist with the name of mike in real life, but since i think it's awful i renamed my self to mikecucunt, i am a sock account of fallible fiend and a moron
Report spam or abuse
Report spam or abuse
How to be an evolutionist. First you must believe that evolution is fact. If you don't believe that evolution is scientific fact then you will never see it. Why? Because the mountain of evidence that shows miniscule genetic changes in organisms doesn't show LARGE Darwinian changes so we have to fill in the difference with imagination. Imagining small changes equals large changes is evolution and if you don't believe in evolution you won't see it. Creationists know that science isn't the imagination but evolutionists don't know that. In their mind it all makes sense and it may but it is not real. The theory of evolution proposed in the 19th century was presented before any observation of it was seen. For 150 years we have been trying to get life to evolve as Darwin suggested but life doesn't want to cooperate with Darwin. So if you want to see evolution you have to imagine it happening in the future and imagine that what we see when we look at fossils was evolution in our past. Evolution lives in anytime but the present and if you don't believe in it then you can't imagine it and you won't see it. If evolution is impossible then ALL interpretations of fossils and small changes will be forced to change. Evolution as it's imagined contradicts the Genesis account and I assert it's the only reason why we are being asked to imagine it.
Report spam or abuse
+Robert Sparks you're an idiot.
Report spam or abuse
@the retard with the reply function off I could eat a bowl of alphabet soup and shit out a smarter statement than that  :/
Report spam or abuse
It's not professional to try to observe the universe without believing the big bang happened
Report spam or abuse
@Owned fatkins that is your self deception
Report spam or abuse
Bill is right, Creationism is horrible for the future of this world. Humans came from single/multi-cell organisms, to tiny sea life, to ancient fish-like creatures, to apes, to humans. Feel free to hate PLEASE!
Report spam or abuse
+HooDini Hahahahahahahahahahaha! WHY do you think that SOMETHING CAN COME OUT OF MEANINGLESSNESS? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
Report spam or abuse
Zaki Aminu: To indoctrinate a small impressionable child into a religion which uses fear of eternal damnation as a vise is highly unethical, and that child will likely spend his or her life struggling with the question of will they go to hell should they decide to shelf christian theology in favor of the pursuit of their own intellectual potential...I say that's a form of child abuse. You can teach morality and ethics to a child without having to resort to fear tactics...
Report spam or abuse
+thomas jewell "To indoctrinate a small impressionable child into a religion which uses fear of eternal damnation as a vise is highly unethical...." WHY? Don't you think that children should be shown the right way in life? Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "...and that child will likely spend his or her life struggling with the question of will they go to hell should they decide to shelf christian theology in favor of the pursuit of their own intellectual potential.." Hahahahahahahahahahahaha! HOW does BEING MORAL prevent one from pursuing the development of one's intellectual potential? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "....I say that's a form of child abuse...." WHO CARES WHAT YOU SAY! It's for parents to bring up their children - in a way that is in accordance with the law of the land! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "...You can teach morality and ethics to a child without having to resort to fear tactics..." Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Without PAINFUL CONSEQUENCES, there is NO REASON for ANYONE to avoid doing wrong things! Conversely, without PLEASANT CONSEQUENCES, there is NO REASON to continue persevering with correct actions! One learns ONLY through getting FEEDBACK from one's actions! Didn't you know that? And this applies equally to humans as to animals and machines! As one sows, so one reaps! Fair's fair! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
The facts. What the scientists are actually saying. No need to make it up. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11876/science-evolution-and-creationism
Report spam or abuse
+Grand Tournament Sock Account As one who is oblivious and hostile to facts and logic, your opinion on the subject is irrelevant.
Report spam or abuse
Bill nye said in other big think videos "If humans were designed then why don't they have more than just hands arms etc. and why aren't they stronger, smarter etc." If humans had, for example: claws, they would be used to harm others, that wouldn't help anyone! Bill nye is using 500 year old arguments that got disproven many times, one of them is also "who created God, he didn't come out of nothing" when it's very clear that God is eternal, everyone knows this Even darwin's parents and even his own flying carpet disagrees with his atheist claims
Report spam or abuse
Yawn, so many messages/copy from an ID website, and not a single things which actually makes the scientific theory of evolution false. Is that all the chew toy have? Baseless assertions?
Report spam or abuse
Creationists literally own this forum, we are rational and critical thinkers who aren't scared easily by baseless claims of atheists who have no evidence whatsoever so they try to confuse others into believing their belief and claim
Report spam or abuse
Report spam or abuse
Report spam or abuse
+Intimidating  Actually it is but still it is woo woo that's who you. 
