Kent Hovind on Carbon Dating Part 1
Loading...
Loading...
19,225
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Video Responses
This video is a response to Evolution and its Repercussions Part 1
Loading...
- 2:40:23Kent Hovind Debates at Berkleyby jesse88574,554 views
- 1:05Kent Hovind gets stumpedby Wolden89186,402 views
- 8:49Kent Hovind on Carbon Dating Part 2by Chumnah9,770 views
- 7:49Evolution vs Creation : # 2 Blind Faith & Scien...by zonkas58,751 views
- 30:58Dr. Massimo Pigliucci vs Kent Hovind - Part Iby infidelguy36,862 views
- 9:55Kent Hovind is Crazy #25: Carbon Datingby Trin80ty2,153 views
- 4:44How Reliable Is Carbon Dating?by AtheistExperience32,396 views
- 9:07Dr Kent Hovind explains why the KJV Bible is Ac...by GodGunsGutsGlory4KJV5,828 views
- 3:10Carbon Datingby flanagkj67,247 views
- 9:29Radiocarbon Datingby bozemanbiology6,391 views
- 9:55Kent Hovind one vs three (Embry Riddle)4-15by jesusLostChildren7777,219 views
- 9:22Kent Hovind Vs. Graduate Student (1 of 3)by DarwinsLobster44,428 views
- 3:01:08Creation Seminar 7 - Kent Hovind - Questions an...by skellys319,588 views
- 9:55Kent Hovind debate vs three scientist P.h.d 1-15by jesusLostChildren77723,653 views
- 9:42Kent Hovind vs Molecular Geneticistby thewayofgrowingpains149,965 views
- 1:57:22Kent Hovind - CSE02 - The Garden of Eden (FULL)by MartinRayburn2,896 views
- 6:57Radiocarbon Datingby stevebd124,130 views
- 58:44Age Of The Earth by Dr. Kent Hovindby MadScience170,106 views
- 15:11The Ark of the Covenant found. Kent Hovind expl...by mixcatcom3,403 views
- 43:43Conspiracy Theory w/ Jesse Ventura - Banned Pol...by Chumnah413 views
is this a joke lol
xpforl 3 weeks ago
Carbon 14 is everywhere, so what? It is made underground when exposed to radiation.
The earth and dinosaur fossils are not dated with the C14, it don't work dummies.
gregrutz 1 month ago
@gregrutz
i meant to say that it is not more than 30,000 years old, according to john bada at the scripps oceanography institute. certainly no more than 50,000 years old since carbon14 was found in it.
jndillaha 1 month ago
@gregrutz
oh but there is carbon14 in some dinosaur fossils. this poses a problem for you. im sure you and i have talked about this before but i will bring it up again. why is carbon14 found in dinosaur fossils like the one mary schweitzer found in montana, with soft tissue (not biofilm, this has been proven)? please explain this. the presence of dinosaur soft tissue with carbon14 in it proves that the dinosaur is not 30,000 yers old.
jndillaha 1 month ago
@gregrutz Well these are your facts not mine. Again look up the Word science in dictionary. Assumption has nothing to do with science
ProMajtas 1 month ago
@ProMajtas There is a problem. Scientists think the river cut the canyon starting about 6 million years but the whole area was though to have been raised up 400 million years ago when the Rocky Mts. were formed. Why don't you study the problem and tell us your answer. You have been given the facts, you can't chnage them.
gregrutz 1 month ago
@gregrutz as far as I know you don't need a PHD professor in geology to figure out that water doesn't flow uphill.
ProMajtas 1 month ago
Date the fossil? But there is no F**king carbon in it !
gregrutz 1 month ago
@ProMajtas ''The top of Grand Canyon is higher than the place where the river enters the canyon?''
Did you learn that form the kid Eric Hoving WHO HAS THE RIVER FLOWING THE WRONG DIRECTION ! I would look for a real geologist to get my science.
gregrutz 1 month ago