Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Video: Feds fire on fleeing Brown supporter in New Hampshire

Sponsor: http://SakalCAI.com - Exclusive footage of Federal agents' infamous encounter with "dog walker" Danny Riley during 8-month "standoff" with NH tax protesters Ed and Elaine Brown. Vid was s...  
 
Customize

More From: RidleyReport

NH: U.S. Marshals reverse their story about Brown raid5:21
2,061 views
NH: I interview U.S. Marshal in New Hampshire (sort of)8:23
2,066 views
NH: Elaine Brown speaks to supporters from prison (1 of 2)7:12
2,425 views
NH: Mysterious group 'sics cops on Ridley Report7:00
11,611 views
Concord NH: U.S. Marshals start requiring ID at courthouse4:58
1,946 views
Tax Protester Elaine Brown returns to New Hampshire1:54
1,253 views
YouTuber arrest sparks instant protest at NH jail5:35
1,617 views
NH Dems oust gun-grabbing rep2:56
2,767 views
NH: Lauren's last moments before FedArrest9:59
1,907 views
Manchester NH: Cop questions me for videotaping police cars5:04
53,069 views
Defense hints Feds wanted Brown dead (IRS, income tax)5:34
825 views
NH: Gun activist open carries into Manchester police station7:50
19,835 views
NH:Ed Brown protest interrupted by Fed manhunt - part 2 of 25:05
6,132 views
NH:  Elaine Brown, supporters, plead the 5th4:25
1,414 views
Caught on tape: NH cops try to question Ridley Report1:50
30,641 views
NH: Feds use force to stop "unlicensed counseling" 2/29:18
2,543 views
NH: Authorities turn blind eye to illegal puppet show4:47
1,251 views
Keene NH: Ridley Report, informed juries & Free Minds TV1:11
828 views
Ed Brown supporter in court 12/7/07 - 1 of 25:30
764 views
NH: Victimless Brown backer gets 36 years - 3/36:47
1,010 views

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
185 ratings
Sign in to rate
19,519 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (6)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (207)   Options

Loading...
DecimusAquila (5 days ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
I hope these fed motherfuckers get a bullet in their asses.
 0
Marked as spam
Why cant they just leave people alone? them not paying taxes arent hurting anyone....they just know if they dont, then others wont and the government cant have that.
edmasterson (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
FED FUCKIN PIGS
287654321 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Murderous marshalls are cowards hiding in scrub like rapists waiting for a victim. They're also terrorists. Remember, "kill the T so we'll be safe." You marshalls (pubic enemy) should be shooting one another left & right so the public will be safe from your tyranny.
Love me. Love my smart-ass wise cracks, traitors.
laosuwan (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
the marshall service was formed to capture run away slaves who crossed state lines. during prohibition they murdered hundreds of opponents of prohibition in the midwest. in the 70s the murdered hundreds of puerto ricans who supported statehood. and so it goes.
iworkwithdeadppl (3 months ago) Show Hide
 -6
Marked as spam
truthadvocate (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Exactly. They did not have the power to tax in this way, until the 16th Amendment was added.

And the 16th amendment is invalid, because involuntary servitude means involuntary servitude. If they were only talking about slavery, then they would not have stated "neither slavery nor involuntary servitude."

When a judge claims that having our wages stolen by the government under the real threat of violent force & imprisonment, is not involuntary servitude, they are denying the reality of the IRS.
RetSquid (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The courts do not agree with you:

If the requirements of the tax laws were to be classed as servitude, they would not be the kind of involuntary servitude referred to in the Thirteenth Amendment.
Porth v. Brodrick, 214 F.2d 925, 926 (10th Cir. 1954).
truthadvocate (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Courts disagree with men who wrote & signed our founding documents, so I don't take that personally.

I think it's quite predictable that a coercively monopolistic court system would generate unjust & unlawful decisions.
RetSquid (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
But because the court did decide that way it is now the law.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.