Report spam or abuse
Damp Dung Sprayer recently sprayed: Poor evolutionists [sic], your theory hinges on the probabilities of random, chance nucleotide copying errors having somehow designed the millions of novel proteins which explain all of life's diversity. The burden of proof is squarely on your narrow little shoulders to demonstrate that this whole idea is even plausible from a probability point of view. Her impoverished brain then proceeds to come to the conclusion that the source of diversity of life is her even less PLAUSIBLE sky wizard (which she still doesn't have the courage to name - she has the balls only to hint at its existence). This is known as the fallacy of personal incredulity combined with god designer of the gaps, i.e. "I find the natural explanation too astonishing to believe, and in the absence of anything else that makes sense to me, I postulate a sky wizard designer who is a very tricky fellow because he's very good at playing hide-and-seek." One has to wonder if she is using the apparent look of design of organisms to prove her Gawd designer exists in the absence of any other evidence, or if she is using her imperceptible, intangible Gawd designer to prove organisms were designed.
Report spam or abuse
I simply CAN'T SEE what it is one is missing out by simply IGNORING Darwinism COMPLETELY! I mean, there are NO PRACTICAL BENEFITS WHATSOEVER that result from knowing what it claims - and, to date, NO USEFUL APPLICATIONS OF IT HAVE EVER BEEN FOUND! SO - EVEN IF IT IS CORRECT - WHAT GOOD IS IT? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! I MUCH PREFER carrying on as I am! If I die in my present state, I WOULD HAVE MISSED OUT ON NOTHING if it turns out my expectations of what come after this life are wrong! If they're right though then I would have lived my life in a way that puts me in an advantageous position in the Afterlife! If it turns out atheists are wrong, they face an ETERNITY IN HELL! And, if they're right, THEY'RE NO BETTER OFF THAN ME! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
+werriboy55 "Being unable to demonstrate your existence mat be upsetting to you, I don't worry about it..." Hahahahahahahahaha! Well, I suppose if you have NOTHING in your bank account, you don't worry about people gaining unauthorized access to it either, do you? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "...You think Logic is perfect which means you don't understand Logic...." Hahahahahahahahahahaha! You have CORRUPTED your connection with LOGIC - and have substituted a CARICATURE of it in the place it should occupy in your mind, Dag! That's all! I mean, HOW can you even claim to have UNDERSTANDING of ANYTHING if you're actually saying that LOGIC is NOT PERFECT? If 2+2=4 is not regarded by one to be a PERFECTLY CORRECT STATEMENT, but can be something else sometimes, HOW IS IT POSSIBLE FOR ONE TO CLAIM ONE UNDERSTANDS ARITHMETIC? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! ".....As for Truth being perfect, who knows. Facts are real, truth is in the eye of the beholder." Hahahahahahahahahaha! Again you have substituted a CARICATURE of TRUTH into the place it should occupy in your mind - and so you're not PLAGUED BY DOUBTS! So much so that you do not even realize that TRUTH, FACT, and REALITY are ONE AND THE SAME THING! NATURALLY, AT THE SAME TIME, YOU DO NOT KNOW WHETHER OR NOT YOU EVEN EXIST! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
Geez, you are like a virus infesting Youtube, Dragon Slayer a.k.a. many other sock account names.
Report spam or abuse
+MrMezmerized "Geez, you are like a virus infesting Youtube, Dragon Slayer a.k.a. many other sock account names." You don't mind, do you? Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
its just as stupid to think that something comes from nothing or that nothing never existed. but I still rather believe that a god created the universe and life simply because if not, whats the purpose of being human? It makes more sense to me to think that we are actually here on purpose, rather than just being the cause of a spontaneous chain of chaotic events. im not a creationist by the way. i just believe in God.
Report spam or abuse
+cesar fresnillo   Mmmm, no actually, there is plenty of evidence that the Big Bang happened and that it's still banging, no one within physics or the sane world disputes this, the insane world claims to know the origins of the universe and that it was a supernatural event without a single atom of evidence. There is mathematical evidence that universal inflation is a natural event, called the de Broglie/Bohm Quantum Trajectory Theory, no gods needed, look it up.  So I have mathematical evidence, the entire fields of 21st century theoretical and particle physics and you have a 4th century book filled with demons, ghosts, spirits, giants, lion men, satyrs, cockatrices, human faced locusts and talking animals.  Not much of a selection for an honest man, IMO. 
