Lesson 11/16: Biological Systematics Part 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,978
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 23, 2009

One of the first things taught in biology is the classification of living things. The systems used today place every species into nested groups according to similarities and differences in anatomy. Do these relationships make more sense when working from within an evolutionary paradigm, or from within a special creation paradigm?

  • likes, 17 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (214)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Very enjoyable thank you

  • great video thanks

  • very interesting thanks

  • i enjoyed this vid

  • you have some great stuff here

  • love the video really good

  • The Man created God!!!!!!!

  • there is difference between the cars analogy and cladistics classification.

    the 4-2 door, colour, and body are functionally unrelated. However flowers and seeds are related functionally, so of coarse every flowering plant must have seeds because flowers' function is to spread pollen for fertilization and seed formation, so of coarse God didn't create flowering seedless plants, and amniotic fluid membrane is needed for internal gestation .

  • Wow. Knock your head dude. You just said you can't make a heredity chart with things that are designed. LMAO. No REALLY!? Because they didn't evolve! Just cause we take variations in a kind of species and line'em up all biased like on a "heredity chart" full of missing links and gaps doesn't demonstrate evolution. That same thing can be done with skeletons of species alive today.

    It does not follow that because all life shares a common biochemical basis, that relationship was cause by evolution.

  • Your argument about common design with the cars was extremely biased. You grouped the cars in a way that did not allow for maxium selection even though you could have and then you say that common decent which can also be grouped in an unfair way does. Straw man. This guy is a fraud. Evolution is what sets kids back. Variation and heredity exist in design, but rejects adding information to the gene pool. Evolution is the opposite of what God teaches. Read your bible.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more