Chrysler LHS (3.5L) VS. Lincoln Continental (4.6L)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,047
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 4, 2011

this guy decided he wanted to play cat & mouse with me in the lincoln.
we had fun until i just kicked it down & got beside him then he slowed down...like WTF

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (gearhead291)

  • While im on the subject, the goddamn sonata makes 274 hp stock with a 19 inch turbocharger and a 2.0 liter inline 4, this only 220 and 274 HP out of a goddamn 4 something liter 8 is a fucking JOKE. I understand these cars are geared toward longevity, comfort and reliability but let's get fucking real, eve back in the day, these engines were old ass slow ass technology, I AM a former panther platform owner, so I DO know.

  • @NancyPelosi1954 yea the NEW sonata. this engine was developed almost 20 years ago. and im sure 20 years from now there will be a new engine that will be MUCH better. and THIS 4.6L DOHC 32v V8 makes 290hp in the mark viii, with a dull factory tune. and ill blow the fucking doors off your sonata and a grand marquis with a slightly tuned continental.

  • @gearhead291 Highly doubt it, because then to be fair, I'd have to tune the sonata, with poweraxel's ecu reflash, it's putting 276 hp to the wheels...put an intake on, 2.5-3inch exhaust to quad tips, turbo timer and boost controller, remove 153 mph ecu limit... see ya later because were well over 300 HP at the wheels and much lighter. Moving on.

  • @NancyPelosi1954 if you wanna talk mods. you have no ground to stand on. a 4.6l v8 has wayyyyyyy more potential than a little 2.0l i-4

see all

All Comments (35)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @polopy2 Yeah their soaking wet with pussy juice and still faster than a continental! hahahahaha

  • @NancyPelosi1954 I hear sonata's are for pussies. moving on

  • @02DodgeIntrepidRT Everyone will make sure to really take time out ot the day to value your opinion.

  • and remember. 4 cylinders are for guys with tiny dicks. V8s are for people who have balls. And the Chrysler 3.5L engines got balls also

  • I eat ricers everyday with my 2002 Dodge Intrepid R/T 3.5L H.O :)

  • @zacchevy632 I'll tell you what, you call me or contact me on here when you have that kind of free cash to transform a frontwheel drive, 5,000 LBS Family luxury sedan into a monster, until then, like I said before, keep dreaming because there is a good reason no body mods out continentals. I know you guys are butthurt about a turbo i4 having more READY potential but let's not get panties too far bunched eh? Detuned cobra engine..GREAT it USED to be a Cobra engine! LOL

  • @NancyPelosi1954 hey wanna talk mods let me gor grab a supercharger off of a terminator cobra and put down a modest 390 hp, this is a detuned cobra motor aluminum block 32 valve v8, and btw sir you are an idiot because the continental is a D186 platform which is not a panther platform... A town car is on the panther platform and these conti's blow those boats away so there is no comparison, good day

  • @gearhead291 IF by potential you also mean pure straight line, sure then again you have to consider your live rear axel and primitive breaking system, you'd have about as close to zero cornering ability as one could get in a semi-modern vehicle. It would be like fred flintsone crashing his stone wheeled chariot of retardation in the modern age because he modded a car that isn't EVER meant to be modded. SWEET!

  • @gearhead291 Your absolutely right, BUT, not in a 5,000 lbs front wheel drive vehilce you dumb broad.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more