Report spam or abuse
How to NOT go to hell, i am only helping and not being against atheism, all i am doing is knowing how delusional and dishonest you have to be in order to be an atheist: Step 1: Stop being an atheist by seeing just how delusional it is Step 2: Do not disagree with creationist comments or reply to them hahaha Step 3: When you start suffering then you will turn to Jesus Step 4: If you cannot do this then how about you take a piece of oat then shove it up your brain then punch your self in the head
Report spam or abuse
+rogerden roger What 9th? The dishonest God-hater seems to have some kind of mental illness... we must have touched a nerve so you wanted to project with your bad insults!
Report spam or abuse
+The Garloc Gibberber obviously saw my comment and responded. Now the comment no longer exists. One of you is lying and off to an imaginary hell for it.
Report spam or abuse
"theory of evolution is utterly useless and unable to serve up an explanation for how and why human consciousness emerged" Can you spell Strawman Fallacy. LMFAO
Report spam or abuse
This is dogmatic in its own way and blind to other parts of reality that science doesn't so easily observe like the mind, the heart, and the soul. The material world exists and science can prove and solve things in the material world but to think of concrete science as the only thing there is is to be creating a new dogma or religion of your own . There are limitations to science and being in denial of that and turning it into a religion is why we have such problems in the MD and science community today . For instance, people are over medicated with psychiatric drugs even in cases of mild or moderate depression when the core of psychiatric problems is actually psychological problems and for that you need a good therapist you can trust and an understanding of psychology and the mind . Concrete religious zealots like bill nye would more likely push the myth that the psychiatric problems are the core of the problem and the solution is to just Medicate everyone. That's the easiest way to make the symptoms go away immediately and make the patient not a problem as soon as possible but in many cases its counter productive to the long term goals of a depressed person to understand and control their own mind and get in touch with their heart and soul which all do exist in each human but people like bill nye live in their own psychologically disconnected world where they believe that only the solid material world exists. That dysfunction is caused by a fear deep down to admit that we are much more powerless than we think and our limitations are defined to a point and we are all most likely not alone in the universe and almost certainly not the most powerful elements of existence.
Report spam or abuse
+Nicholas Christie-Blick   So true, we'll let the record speak for itself, we can just sit back smirking enjoying a hot cup of tea. 
Report spam or abuse
Who cares what the top US scientists think? According to the National Academy of Science press: "Creationism, intelligent design, and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science. These claims subordinate observed data to statements based on authority, revelation, or religious belief."
Report spam or abuse
+matchlockfun I'm here to show the delusion atheists are under. Nothing more.
Report spam or abuse
+Robert Sparks And yet you're untrained in the life sciences, and not knowledgeable about what atheism entails. Thus you are merely a youtube evangelist, aka a troll, or predator. To become something more relevant, or more worthwhile, offer testable evidence for not just the existence of an all-powerful creaor, but its identity as a jealous anthropomorphic admirer of Israel.
Report spam or abuse
Evolution has never left the 19th century. To date it remains the only supposed physical phenomenon that has never been seen or tested. Without experiment there is no way to know if a theory is possible. For 150 years evolution has failed to show itself in the lab and I suspect it isn't a real phenomenon. What else can I think? Every other asserted physical phenomenon for the last 500+ years has made it's way into the 21st century except evolution. It's the lone holdout that stubbornly will not show itself. There is a mountain of physical evidence for small change in organisms but nothing to suggest large changes can happen over time and that an organism can survive these changes. I don't think they can and amazingly there is no evidence that contradicts that statement.
Report spam or abuse
how sad :( I grew up watching his videos, but not knowing he a was an atheist... Ill pray for you Bill... I used to be loat juat like you, but Jesus saved me and that's no lie... When people would tell me are you saved? have you accepted god? I would say no or not yet, I didn't think it would be real, untill one day I did and my whole life changed... Ill pray for you Bill and all the people that follow you...
Report spam or abuse
+McRotty "hmm. fuck you" Forget it, FAGGOT! I'm NOT into SHIT HOLE FUCKING! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
Report spam or abuse
+sara carlson Yeah, he's a PREACHER OF ATHEISM! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
@Ergono-moron learn to spell before trying to argue with someone who is clearly owning you, also learn the sons name first, it's billy from bill, but you can't fire your neurons because of your lack of brain cells, i better remove half of my brain cells then comment so that i can agree with you... oh wait, there is no point in living in your illusion of a world view!
Report spam or abuse
+Anti-Atheist Potato Sock Account Leave the mental retard alone, easy win for you against the econo-boober
Report spam or abuse
+Anti-Atheist Potato Sock Account Bill Nye's only child is a daughter named Charity, born in 2003.Again, what planet are you on?
