Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Michael Tellinger and Willem de Swart : Space - Time cross over part 1 of 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,997
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 6, 2011

Michael Tellinger and Willem de Swart discuss the principles of the matrix of numbers that control this projected 'virtual reality'. A simple geometric and numeric description of why Time and Space are crossing over in 2012.

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Michaeltellinger)

  • Love this, thank you! (By the way, I noticed that the dogs were barking as you talked about god. dog god. Funny coincidence.)

  • @mseyler9

    Thanks for the encouragement. I've always wondered what people's reaction would be because its so different

see all

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This takes some getting your head round but it makes perfect sense. Also LOVE the accent :)

  • PT 4: All of human life is about making a decision for Christ during this temporary and electrically driven revivification phase we call mortality.

    OK, I'm done. LOL!

  • PT2: The devil intermediated with the electron and its abilities. The nerves were now driven by electrotonic/action potentials, the split hemispheres were bridged by this electric corpus callosum, and the sinoatrial node was pulsed. The synaptic gap was bridged by electrochemical neurotransmitters. Why the electron? Because it was only outside before the fall of man. Sin brought it inside and all our thinking is skewed by the devil's design. That's why I don't buy science or math at all.

  • PT 1: What if the electrotonic and action potentials of the nervous system and brain were a supervised phenomenon from an invisible 3rd party? I believe that when Adam and Eve sinned, they died physically because God ceased to communicate with them using sound energy (nerves are better suited to sound conduction than action potential). He created the synaptic gap, split the hemispheres of the brain and ceased to pulse the sinoatrial node. But before they hit the ground something happened.

  • 1 + 1 does not equal 2. Prove it. Peano Postulates? Principia Mathematica? We agree that 1 + 1 = 2 due to cognized pressuring down the least resistive pathways of neural effort; and reality is designed to oblige our modelling and fantasies according to fixed rules of engagement and only up to a certain neighbourhood of perception. There are 2 sets of rules: one made and enforced by God, the other made and enforced by the god of this world. Most of any higher math is part of the second set.

  • Anything beneath or beyond the level of our human sensorium and mental processing of the data contained in ordinary perception is modelled. We never prove anything in science; we simply validate or fail to validate models. To me, all of science and indeed math is a distraction away from truth. Logic is merely cognizant pressuring against the yielding and plastic backdrop of matter/energy. It's all fake. That's where my theory of the electron comes in!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more