Ford Mustang convertible
2010 models mfg. after Dec. 2009
FRONTAL OFFSET TEST
OVERALL EVALUATION: Good
Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy kinematics
Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right
Acceptable Good Good Good Good Good
Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.
Good Good Acceptable Acceptable Marginal Marginal Poor Poor
Test details:
The Ford Mustang was re-engineered and restyled for the 2010 model year.
Two tests of a 2010 Mustang convertible were conducted. In the first test, forces recorded on the dummy's neck were high, leading to a poor head/neck injury rating and a poor overall rating. In response, Ford modified the convertible's front structure and the doors to improve occupant protection in frontal offset crashes begining with cars manufactured after December 2009 (note: information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on or near the driver door).
In the second test of a car built after the structural modifications were in place, the head/neck and overall ratings improved to good.
Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was well controlled. The driver side airbag deployed during the crash. After the dummy moved forward into the frontal airbag, its head contacted the side airbag.
Injury measures — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.
Ford Mustang convertible
2010 models mfg. before Jan. 2010
FRONTAL OFFSET TEST
OVERALL EVALUATION: Poor
Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy kinematics
Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right
Acceptable Poor Good Good Good Marginal
Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.
Good Good Acceptable Acceptable Marginal Marginal Poor Poor
Test details:
The Ford Mustang was re-engineered and restyled for the 2010 model year.
Two tests of a 2010 Mustang convertible were conducted. In the first test as detailed here, the head/neck and overall ratings were poor. In response, Ford modified the convertible's front structure and the doors to improve occupant protection in frontal offset crashes begining with cars manufactured after December 2009 (note: information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on or near the driver door).
In the second test of a car built after the structural modifications were in place, the head/neck and overall ratings improved to good.
Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement wasn't well controlled. The dummy's head hit the A-pillar, which bent downward and inward during the crash. There was also too much rearward movement of the steering wheel.
Injury measures — Measures taken from the chest and both legs indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. Forces on the neck and acceleration of the head were high when the head hit the A-pillar, indicating that neck injuries would be likely and head injuries possible.
It still looks possible to hit your head on the A pillar
juanpablofx 1 year ago 26
ugh convertibles are unsafe in general
alexkvaskov 1 year ago 18