Report spam or abuse
PUBLIC NOTICE Unlike some resident sock puppeteers and grief-spreading trolls here (you know who you are), people in this forum actually have a life beyond their computers and need to attend to the responsibilities that come with life. It has nothing to do with people going missing, being exiled (HA!), or having passed on. QED, Dozy Bill Nye. ;)
Report spam or abuse
+Gary Belliferous All finished. I started off with three. I'll wait to see if it catches on.
Report spam or abuse
+mikecucuk   I've just crawled out of bed and I'm off to work.  Go to Google+ click on communities, type into search bar 'Atheism Humour & Memes', click join community and post your memes. Better still I'll send you an invitation. 
Report spam or abuse
wow still with the sock accounts gibbering to themselves while others disallow replies desperation fills the air
Report spam or abuse
+Zaki Aminu re peat your self like a robot lol are you saying atheist make you guys crazy
Report spam or abuse
+falseflagattack1 "re peat your self like a robot lol are you saying atheist make you guys crazy" I'm saying that atheists are not keen on FACTS and LOGIC - as your comments demonstrate! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
Ofc atheism won't exist in a couple sentries, there is no evidence for the unhealthy world view of the blind WHY would you be an atheist? Just WHY?
Report spam or abuse
+Rumble Sock Account The world becomes insanely complicated when you don't believe in creation, here we are having complicated working bodies that were just some kind of magical accident?
Report spam or abuse
Most children in the USA get bad grades and are poorly educated, being atheists would make it worse beyond belief
Report spam or abuse
If you were an Apostle (John), and exiled to an island by a Roman Emperor, you would certainly find it more interesting to imagine and write about your dreams, rather than smash rocks together all day, and think about your exile.
Report spam or abuse
Report spam or abuse
+McRotty "The Borg are too" Glad to hear that also! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
"Many human genomic regions previously assumed to be nonfunctional have recently been found to be teeming with biochemical activity ". (Encode, Kellis et al, 2014)  "It’s clear that 80% of the genome has a specific biochemical activity – whatever that might be." (Encode leader Ewan Birney, on his blog 2013) "For me, the big important thing of ENCODE is that we found that a lot of the genome had some kind of biochemical activity . And we do describe that as “biochemical function”, but that word “function” in the phrase “biochemical function”is the thing which gets confusing. If we use the phrase “biochemical activity”, that’s precisely what we did, we find that the different parts of the genome, [??] 80% have some specific biochemical event we can attach to it ." (Ewan Birney, BBC interview, 2013) "The 80% claim, he (Encode's Kellis) says, was misunderstood and misreported. Roughly that proportion of the genome might be biochemically active , he explains, but some of that activity is undoubtedly meaningless , leaving unanswered the question of how much of it is really 'functional'." (Nature, may 2014) We are clearly not talking about 80% biological function of human genes. There's no such thing.
Report spam or abuse
+Gary Belliferous Aparently they got a Bible without Genesis.
Report spam or abuse
+Robert Sparks   They have bibles but they've half a functioning brain as well. 
Report spam or abuse
Intelligent Design proponent +Chocolate Coated Reason states the following: "if there is not a gradual route to their production" as a requirement when design is evident. Fair enough in itself but how do we know if there is no 'gradual route'. This is where the whole idea of 'irreducible complexity' falls flat on its face. Its an argument from ignorance; not knowing if there is a gradual route does not mean there is none.
Report spam or abuse
+Peritrichous Dominatur The default position of something that is not known is unknown, not implausible. 
Report spam or abuse
I will be happy enough with an explanation based on FACTS and LOGIC ALONE - EVEN IF THERE IS NO DOCUMENTATION OF SUCH AN EXPLANATION IN ANY SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL! But all atheists seem capable of doing is PARROTING the NONSENSE Dawkins and co. drop from their intellectual back passages; feasting on them as if they were delicacies! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
+Transtlan Tico "Alan... how can creationists accept the formation of NEW SPECIES by means of random mutations and natural selection? when your claims are for determinismo and supernatural intervention? LOL..." You're QUITE RIGHT! Creationists recognize that RANDOMNESS CAN NEVER BE DETERMINISTIC - and therefore can NEVER PRODUCE ANYTHING SINCE IT HAS NO GOAL! Also SELECTION is IMPOSSIBLE IN THE ABSENCE OF INTELLIGENT AGENCY! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
+Transtlan Tico "...all of those quotes are debunked at TALKORIGINS website...." Hahahahahahahahahahahaha! So you're just another one of their MINDLESS ZOMBIES, eh? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! If asked to say WHY you think what they're telling you is correct, YOU WON'T HAVE AN ANSWER TO OFFER FOR THAT - beyond, perhaps, claiming that they know it all and should NEVER be challenged or scrutinized, will you? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! ZOMBIE! Hahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
I disagree, religion won't affect or halt scientific innovation or progression in the future, I mean we have to look at the past so we can predict the future. From 1800s to Today We've advanced technology and sciences at a very rapid pace, and I see it only increasing even further in the future.
