Scientists presents Proof of Intelligent Design ! Charles Darwin - Origin of Species - Evolution Disproved, Refuted by Biologists and Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munich universities ! Creation proved by Scientists ! Part 5 / 7

Intelligent Design proved by - Biologists, Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munchen - debating and refuting Evolution Theory ! Scientists presents Proof of Intelligent Design ! Charles Darwin - Origin of Species - Disproved, Refuted by Biologists and Scientists !

Creation proved by Scientists !

Please watch all parts of this movie:

Part 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4z0IVivslc

Part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO7gV41PNcA

Part 3:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=og-ll0SZXNk

Part 4:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NQTMfG4FB4

Part 5:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpNt8d2jgSU

Part 6:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQh1E_jT8iw

Part 7:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cj3PWUF7zAw

Thank you for watching !


Tags: % can science prove that evolution in wrong? %* can science prove Existence of God? New York Times can science prove the the - universe was created? () (_)can science prove creation? can science disprove God? can science disprove creation? can science disprove evolution? Who created the universe? % What created the universe? How did everything begin? How did everything start? Is there a God who created the earth? Is there a God who created the universe? Do we %_ -,- % know everything about evolution? Tags (-): Do we know everything about creation? %* Is there a proof of creation? % Is there anybody out there? Is the truth is out there? Can we rely on science . regarding the evolution? Can we rely on Bible regarding the creation? Can we understand the creation of all things? ^*%$ Can we understand the evolution of all things?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Evolution
• is
• impossible
• really
• funny
• fun
• darwin
• dawkins
• Foundation
• charles
• richard
• christian
• evolution
• bible
• gospel
• children
• education
• James
• D.
• Watson
• creation
• science
• animation
• 3d
• maya
• idea
• Christofer
• Christoffer
• Hitchens
• creationist
• earth
• evolutionist
• theory
• creationism
• fossils
• dino
• dinosaurs
• t-rex
• ancient
• in
• biology
• the
• process
• of
• change
• inherited
• traits
• population
• organisms
• from
• one
• generation
• to
• next
• W.
• Hamilton
• Viruses
• Mind

[ArcanaKnight]

@Mogley None of that is really true. Your arguments rely upon ignorance, entirely subjective opinions, and a cherry-picking of the evidence.

[Mogley52]

NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.

[Mogley52]

ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!

[Mogley52]

GENETIC AND BIOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in the various forms of life. Genetic information can't happen by chance, so this is the best explanation. So-called junk DNA is not junk. These "non-coding" segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression (how, when, and where genes are expressed in the body). Read my Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!

[Mogley52]

NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a trait survives, that survival is called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM

[Mogley52]

APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.

[Mogley52]

AMINO ACIDS CAN COME BY CHANCE BUT NOT PROTEINS: Find out why. Read my Pravda Internet article: NASA, FANTASY, AND SCIENCE. Most (not all) scientists believe we're here by chance. That doesn't make the belief a scientific fact. Scientists are human and they have personal motives influencing their various beliefs concerning origins. Mathematical probability shows that it is not rational nor scientific to believe that DNA and life came about by chance. Study the evidence yourself!

[RuddyIPA]

I would like to take the time to thank the "designer" who came up with knees. Thank you so very much for such a crappy design. Were you high when you came up with that?

[RationalThinker1859]

@oopscanada Don't apologise. Interesting statement. Anyway to demonstrate that it is true or false?

Like a test, for example...

[oopscanada]

@fingleur1 That's it? That's your argument? a coconut? please, get a life.