More Scientists don't see CO2 as temperature driver

Scientists from New York conference on Climate explaining that co2 is not driving temperature.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Co2
• global
• temperature
• warming
• false
• hoax

[checkyoursources]

Very few climatologists went to this particular conference because it was organised by the likes of monckton and the oil industry.

Meehl 2004 shows that just 15-20% of warming was due to the sun in the last 100 years.

Mid-century cooling involved aerosols and is irrelevant for recent global warming. Wild et al. (2007)

Arctic sea-ice cover in December 2010 was the lowest on record- WMO

Willie Soon was funded by the American Petroleum Institute!

[Albertkallal]

If aerosols are responsible for the 30 to 40 year cooling trend, then what was the reason for the previous 30 to 40 year cooling trend? (whale blubber being burned in lamps?). So if temperature goes up it must be man's co2, but when it goes down, it must be soot, but then explain the previous cooling + warming cycle then? Too funny you are!

[checkyoursources]

@Albertkallal Climate reacts to whatever forces it to change at the time; humans are now the dominant forcing. your logic is skewed, you seem to be saying that it is impossible that huamns can affect the environment- It has occured to you that both lightning AND matches can start a fire?

97% of climatologists are saying that the majority of the warming since the 1970's is best explained by human emissions of GHG's and it's subsequent effects.

[Albertkallal]

No, the science does not show that most of this warming is due to man's co2. Best numbers show IPCC off by a factor of about 6 times. The data is a mess right now. If temperature data been corrected for urban heat effect then why does rural vs urban temperature show different rates with something that Supposedly been corrected? The idea of using an Alcohol Thermometer from a 100 year old wooden box can be used for any useful scientific comparison to a modern Digital thermometer is ridiculous.

[checkyoursources]

@Albertkallal Actually the science does show that most of this warming is due to man's co2: Surface measurements find more downward infrared radiation warming the planet's surface while satellite measurements of infrared spectra over the past 40 years observe less energy escaping to space at the wavelengths associated primarily with CO2. For empirical evdience read Harries 2001, Griggs 2004, Philipiona 2004, Evans 2006, Chen 2007, Wang 2009. Urban and rural regions show the same warming trend

[Albertkallal]

And what caused the previous warming period then? We had higher temperatures in the past with less co2 and we had lower temperatures in the past with more co2 then today. Simply put the science and data does not show man's co2 is driving climate as claimed by the IPCC. We not see the warming predicted by IPCC and their models. The effect of man's co2 is way overblown and CO2 warming is logarithmic in nature. So it is like black coat of paint on glass window and additional coats do very little.

[xingwei12]

@LeeKwangEng This world worry,s me i sit back and watch and think why does no one ever look into things or research any more .People have stopped thinking sad really ">>

[LeeKwangEng]

@xingwei12

Actually most of them are thinking in this line of thought!

That is the sad part. :(

[xingwei12]

@LeeKwangEng +P Careful some may think where serious lol 

[LeeKwangEng]

@xingwei12

Yes, Yes you are right! Sun has nothing to do with it! Waters are melting, its all humans' fault, we should kill ourselve, I will enjoy the floride water, Hmm.. Taste good, OMG food, wow so nutritous that filled with Sodium and Full of energy, the air are fresh with our good government spraying good stuffs in the air to keep the earth cool, the economic has not collapse, its we who did not upgrade our skills. We are the problem, we are the cancel cell of the world, oh dear...

[xingwei12]

@LeeKwangEng NO stop do not Question ,Do not say facts .Obey your tv  .

-.-

[checkyoursources]

@BKKVids According to the World radiation centre's PMOD data on TSI and NASA's SORCE satellite data you are wrong about the sun being resposnible for the majority of recent warming as TSI (solar output) is falling yet temps are increasing i.e. the Sun and climate are going in opposite directions and you are incorrect.

[checkyoursources]

@BKKVids Every major science academy on the planet and the vast majority of scientific papers disagree with you so your odds of being correct are less than mine. Please name a more likely explanation for the majority of warming since the 1970's than anthropogenic global warming?

[BKKVids]

@checkyoursources

of course it's larger than either one alone...you only posted two things, you supercalculator.

People who think humans are more powerful than nature all sound as idiotic as you. Climate change is natural.