Report spam or abuse
+Peter van der Meer I mentioned that time period, even though it wasn't the "Age of Enlightenment" period, because in that little window of human history a lot of things changed majorly in scientific discovery and progression. I don't really care for the times before that, even though some huge revelations were indeed discovered before the mentioned time period. All I'm simply trying to say is that if we look at recent history science has not been "held back" by religion. We don't even need to get into technical shit to see that obviously we're only getting more and more advanced in the future, we're in the 21st century it's highly unlikely we'll be receding.
Report spam or abuse
There are no transitional links and intermediate forms in either the fossil record or the modern world. Therefore, there is no actual evidence that evolution has occurred in the past or present. Although evolutionists state that life resulted from non-life, matter resulted from nothing, and humans resulted from animals. Each of these is an impossibility of science and the natural world. Evolution is not repeatable, testable or observable. Its not real science. how can you tell an atheist is lying? Their mouths moving.
Report spam or abuse
Re: "Creationism Is Not Appropriate For Children" Jesus said:  "But at the beginning of creation God 'made them male and female.' - Mark 10:6 and Jesus said, "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these." - Matthew 19:14 Jesus never told a lie, we were created. Children should hear about the truth.
Report spam or abuse
@All-Hail-Disorderdick You are very bad with words and English just like you are bad at converting people
Report spam or abuse
+Renekton Sock Account He's a SECOND CLASS German! He has some Red Army genes in him acquired from the Russian sex party in Berlin and the rest of the Third Reich in 1945
Report spam or abuse
Weird how some try to claim intelligent design is a scientific theory... when it's not even considered an hypothesis in science. Kind of show how they are disconnected from reality in general.
Report spam or abuse
+Zaki Aminu Logical argument? Bwaaa ha ha ha! Good one Zaki! The entire record of the last three years shows you are incapable of making one! No blind faith in a scientific theory Zaki, but it's so fun to see you squirm at the realization that your god/designer idea is not even considered a possibility.
Report spam or abuse
Another creatard recently puked: Intelligent design is not any guarantee of compassionate design. finally admitting that this designer is a real prick at times, something we atheists have known for a long time. I wonder if she's coming around to atheism one step at a time...
Report spam or abuse
+Dozy Bill Nye Too vague. Be precise. Be empirical. Be rigorous. Be scientific. Put your hand over your heart and tell me that you apply this same advice to yourself with the same rigor that you're demanding of me. I am NOT your personal research assistant, twit! Of course you're not. You're your OWN personal research assistant. I'm not doing your reading for you, you lazy ass. Precisely. (evil grin) Did you not realize that I was criticizing your ridiculous notion of group NDEs (which you've failed to validate beyond mere assertion, btw)? Like you said, be precise. Be empirical. Be rigorous. Be scientific. Or do you have a fire extinguisher on stand-by in case your hypocrisy meter blows up in your face again?
Report spam or abuse
Did you know that charled darwin later said that his theory was wrong? He said no this can't be right. and its sad to know that all of the evolutions and athiests are going to hell when they die and they will be begging for mercy :( :(
Report spam or abuse
+Kawaii Kitten I don't see how talking to yourself is going to do me any good.
Report spam or abuse
Why would someone become an atheist... If someone came up to a mother and forced her son to be used in an experiment where he only has a 1% chance of surviving the mother would STILL believe in the 1% chance of surviving Atheists believe that God is not real because they don't want to accept the extremely high chances of them going to hell for their preexisting sins and hatred against God
Report spam or abuse
+ExtantFrodo2 Pop, now i have removed your comment again, you got rekt so hard
Report spam or abuse
+ExtantFrodo2 Kiss your comment good-bye 😰 😰 😰
Report spam or abuse
Little has changed in the creationist agenda since 1981, when biologist Stephen Jay Gould noted: "The entire creationist argument involves little more than a rhetorical attempt to falsify evolution by presenting supposed contradictions among its supporters " (Evolution as Fact and Theory).
