NH cop killer gets death; I have questions

Sponsor: http://FreeKeene.com - New Hampshire authorities impose first death penalty here in almost 50 years. But here are some questions the mainstream reporters aren't likely to ask. One I didn't think to put in the video: The defendant killed a cop, and his attorney admitted it. But can the murderer of a government employee obtain impartial justice in a trial run by...government employees? This video was edited 12/18/08 and first uploaded 12/18/08

Details:
http://www.boston.com/news/local/new_hampshire/articles/2008/12/18/verdict_re...

If you wish to commission an ad like the one in this video, as of 12/08 the cost is three cents per video view. But views beyond the 1st week are free...your link in the video descrip is free, and the price goes down 30% for orders over $100. Give me a shout through this site, or e-mail me: RidleyReport at... live period com

If you're a Metacafe viewer note that metacafe strips most links from my video descrip when I dupe from youtube.

Additional Keywords: free keene ron paul dave ridley report ridleyreport kelly ayotte attorney general john lynch revolution manchester police new hampshire free state project officer michael briggs firearms guns weapons shooting murder killing michael addison death penalty libertarian don't tase me bro taser tazer paulvill freestaters amnesty international alex jones barry cooper serenity firefly crime spree neighborhood watch communism abuse new media gonzo journalism ayn rand clint eastwood penn and teller jillette human rights watch violence murder prison jail court triall judge cops fair.... Please thank our sponsor by visiting ... FREEKEENE.COM

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• ron
• paul
• free
• state
• project
• manchester
• new
• hampshire
• police
• michael
• addison
• briggs

[RidleyReport]

"IF ADDISON KILLED A CHILD HE WOULD NOT GET THE DEATH PENALTY BC IT IS NOT CAPITAL MURDER."

sounds like we have a problem then

[fczwartek]

Dave,

I think it is wrong to reduce the question of whether someone lives or dies to a simplistic cost-benefit analysis. "Which would be the cheapest solution?"

Personally I'm against the death penalty because I think it is nothing more than state sanctioned vengeance, and it has a long history in this country of being racially biased.

I don't really care if it's more or less expensive than the alternatives.

[RidleyReport]

well since the money is more or less stolen from taxpayers, then less expensive means less theft. That is not a petty matter.

[halsose]

they do more crime

[dewbie42]

Anyone who initiates deadly force against someone should face execution.

(defence of yourself, someone else, your property, or the property of others is not considered initiating).

[ranchai100]

Officer briggs sabed the life of this negro vermin awhile before this vermin murdered him.It just goes to show the negro mentality of non appreciation.Its certainly shown me that if ever a negro needs my help to survive,man woman,child or baby,I won't lift a finger to help them.Because they will just go on to murder someone and I dont want that murder on my concience

[slewofdamascus]

It's not just housing an individual convicted felon anymore, it's the process of selling his potential labor. Prisons have become a business and prisoners are expected to work, it's the cheapest of labor. Clearly, we will see vast abuses in the future as people are incarcerated falsely in order to provide cheap labor. This is how the Chinese operate their penal system, and the Chinese "way of doing" is de riguer for bureaufascists in the english-speaking "west".

[r1dermon]

A special commission studying the state's death penalty laws heard on December 4, 2009 that prosecutors in the Addison case ran up a $1.6 million bill and public defenders spent $1.1 million.

this is before the appeals process. it's infinitely cheaper to house someone for life than to kill them.

[sgtdemanda]

You bleeding hearts make me want to puke. As for this POS that killed the police officer? BURN BABY BURN....how I wish I could be there when they put him down like the animal that he is.

[ragnarush]

and now when you protest pacifically against the governmetn they consider you as a threat for the state and even a terrorist heh ,....c'mon dont you see the damn game folks ? ...

[ragnarush]

and if ever the people of a country revolt and riot, then their government should ask what their people want to change instead of sending police and the army in the extreme case.

they have to much power, the more we make power centers , the more we looose,.....one power center for the whole planet would be INSANE,....it seems stupid but,...watch star wars youll see how the evil takes control of the whole thing

[ragnarush]

if a he kills someone ''actidentally'' the judge are clement with them, why ? again for a reason of state,.... if people can start to point at police and say this one or some of them are killers or corrupted police,...what happen when the nation fear teh police instead of feeling safe with them ? ,...so the judges are clement or the judge order the non-publicy of the affair in some case

and the goverment is suppose to be each of us.

[ragnarush]

i know, in the society we live in , its like that. ... but the fact is Moraly a Police or who ever it is have no higher claim on your life than yourself. For exemple: You have the right to defend yourself, but if yu do you will go in court and prolly gonna go in jail even if it was self-defense, the judge are getting more and more severe on that and they may even make an 'exemplary condamnation' (sry for bad spelling), If a police defend himself as self-defense, does he go in court ? and even

[yamasakiasami]

you have a point but to kill a cop or the presedent per say, is more heavily punishable because of the position of power and the fact the person was killed as a result of thier duties to the state and not a personal matter