"In the best interest" is a concept exactly like infinity, and equally impossible to attain without a magic crystal ball. Conversely, an order that attempts to "SERVE the best interest" represents just one of possibly several very good choices that could be made. A judge's determination of what might serve a child's best interest should not replace that of a parent, unless the parent is disqualified by a finding based on clear and convincing evidence that the parent will or has harmed the child.
These people are crazy. This is World Government abuse.
Does this broad know the can of worms these ideas will have.
Does she have kids?
chewbaca1989 3 years ago
"In the best interest" is a concept exactly like infinity, and equally impossible to attain without a magic crystal ball. Conversely, an order that attempts to "SERVE the best interest" represents just one of possibly several very good choices that could be made. A judge's determination of what might serve a child's best interest should not replace that of a parent, unless the parent is disqualified by a finding based on clear and convincing evidence that the parent will or has harmed the child.
steve66oh 3 years ago