Report spam or abuse
+Robert Sparks  Hurt didn't it, there is absolutely no difference in the belief of leprechauns, hobgoblins and gods, none of them can be confirmed or falsified because they're not part of reality.  Try to focus.
Report spam or abuse
+Robert Sparks Sparkplug.. ahem butthead, is this your "stupid life, divided into warped illogic hours"? Clearly name calling isn't above me :) What's the matter, your cross so unbearable, you can't keep walking? Mount of Olives not coming into your creationist Pilate salad? The scientific method has never been brought to bear on evolution? The scientific method is how evolution was first observed. Your statements don't make any sense, unless your idea of sense is hitting yourself in the head with a club. Seriously sparkiglet, you are, mid Sparkwipped Theist-Roberts. Your nickname was born out of your own cyber-creatardation. I wonder why you think your thought police God allows you to get away with anything you do every day. You know you fall short of the glory of God, but deep down, you know you really don't believe in him. Next.
Report spam or abuse
"believing in evolution (the part of it that disagrees with creationism)" You mean ALL of evolution! LMFAO
Report spam or abuse
+Zaki Aminu So there are two types of intelligent design; the mundane kind that we can observe and just adapts existing conditions and the unobservable kind that creates the conditions it uses. A "special" sort of ID in other words. How do you intend to show that this "special" ID exists?
Report spam or abuse
"Fossils may tell us many things, but one thing they can never disclose is whether they were ancestors of anything else."   -    Colin Patterson  (1933 – 1998)  Senior Palaeontologist at British Museum of Natural History,   Evolution  (1999) p.109 "One of the reasons I started taking this anti-evolutionary view, or let's call it a non- evolutionary view, was last year I had a sudden realization for over twenty years I had thought I was working on evolution in some way. One morning I woke up and something had happened in the night and it struck me that I had been working on this stuff for twenty years and there was not one thing I knew about it. That's quite a shock to learn that one can be so misled so long. Either there was something wrong with me or there was something wrong with evolutionary theory. Naturally, I know there is nothing wrong with me, so for the last few weeks I've tried putting a simple question to various people and groups of people. Question is: Can you tell me anything you know about evolution, any one thing, that is true? I tried that question on the geology staff at the Field Museum of Natural History and the only answer I got was silence. I tried it on the members of the Evolutionary Morphology Seminar in the University of Chicago, a very prestigious body of evolutionists, and all I got there was silence for a long time and eventually one person said, "I do know one thing - it ought not to be taught in high school.""   -     Colin Patterson  (1933 – 1998)  Senior Palaeontologist at British Museum of Natural History,  "Evolutionism and Creationism"  November 5, 1981  p.1    ********************************************************************************************** Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
+werriboy55 "You say Patterson was a paleontologist. Is that relevant to his knowing what he was talking about?" You'd think so, wouldn't you? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
Claim and belief:    Has evidence: You have a reason to believe it                                                                               Creationism                     X                              X Atheism                           No                              No Science                           X                              X Evolution                         X                              X We all know what the fucked idiocy is
Report spam or abuse
+Aaron Z "Well first, my points are derived from objective reasoning...." HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT? Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "...Second, you don't seem to have any points..." Hahahahahahahahahaha! HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! "...so how can you criticize mine?" Well, you're simply MAKING ASSERTIONS WITHOUT SUBSTANTIATING THEM, aren't you? Hahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
I'm not making any assertions, we've discussed this. My assertion is that you haven't provided any evidence for your assertion, which you haven't. All you've said is that since the universe exists, god had to have made it, but this isn't true. All the universe's existence means is that the universe had to have came about somehow. There is no evidence that that somehow was god. 
