The 9/11 Un-debunked series is a series of videos made in response to the videos posted by RKOwens4 and also to respond to the claims of other so-called 9/11 debunkers. The series does not address every subject raised by RKOwens4 in his videos, only the most important ones. The series mainly focuses on the collapse of the WTC and Building 7. The series does address the issues of the Pentagon and Flight 93 some what. Other issues are not raised simply because either the theories have no merit and have been debunked or the issue has been debated to the point where all the information has been exhausted. This video series does not endorse any "missile" or "no planes" theories. It focuses on scientific evidence based from the work of Dr. Steven Jones, Professor David Ray Griffin, Jim Hoffman, and Kevin Ryan. It is strongly encouraged to use this video series to answer any of the claims made by so-called "debunkers." Thank you for taking the time to inform yourself. I DO NOT OWN THE MUSIC OR PICTURES SHOWN IN THIS VIDEO SERIES.
@jrvenice1999 stop talking bullshit will ya.george bush and his adminsistration are the real terrorists
nb45001 7 months ago
I've watched the first two of your RKOwens un-debunking videos and you have failed to un-debunked anything. Terrorists hijacked the planes, flew them into the towers. The towers collapsed from structural failure. That's it.
jrvenice1999 9 months ago
dang, this means I better replace my 25yr. old wood stove. I've had that sucker cherry hot way to many times. it may global collapse one day. lol. and thats forced air! very hot, red hot. crap.
SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 10 months ago
@Merlin5x5
I think it is you who is missing the point. The chemical compositions are totally different. Please view this: watch?v=XdI7CaAR264
citizenfor911truth1 1 year ago
@citizenfor911truth1
Lol, ok, I watched Steven Jones do his schpiel.
Here is the problem. He is not testing, and the truther lab is not testing, the primer paint exposed to the heat and chemicals, like al oxide, at the WTC.
I mean, isn't that the point? How else would you get RED and Grey chips from Red primer paint?
Merlin5x5 1 year ago
@Merlin5x5
I sorry to break this to you, but the chips are not paint. This has conclusively been confirmed: watch?v=hcFOd16IHdE minute 5:47
I'd watch the whole thing if I were you, but that is the most important section.
citizenfor911truth1 1 year ago
@citizenfor911truth1
Nano thermite was NOT discovered, paint chips were.
Al oxide and iron oxide are the 3rd and 4th most common materials on earth.
The truther lab report, is not science for a dozen reasons, notably that NO ONE, even other Truthers, can reproduce the results.
Add in some bizarre sources, poor methods, a LAB that consists of ONE PT, retired, ex BYU chem professor, and a fly-by-night, $600 bribe to publish it in a foriegn journal, and it's a joke.
Merlin5x5 1 year ago
@Merlin5x5
Actually, the cores barely survived either collapse. I have a video on this subject as well. watch?v=zGzJxDSVRTA
As the essay points out, the huge loads being shifted to the perimeter would exert massive forces on the perimeter columns and cause them to bow inward.
citizenfor911truth1 1 year ago
@Merlin5x5
"Thermite has a HIGH, (white hot) ignition point, thats Waaaayyy to high for electrical ignition, conventional igniters, det cord, mercury fulminate or even explosives to initiate." That is true, but not for nano-composited thermites. The samples of nanothermite that were found in the WTC dust ignite at 430C.
citizenfor911truth1 1 year ago
@Merlin5x5
"Thermite has a HIGH, (white hot) ignition point, thats Waaaayyy to high for electrical ignition, conventional igniters, det cord, mercury fulminate or even explosives to initiate." That is true, but not for nano-composited thermites. The samples of nanothermite that were found in the WTC dust ignite at 430C.
citizenfor911truth1 1 year ago