Turn down the lights
Turn up the lights
Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Austrian Theory of the Trade Cycle

Presented by Roger W. Garrison at the 2009 Mises University. Recorded 27 July 2009 at the Ludwig von Mises Institute; Auburn, Alabama.  
 
Customize

More From: misesmedia

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
169 ratings
Sign in to rate
3,898 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (36)   Options

Loading...
wreagfe (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Wow, these are cool (star wars computer game) sound effects. I have the urge to applaud every time "the economy grows" or "people save more" ;)
UnhappyTestTubeBaby (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
This is an old post, but I wanted to contribute a couple of points towards your NFL example.

Remember the XFL? That was a riot. There was a Las Vegas team that hired strippers to work as cheerleaders.

The CFL has also experimented with expansion teams in the US with limited success.

The threat of competition is real, and in a very direct way.
asierra1492 (1 month ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
The only way to gain a big market share is by beating the competition by offering products of higher quality at lower prices. And if you get greedy and start increasing prices you will lose your market share as quicly as you won it. This is explained in the video i sent you.
asierra1492 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"There must be no alternatives to your product either in or outside of your market. The NFL has a virtual monopoly on Professional Football. "
Remember there is also the potential for competition. The reason the NFL doesnt raise prices and gives a bad service, its not only because there are substitute products but also the mere threat of new competition coming in.
thomasst2 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I completely agree. JP Morgan and Rockefeller went through similar situations as new competition found new, better and cheaper ways to produce. It forces the older competitors to constantly improve and anticipate future demand, which is overall better for the market.

But regulation creates barriers to this process, favoring bigger older connected firms at the expense of newer better firms and also customer preference.
asierra1492 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I never said anything bout regulation being a good thing though you might have missread my statement.
thomasst2 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Oh no. I understood what you said. I just meant to show that in order to maintain that free market share, you have to continue to beat your competitors, like you said.

Morgan and Rockefeller got big, but they couldn't stay big because smaller newer and better competitors entered the market and started to destroy their market share.

I was adding regulation to show that old firms not willing to accept free market competition will as for regulation to restrict competition.

Sorry for the mix up
constablekohler (2 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
one of your best videos!
FafyrdGir (2 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
THANK YOU!
This is excellent. I'll keep it forever :)
ExquisiteDoom (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Very good points, i appreciate it, it will help me refute better against those socialists and liberal minded fools (offensive, but true). Thanks.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.