Report spam or abuse
There is no good argument that atheism is true, however there are many arguments that theism is true, both are claims, ideas and beliefs, atheists have tried to disprove theism and christianity for many years but always failed The reason everything exists is because of the big bang, but what was the cause of the big bang? Nothing can come from nothing, what atheists are saying is like saying that information can come from not knowing things The being that created the big bang must be transcendent, timeless and a personal mind, If the earth was just a little bit closer to the sun, we wouldn't exist, if the universe was just a little bit different at the beginning, it wouldn't exist, our bodies being practical and complicated like this can't be an accident, this is ALL fine-tunning There is no multiverse, no infinite universes can exist because infinity is just an idea If God does not exist then real moral values don't exist, an atheist cannot have any morals whatsoever, an action like rape is not socially good but it does nothing to prove that it's bad for the one raping, for an atheist there is nothing wrong or bad with rape unless it's being done to a loved one or the atheist Actions like rape and murder are moral abominations but for an atheist they are not actually immoral Also if God does not exist then how did jesus have a miracle? You can also know that God exists without arguments evidence or proof but from experience
Report spam or abuse
+lordlandraid You're a loser, no body likes you :) you have no friends
Report spam or abuse
There is so much evidence for the existance of God that atheists are willfully ignorant to because they know it proves them wrong and that atheism is not even acceptable by a normal person, in some countries atheism is considered a cult of idiots who are staying close minded forever
Report spam or abuse
+Snuffleupagus Atheism is cancer of the soul before it becomes cancer of the mind, why would a normal person reject belief in God? There is no actual reason, this is really important, it's the proof that atheists are or mentally ill or have poisoned souls that poison their minds after that and their world view then fits into the science of criticised evolution The part of evolution that disagrees with creationism is widely criticised in the USA, noone will accept it as a fact because everyone knows it's a claim with no evidence for it
Report spam or abuse
Dear America, We unreservedly apologize for giving you Ken Ham. He is an idiot. Can we still be friends? Sincerely, Australia.
Report spam or abuse
+McRotty "Seen Brian Moonan's website?.. it's warped beyond what Ken Ham does." Maybe it's the way you're looking at it! I mean, if YOUR vision is WARPED....! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
Cerebral Is-Defenseless farted out the following: 1) New top posts that push older ones down the page,  Which you do unabashedly with a deluge of copy-and-paste quotes from your army of sock puppet accounts in total violation of YouTube's guidelines. 2) Replies to posts Which you disable without batting an eyelid and without a twitch of hypocrisy in your eyes. Being an IDiot sure suppressed your feelings of guilt, remorse, and introspection. It's my understanding you can choose which list you prefer to use. ...(yawn) And I choose to enable replies, which I've yet to see you do even once. What's the matter? Did your balls drop off when you rage quit last year?
Report spam or abuse
+mikecucuk  Haha, a douche bag doesn't need a condom. 
Report spam or abuse
+Gary Belliferous At least a douche bag is clean. She's more of a douche nozzle.
Report spam or abuse
My dad bill sure messed up with this video, but i won't do the same, i won't be a liar who doesn't know science when i grow up like he is, I AM BILLY AND BILL IS A LIAR, BUT I WILL BE BETTER, I AM HIS SON, BILLY!
Report spam or abuse
+Billy the son of bill nye Hahahahahahahahahaha! Good lad! Given you're his son, maybe your dad is not as FAGGOTY as he looks after all! Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
+Billy the son of bill nye Billy the son of bill nye: Sock account. Blocked.
Report spam or abuse
Tetrapods From Poland Trample the Tiktaalik School of Evolution Tracks of footprints found in a quarry in Poland have turned the palaeontological world upside down.1 For years there has been a neat evolutionary story about how fish evolved four legs and came out of the ocean onto the land.  Probably the most famous fossil in this sea-to-land icon of evolution is Tiktaalik roseae, a fish with fins that was claimed to have had features intermediate between fish and tetrapods.
Report spam or abuse
What do atheists have in menu for us... Ergono-moron, the gorilla gibbering fool, the nicholas cristie-blocked and the apple guy who stalks others in the comments but is very sensitive
Report spam or abuse
+Chocolate Cupped Reason Atheists remind me HIT MEN who URINATE IN TERROR and start WHIMPERING when they get a TELLING OFF from an old lady! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
+Chocolate Cupped Reason Chocolate Cupped Reason: Sock account. Blocked.
Report spam or abuse
How do people still believe in this shit?  Creationism should have died out hundreds of years ago.
Report spam or abuse
The chew toy said  : "''Macro-evolution is observed in the fossil record.'' Incorrect. Morphological CHANGE is observed in the fossil record. Nothing more." Is she claiming that there are no morphological changes occuring as new species arise?
Report spam or abuse
+Extant Frodo2 "Yes, indeed, Zaki!  Bill Nye is a whiner." He's worse than a toddler who's lost his dummy! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
ENCODE Project Writes EULOGY For Junk DNA March 25, 2013 - When researchers first sequenced the human genome, they were astonished by how few traditional genes encoding proteins were scattered along those 3 billion DNA bases. Instead of the expected 100,000 or more genes, the initial analyses found about 35,000 and that number has since been whittled down to about 21,000. In between were megabases of “junk,” or so it seemed.
Report spam or abuse
This week, 30 research papers, including six in Nature and additional papers published by Science, sound the death knell for the idea that our DNA is mostly littered with useless bases.  A decadelong project, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE), has found that 80% of the human genome serves some purpose, biochemically speaking.
