Mark Steyn Slams Obama's Leadership Role in Libya

Author columnist Mark Steyn told Sean Hannity tonight that regarding Obama's leadership on the Libyan kinetic military man-caused disaster:

"I believe it's a Canadian general who's actually running the show. I said I thought it should be a Mexican general because as far as this administration is concerned this is clearly one of those jobs that Americans won't do.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Mark
• Steyn
• Sean
• Hannity
• Libya
• Obama
• Winning
• Gaddafi

[methodmaine]

Once again....Pie is ALL of yours faces! Ghaddaffi is out of power, in under one year and without a single injured or killed US soldier!

Obama- Osama Bin Laden, Gaddaffi = Less than one year.

Bush- Sadaam and tens of thousands of US soliders= 8 years and still counting...

[hookalakah]

"It’s not enough to understand how everybody in the room thinks. You have to decide which ones in the room are right, and stand with them. A leader is not a mediator or an umpire or a convener or a facilitator.

Sometimes, as Chris Christie put it, “the president has got to show up."

With each equivocation, the man in the Oval Office shields his identity and cloaks who the real Barack Obama is." --Maureen Dowd, New York Times, June 26, 2011

[dui3343]

when did this air?

[zegatone]

@rleary1

take care......

[zegatone]

@rleary1

dna is not always present, and the constitution that protects your rights, also protects the convicted;

as it is now, we spend more money keeping a person in death row, than one person in jail for life

we spend more money in jails than in education, we spend way much more money on warfare than caring for our children.

i am into child development, and studies have shown that helping the poor, including those in foster homes, get a degree pays great dividends, saves taxes as well

[zegatone]

@rleary1

i agree that failure starts at home; my large family was raised by my, the oldest and my mother after father had a heart attack, we did very well,

.

so, if women have "illegitimate" children, what do you do with those children?

if cons are concern about those children, they they should put more money into reducing births; at least be prochoice, like you

[zegatone]

@crazyknight2008

are you attending William funeral?...hehehehe



[zegatone]

@rleary1

lets figure your position; but before let me get you familiar with reality

over 70% of children have being raised by a single parent one time or another, and close to 30% are raised by single parents from birth to adulthood;

so, these children should not go to public schools, have medical services, including emergency, if the house of a single parent is burning, firemen should not help..same with police..how about driving on public roads?

see what i mean

have a nice day

[zegatone]

@rleary1

"do not want my tax to help single mothers"

so you want to punish their children because the women acted against your conservative values?

.

conservatives are blinded by their creed; they want to save embryos but once they are born, children are no longer worth investing money on; creating more social problems

educating our children, is cheaper than having drop-outs, crimes, uneducated people etc etc, more of your taxes will be used later if not used earlier

[zegatone]

@rleary1

you have some liberal values, but most are conservatives, .......if you are old, you know that conservatives used to rule the conservative creed, but after the civil right, the conservatives run to the republican side to hide their sins.

lets take one item at the time;

pro-gun; so am i, an i own guns, but being proguns does not mean you must have a gun

pro-choice, it does not mean they are for abortion; my sisters are pro-choice, but never aborted,

cont