Manuel DeLanda - The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. 2007 1/5
Top Comments
All Comments (100)
-
@pilkingtonphil And then again Lacan also stated that his erect penis was equal to the square root of minus one so how seriously should we take him either?
-
Sokal and Bricmont just take passages out of context and point to them, and basically shriek at the reader "SEE????!?!??! SEE!???!!? THIS MAKES NO SENSE!??!??! WORDS AREN'T SUPPOSED TO MEAN DIFFERENT THINGS!!! DON'T LOVE THEM!!!! LOVE MEEEE!"
-
@StopTouchingMyFood architecture is philosophy
-
@Hofsteder read "Gilles Deleuze - an Introduction" by Todd May. He explains Deleuze's philosophy and gives plenty of examples of "valuable, original insight by Deleuze". However, to put them in a short comment limited to 350 characters is simply too reductive.
-
@StopTouchingMyFood - listen closer and you may hear it.
-
@royalyon "non-evolutionary" something tells me you haven't read DeLanda or Deleuze...
-
@OmarThePug Just because it appears to be 'crazy' to you doesn't make it so. It's kind of funny how many people misread Deleuze so constantly.
-
You just don't understand it. Too bad.
-
Deleuze does not offer anything of insight. It's superficiality dressed as depth.
It gives Philosophy a bad name.
-
02:35, and there we have Gilles reincarnate...



What Delanda is getting at here is Deleuze's transcendental realism, which for philosophers of most guises has to be seen as (at least) a bold and novel move. Unfortunately, we're going to get the whole history of his thinking before we get to a discernable philosophical point. The way that much of continental philosophy is communicated does it no favours at all.
sssswwwsssss 3 years ago 6
I like pizza
Rahab111222 2 years ago 5