Report spam or abuse
“I don’t think anyone would have anticipated even close to the amount of sequence that ENCODE has uncovered that looks like it has functional importance,” says John A. Stamatoyannopoulos, an ENCODE researcher at the University of Washington, Seattle.
Report spam or abuse
Evolution certainly without doubt exists of course..... ...But does it explain our beginnings? We could be some experiment from another species? 100 years we could certainly create a life form on another planet, so it is not impossible others did.  Not that I say that is what happened but there are more options to explore...just sayin.
Report spam or abuse
Conducting psychological warfare upon the heartfelt principles of one's own nation? Perhaps we have us sum internal nations unto themselves. Yes ones that should very much like to expand big plan's, yes? Under legal definition, I a shall assume, psychological warfare must include some grievous transgression in malice of intent. Would not that be inciting Bill? Yes a malice of intent sling shot breath mint ahhhhhhh that is better sum. The divisive kind love their power grabbing inciting times yup. Perfecting such hateful divisive methods to a T brings the ethic into question do it knot?
Report spam or abuse
nye is right inview of the ignorant tripe below dinosaurs and bananas did not coexist this video isnt about atheism which makes no claims
Report spam or abuse
+falseflagattack1 "nye is right inview of the ignorant tripe below dinosaurs and bananas did not coexist...." Well, bully for you and him! WHY are you not satisfied with being right and still feel "HELD BACK" by these so-called "ignorant" people then? WHY NOT GO ON YOUR OWN WAY AND LEAVE THEM ALONE TO WALLOW IN THEIR "ignorance"? WHY do you feel you NEED them - and their children? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!_* "...this video isnt about atheism which makes no claims." Yeah, right! Tell that to the birds! Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
One properly pop's a super chicken boner with the pinky finger as the proper way of disagreeing with the scientific terrific community at brain large and in charge Yes in absolute toot yer flute unquestion duh bull charge. As this here unversity stamped clapping seal of approve all paper states in overly simplified exter ignorant Englishmen
Report spam or abuse
I wonder why I can't reply to the youtube use @Dozy Bill Nye +Dozy Bill Nye. Hmm... Looks like he can't take criticism.
Report spam or abuse
+Nobs 4 Lyf He wants to stay away from your delusions and lies, that is all, hahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
To teach impressionable children that if they don't believe that Jesus Christ is the son of God and accept him into their heart, that they will go to hell to be punished for all eternity, that is child abuse, that permanently fucks up a childs mind...
Report spam or abuse
+thomas jewell HOW does it amount to "child abuse" to teach children that IMMORALITY DOES NOT EVER LEAD TO ANYTHING GOOD? This accusation is all the more galling when notes that THE SAME PEOPLE making it are keen to INDOCTRINATE said children into the belief that FAGGOTRY is OK! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
Fake quotes from extant frodo 2
Report spam or abuse
This is life under my hopeful definition You breath in your share of the positive along with the negative If you are lucky you breath out a little less negative and you become and individual on the + positive hopeful side of the living line. This requires some level of hopeful spiritualism in my estimation. I shall not be so arrogant as to individually decide for other's as to what hopeful positive spiritualism might best suffice. There is presented a tricky slicky sneaky creepy negative positive side of life yes positively hateful it is. I would simply label it deceit, along with all it's other arrogant labels Yes deceit to the dead drum beat "U are not meaningfully alive"
Report spam or abuse
Bill Nye, I would like to let you know that the amount of evidence for creationism FAR exceeds the amount of evidence for evolution. Please don't deny evidence that is in plain sight. Also, the reason people come to America is not because we are scientifically advanced, but because of freedom and opportunity. For a scientist, you should really check your facts.
Report spam or abuse
OMG!I use to like all of Bills ideas
Report spam or abuse
If you are an atheist then how about you take a piece of an oat, eat it, the poop it out of your butt while squatting then eat it again, then your delusions will be more clear
Report spam or abuse
+NIGGER DICK BULLSHIT SOCK ACCOUNT That's what their illuminati masters do! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Report spam or abuse
The oldest known trace of the genus Homo, a jawbone found in Ethiopia pushes back our ancestry another 400,000 years, just 400,000 years short of Australopithecus afarensis.  The jawbone is known as LD 350-1. 1 dick long
Report spam or abuse
Science & creationism vs the angry atheists, it's like reality vs fairy tales and we all know who is winning
Report spam or abuse
+Intimidating Creationism is not a science and atheism is merely a disbelief in a god. Creationism is as much a science as astrology or palm reading.
Report spam or abuse
Show more Loading...
to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...