The Elder Scrolls IV: Skyrim Early Gameplay Montage (Max PC Graphics)
Uploader Comments (TheJoaker)
All Comments (12)
-
@rytis1234567891 for some reason fx 1850 feels faster and smoother in windows 8 beta than in windows 7, sadly, its not stable enough to get a real reliable benchmark, I'm sure windows 8 handles the threading much better than windows 7 and the 4 modules 8 "cores" of the fx-8150 are able to truly shine
-
@joshodst You have no justification as to why or how intel is better, intel are a bunch of money thirsting faggots that will do anything to increase their profits. Also the word man implies that the person is at least 18, so where is the logical is that?, I don't take offence from something that doesn't make any sense. AMD is a good company, it's a company that actually cares about that consumer and doesn't force them to upgrade their fucking board every year.
-
@Kadriification lol yes intel is better i don't take sides LOL but you sounded like a five year old man ;) no offence
-
@TheJoaker put it this way 2600k has 8 cores,4 physical and 2 threads per core which is kinda like an 8 core,then the buldozer is an actual 8 core the best test for 8 threads in a game is crysis 2(which uses all 8 threads)and really there is no bottle necking in the game even on a phenom 2 quad
if i would have went amd,i would have bought the bulldozer quad core( ITS ONLY 115$!!!)
most games on anything higher then a phenom 2 955 quad core won't bottleneck (exept SKYRIM lol)
-
@rytis1234567891 Fine, your a fucking idiot...
-
@rytis1234567891 You sir are a fucking idiot, please educate yourself before you comment.
Man i know that the most of the load is putted on the gpu , but if we are to talk about cpu , fx 8150 is bad not good , thats the piont im trying to make , also do some rerasherch , 8150 is is lossing in some applications to i5 , if you take the new I7 2700k , it kill bulldozer in every benchmark . im not trying to be offensive , no not at all but its a fact
AMD BULLDOZER = FAIL ,SHIT , CRAP best words to describe it
rytis1234567891 3 months ago
@rytis1234567891 I heavily reviewed the benchmarks before buying the CPU. The bulldozer beats 2500k in most tests, except some where single-core performance (which is old technology) is used, and there's practically no threading. The bulldozer does lose to the 2600k in many tests, however this processor is more money. Just wait til more games come out that favor more cores, and until then just enjoy the more multi-tasking you can do with eight cores instead of four.
TheJoaker 3 months ago 2
FX -8150 IS PIECE OF SHIT TOTAL FAIL , ALL PEOPLE THAT BUY IT ARE NABNOBS , P.S I HAVE AMD PROCESOR AND AMD GPU SO DONT CALL ME INTEL BOY
rytis1234567891 3 months ago
@rytis1234567891 Most of the load for video games is placed on the GPU, so with a good video card the processor doesn't matter so much. The AMD 8150 may lose out on single core performance to its intel counterparts but that'll change as games become more properly threaded. I was rendering this video with Sony Vegas and playing this game on max at 60 fps without any problems.
TheJoaker 3 months ago