House of Commons protests 2004
Top Comments
All Comments (50)
-
@kanenkitten : Having been a student of parliamentary affairs for thirty-five (35) years, I should know !
-
@MusicPredominates: And he's entitled to use it as well!
-
@ajuk1 That's true. For all we know it could have be Antrax or some other chemical Bio-Agent. But considering what is was, it should have be contained.
-
odious ferry. id like to chase him down on a horse
-
was this filmed on a calculator
-
@madabbafan hahahahahahahahaha
-
FATHERS4JUSTICE
are making a difference little by little... im not a father but that a movement id like to join and support
-
PEOPLE YOUR GOVERMINT IS CORRUPT YOU MUST RISS AGANST IT ANSWER IS EGYPT.
-
God damn it, Blair was pwning Michael Howard at the time, as well.
-
Barrett .50 Calibre these Eco bastards of the Commons.
What's with ths shitty quality?
ajuk1 1 year ago 21
Technically the Speaker made a mistake. He should have declared a lock in for all those in the house until they knew what the powder was. As it turned out it was harmless but it should have still been contained
madabbafan 2 years ago 17