Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Lee Doren debates Charles Johnson at the 2010 FSP Liberty Forum: Part 1/4

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,612
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 23, 2010

Mark Edge of FreeTalkLive had Lee Doren of BureauCrash and Charles Johnson of ALL and C4SS on for an extra segment to discuss "left" vs "right" libertarianism.

http://bureaucrash.com
http://radgeek.com
http://freetalklive.com

http://libertyactivism.info
http://blogofbile.com
http://jailedactivist.info
http://armorforactivists.com

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • The ONLY way voluntary socialism could even begin to hope to work is at the level of commune. It absolutely will NEVER work on a state, much less national level.

  • Lee Doren is mostly a conservative ideologue.

see all

All Comments (41)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The guy in the black jacket knows Lee's full of it.

  • @NewVinland Also, Property is Impossible.

  • The republicans backed by Joseph Stalin....lolwut!?

  • one vulgar libertarian (conservative in disguise) and one vulgar left-libertarian. i fucking hate both of u.

  • Lee Doren blocked me from commenting on any of his videos.

    I was surprised to see him in a debate because he does not like to be shown that he is wrong.

  • Lee Doren has no clue what he is talking about. Proudhon said property is theft, but also said that property is liberty. By property in the first sense he means government backing titles and in the latter sense he means those actually putting use to land.

  • Lee Doren. WINNING!

  • @mikeyboy236 Targeting Civilians at Hiroshima and Nagasaki

    by Anthony Gregory, August 6, 2004

    google it

  • @avariceichiban Sounds like a decent read got a source you could point us to?

  • @questionmarkjones Japanese were starving and prepared to surrender. US did not accept the terms of surrender.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more