GB
Upload
You're viewing YouTube in English (US).
Switch to another language: | View all
You're viewing YouTube in English.
Switch to another language: | View all
PART 1 I think I didn't address your last comment enough so I will now: 1) , I don't think the pointless wars are as costly as you think, but hey Ron Paul would end them anyways so there's a point for him, no? 2) I don't agree that the crash was free market. To reply to your most recent comment: Corporate influence is drawn to large powerful and centralised governments. If we had the system in the constitution, the one Ron Paul wants, it would be much harder to corrupt the system.
Report spam or abuse
Then reserving judgement is warranted for rational peoples.
Report spam or abuse
He is old! Old enough to maybe know a thing about the government! He has only been thinking about it for around 50 years now!
Report spam or abuse
I used to be part of his cult of personality; it is embarrassing to look back and think " I wanted this guy to run the country."
Report spam or abuse
These methods have become obsolete because government grew and is now a very powerful tool for private companies to use to oppress the public, since they will use what they have. Without government, this would not be possible (in a free market).
Report spam or abuse
You act as though it is financially stable now. As for the plan, he wants to allow people to opt out of it.
Report spam or abuse
He wants to phase it out, not abruptly end it so young people lose all the money they put in. You could've known this by simply reading his wiki page, but I guess researching the person you criticise is too much a hassle.
Report spam or abuse
He wants to give people under 25 the option to opt out. His program cuts all unconstitutional military expenditure in order to put money back into social security for those who are dependent on it. In fact, he is the only one with a plan that can save social security.
Report spam or abuse
One can't magically know the original context of everything one looks at.
Report spam or abuse
PART 2 If we had the very state focused system one would have to target state governments for real power, not the 700 or so members of the federal government. But even the greatest state governments are only a fraction of the power the federal government holds now. If you like the centralised system, how exactly do you propose to keep it from being corrupted? Giving the federal government full control over the economy is just the alternative way of merging corporate power with government power.
Report spam or abuse
Report spam or abuse
Let me get this straight...so Dr. Paul collected SS, yet he expects everyone else to be without it? That's really selfish and hypocritical of him. I thought he's supposed to be the most consistent candidate around.
Report spam or abuse
And if you can be involved in politics for that many decades and still be (relatively for a politician, not ramen noodle) broke, well, then you MUST be honest!
Report spam or abuse
Read Lessons for the Young Economist by Murphy.
Report spam or abuse
Yes, I've read two of Paul's books and have also read "The Law" by Frederic Bastiat. Those worked fine until the 1860's, but as industry grew these methods have become obsolete as the primary focus of companies moved from providing a service to making a profit at any cost.
Report spam or abuse
If I were him, I would've said "Well, to understand why I take social security, you need to remember what social security is! Social security is the government taking your money and then giving it back to you when you retire. I paid my money and I will sure as hell collect it back- what I'd like to avoid is having my grandchildren do the same thing, because there is no such thing as a perfectly run federal system, so why not just avoid this redistribution altogether as soon as we possible can?"
Report spam or abuse
PART 2 Here's a question though: If you banned corporations from making political contributions, wouldn't they just do it through an individual? Sounds like a good law, but I don't see how it could actually be enforced. Wouldn't it actually just make it harder to tell which politician is in who's hands?
Report spam or abuse
U all are dumbasses!! its a 2 min and u already judges a video that is put out of context. watch the entire original video. he explains why he is on SS.
Report spam or abuse
He's not an idiot. He's made plenty of money in gold stocks. The idiots are all of us who directly or by apathy approve of the Federal Reserve.
Report spam or abuse
No, you are totally wrong. I won't bother arguing with you though. Read The Jungle by Upton Sinclair to get an idea of factories without government regulations.
Report spam or abuse
If a highwayman stole money from you, and threw back some coins at you, is it hypocritical to condemn the highwayman while picking the coins up off the ground? That's what Ron Paul is like, he disproves of the highwayman but is willing to take back some of what was taken from him. It would only be hypocrisy if Ron Paul went around criticising people for accepting social security.
Report spam or abuse
Doesn't that show that the federal government is largely incapable of not screwing the system up? To me it does.
Report spam or abuse
Um, well I believe the system worked otherwise (look at money flow in the past election when compared to previous elections) for as long as we've had groups that have monitored campaign finance.
Report spam or abuse
Have you read any Austrian Economics or were you just a blind follower? Most of his followers follow him because of the message, which they've concluded through independent thought and deductive reasoning.
Report spam or abuse
What a fucking hypocrite. I deserve social security, it works for me. It won't work for you, so you shouldn't get it or want it. Go fuck yourself Ron Paul.
Report spam or abuse
PART 1 I said a state focused system, not a "system where states have all of the power". The federal government would still manage those things you mentioned if the constitution was obeyed, but it wouldn't do much else.
Report spam or abuse
And to this I'm sure the reporter would immediatly respond with some paraphrasing of "But... but... you are old... and broke... and old.... did I mention old? Like, because you collect retirement..... old...."
Report spam or abuse
He was forced to pay into Social Security like everyone else, why shouldn't he get some of his money back? BTW/ he elected NOT to participate in the very LUCRATIVE Congressional Pension Plan which affords 100% payments for 5 years of service at age 62... I didn't see that ignorant talking head bring up that point.
Report spam or abuse
to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...