BMW Z4 3,0si Acceleration 0-200 km/h with 265 HP

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
57,089
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • why don't you let us see your mileage??

  • Your Opel astra do,what?Ha...The same?Dont be ridiculous....10~seconds slower is the same?

    Even Opel astra OPC 240ps doesnt"do the same"

    Funny guy!

see all

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Noname2354 around 20 liters for 100 miles dude

  • how many miles u get from a tank when you drive like in the video? or whats the avarage?

  • it's not a 3,0si............

  • LOOOL my Fiat Tipo 2.0 16v is just as fast hahaha  and I got 160 horses lol

  • aren't we're talkin bout pure z4 3.0 si coupe 265 bmw power, aren't we're? and please i'm beggin on my kneez, someone let me inform about the fuckin opc. who the fuckin hell is opc?

    thank you!

  • not even the opc with 240 hp can do the same:D

    265hp on 1,3 tons;)

  • @staggabob

    Well that depends what you consider sports cars. Most of the ones i know go under 5. Theres only a few that dont. Vette, 911, 97+ NSX, 98+ Trans Am / Camaro all go under 5. And few come very close, M3, RX7..

  • @Grodinz But that wasn't your point. You said that MOST 90s sports cars hit 60 in under 5 seconds which wasn't true.

    No-one here said the Z4 was the fastest car on the road, you could name a whole bunch of quicker modern cars- Evo, Scooby...even the new Megane RS without having to stretch to supercars. But it's definitely not slow!

  • @staggabob

    Yeah, but point being that this really isnt some kind of technical breakthrough or even that fast car to begin with, especially for its price.

    Fun car to drive yes, but fast? No.

    Z4 starts at what 47k and goes up to 62k $ or so, for an example you can get a corvette for this price. And looking at laptimes at the ring, even old C5 vette did 7:56 where Z4M could only do 8:12. And C5 is 90s.

    Obviously the BMW is better quality, but looking at the performance, im not impressed.

  • @staggabob Actually I called it a bargain but at 1996 prices ($50k) a 300ZX would cost $72k today! 

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more