On September 20th, I posted a comment on Alex Jone's InfoWars.com website on the "Glenn Beck's a Libertarian Now" article, only to have it deleted! My other non-topic related comment wasn't deleted, just the one worried about some fellow to whom has a blatantly distorted perspective of reality.
(The message I replied to...)
thefreedomwriter Reply:
September 20th, 2009 at 5:30 pm
This is kind of like Braveheart
Alex = Braveheart
Glenn = Robert the Bruce
Robert the Bruce: Now, I know youve sacrificed much. But fighting these odds looks like rage, not courage.William Wallace: Its well beyond rage. Help me. In the name of Christ, help yourselves. If we join, we can win. If we win, well then well have what none of us has ever had before: a country of our own.
GB leads us astray.
Robert the Bruce: I have nothing. Men fight for me because if they do not, I throw them off my land and I starve their wives and children. Those men who bled the ground red at Falkirk fought for William Wallace. He fights for something that I never had. And I took it from him, when I betrayed him. I saw it in his face on the battlefield and its tearing me apart.
And this was my original (deleted) comment...
thefreedomwriter,
That's an excellent job quoting from a movie...
(Here comes that Constructive Criticism you are not going to like)
...it's too bad you wasted your memorization skills on a syndication of truth created from a council of liars (Hollywood). I would recommend spending your idle time in a more constructive fashion, studying the lectures of scholars (and quoting from them) rather than absorbing the fiction of liars my friend, and I say this with the utmost respect.
You see, when people start utilizing fiction as a means to convey reality it is often the product of what is called a "hyper-reality", in lay terms it is where the line between fantasy and reality blur mentally. The reason for this is often not because of over-exposure to fantasy (ie. movies for example), but because of the subjective formatting in which most media curtails. It has been labeled "Brain Washing". but I tell you that it's an improper definition. 'Brain Washing' typically evolves the removal of one thought (or cleansing of thought) for the replacement of a programmed one. No, the more proper term for this is psychological manipulation, aka "Brain Conditioning", which can in turn leads to the same results as brain washing. :)
I understand that a lot of people do it, use popular media as an analogy or metaphor, but that's exactly how it works! Please understand that I am singling you out, however it is not for the stereo-typical reasons, I don't get a cheap thrill out criticizing people, or do I wish to distill drama. I am doing because I am concerned about people like yourself, and because of people like yourself is the reason why I have invested a lot of research into this topic and am producing a documentary on it. One I hope you personally will get a chance to watch.
(It will be a video of course, because while your exposure may have not yet succumbed you to an unwillingness to read, others unfortunately will barely listen to anything less than a format that they can understand - Video.)
The reason it is so common my friend can be summarized into one simple fact - Mass Media Conditioning and Propaganda. I could say that people don't know just how far the "rabbit hole" goes, but I know better, because I won't dare attempt to use the effects of movie/media conditioning has had on you as a means to manipulate you, so instead I will say you just don't know how far it goes. ;)
So next time I hope you will also reconsider using media conditioning as a means to convey your message, one I hope that you choose well. Like alcoholism it is sickness that cannot be treated until we realize that it is there. (psst. We ALL are there.) :)
Peace
- KrisKhaos
Was my comment that terrible to be removed? Did it come off reading like some advertisement?
You be the judge.
Please be sure to keep your comments clean and respectful. :)
It is most important to realize that Beck is a shill who is quickly overtaking a movement that WE helped build. We can not let Neo-Con garbage like Beck ruin such a wonderful movement. No matter how much he comes out and says he apologizes and that he's "like us" now, we all know he's lying through his teeth. If we allow him to keep this up we'll be doing damage control for the next few years instead of working on our plans for 2010 & 2012. We must distance ourselves from him as much as possible
AndyShow 2 years ago
People in the media don't change there stance without good reason to, they're more opt to fake it and make up reason to why they are right (even when they know they are wrong) than take the chance of people loosing faith in there judgment.
I don't trust Beck as far as I can throw him, but personally I will give anyone a chance to redeem themselves. Now that doesn't mean I won't keep a very careful and close eye on the fellow, because trust is something earned, and not something just given.
KrisKhaos 2 years ago
You need to understand much of these attackers on Infowars are either OCD people or cointelpro .. The dead giveaway on this is like DRdissent .. this punk comes out of nowhere and obsesses on infowars .. He's waged his retard propaganda against him and look how he leaves a comment so quickly.. then comes out trying to debunk 911 .. Now this is all designed to break up the movement and get people infighting just like it has. It's effective and those keen on this can spot it.
Jerrycurlonfire 2 years ago
I was merely asking a simple question, just a mere curiosity. Did I not make it clear enough that I did not believe there was anything sinister about AJ?
I was hoping my intent would not be interpreted as such, I am still not that good at talking to myself (recording) yet. :)
The fact that the comment was deleted is the least of my concerns, I was more interested in publicizing the deleted comment itself. I just did not understand why it was deleted, that's all. :)
KrisKhaos 2 years ago