Manuel DeLanda - The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. 2007 1/5

Yes, and this is why analytic philosophy is actually *the* most boring thing in the world.

Umm... I don't believe Deleuze would use the term unconscious except to trash it.

i dont think so. he uses this term in several writings, just like the anti-oedipe, there the unconscious is the internalized and at the same time externalized machine of capitalism

to be "more like"? :)
you mean, more like the animals that therefore we always already are? :)~

to consumed by politics, not that its not important.
im glad he through in the not important part because i would hardly get that impression from reading deleuze.

de landa is only a mediocre interpreter of deleuze. his earlier books (war in the age of; 1000 years of) before he decided to explicate deleuze like we were all adolescents were much better.
besides, who the fuck types his name into youtube and wants to watch him lecture? - i wanted to see his fucking films

well give us better inrerpreters

egs, manuel delanda, thank you, thank you, thank you. you're making everything a lot easier for me.

...Although there are serious chunks of that book I reject completely. Back to your comment though. Does focusing on secondary psychoanalytic processes deny the history of psychoanalysis and its effects?

I don't know what happened to the first part of the comment. It seems to be missing. I repeat more or less what I wrote before... The serious chunks of the book I reject are from Deleuze and Guattari's work on Kafka. I think I said something about the way they perceived Kafka as creating from language, a machinic use for expression, rather than providing material for distressing psychoanalytic reproductions.