Jonathan Cole - 9/11: NEWTON vs NIST - AE911Truth.org

Jonathan Cole pits NIST (National Inst. of Standards and Technology) against Newton in these force filled experiments.

Pre-Order the DVD "9/11 Experts Speak Out" September 1st 2011:
http://www.ae911truth.net/store/product_info.php?products_id=145

Preview the New AE911Truth.org 9/11 Documentary:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIOC1J44RYw

Buy the 9/11 Book "9/11 The Simple Facts":
http://www.ae911truth.net/store/product_info.php?products_id=143

Follow us around the web:
http://www.911ExpertsSpeakOut.org
http://www.ae911truth.org
http://www.facebook.com/ae911truth
http://www.twitter.com/ae911truth
http://www.youtube.com/ae911truth
http://www.flickr.com/ae911truth
https://www.ae911truth.net/store/
http://www.ae911truth.org/911investigator

world trade center conspiracy Investigate 9/11 controlled demolition controlled demolition evidence debunking conspiracy theories debunking the debunkers myths conspiracies remembering 911

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• 9/11
• experiments
• collapse
• NIST
• science
• debunking
• demolition
• newton
• ae911truth
• wtc steel
• Jonathan Cole
• september
• 11th
• conspiracy
• Investigate
• controlled
• conspiracies
• theories
• debunk
• the
• debunkers
• myths
• remembering
• 911

[zakquack]

there's always so many arguments going on on Jonathan Cole's videos... but no one attempts to rebuke the contents of the videos... It's all just ad hom and strawmen...

[dominic150]

@ctcole77 I have not misquoted the FEMA report. Its in there. fire = low probability. As for the firefighters, why do you think they started "Firefighters for 9/11 truth". Some of them saw flashes and heard bomb like sounds inside of WTC1,2,7. Media reports of explosions in WTC1,2,7 came from firefighters. They did not fight the fires in wtc7 because they were more worried about finding survivors. However, when talking about fires inside a building, they dont stay burning in one spot. they move.

[dominic150]

@ctcole77 lol, they did not collapse. they had to bring demo teams into bring down the remaing structure. What was left, after the towers fell on them, was still standing. Excuse me, the FEMA report, not commission, "the best hypothesis for a fire-fed building collapse has only a low probability of occurrence." Yet, you say" raging inferno". So you know more than the investigators at FEMA? You should apply for a job there. Not every building, but WTC7 does need investigated.

[ctcole77]

@dominic150

"raging inferno" is not slight Mr. Science. And 911 twoofer very carefully only show you one side of WTC 7.

The commission report didnt even mention WTC 7. So we both know how much you actually read of it.

20 buildings were damaged on 911. Did we really need to investigate each one?

NIST released a study on WTC 7 in Aug. of 2008. You might want to read it before you open your piehole.

WTC 3,4,5, & 6 collapased when WTC 1 & 2 did.

DO SOME RESEARCH.

911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN

[dominic150]

@ctcole77 Yes, i have seen the damage to WTC7. It is slight when compared to WTC 4,5,6. But WTC 4,5,6 all remained standing. Even the commission report said "it is not known how the fires caused the collapse". UL will not release its computer model and thier floor models did not fail. Please explain to me how WTC4,5,6 all continued to stand after the towers fell on them, yet WTC7 fell. Remember, there were fires inside 4,5,6 also.

[ctcole77]

@dominic150

This isn't a game show. There's no need to phrase your "answers" in the form of a questions.

I suppose thousands of tons of concrete and steel falling hundreds of feet on WTC 7had NOTHING to do with the collapse?

How about the 30 foot hole in WTC 7's facade?

How about the southwest corner of WTC chopped off?

Please explain firefighters predicting WTC 7's collapse HOURS ahead?

NOW, PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTIONS.

911 TRUTH = 911 LIES

[dominic150]

@ctcole77 How did WTC7 fall when no plane hit it and it was, at best, slightly damaged by falling debris. WTC 4,5,6 sustained heavy damage as they were directly beneath the towers and yet they still stood. Fire, according to the "Official Story", has only a very low probability of occurance. Fire can not cause uniform collapse. If it could, no one would need a demolition team. Also, why have building codes not been changed? If they think fire can cause collapse, they would change code.

[kensei85]

ignore the no planer trolls

[k2477456]

if no planes wwere used then where did 4 Boeing 767's go? what happened to the 266 people on them

[ctcole77]

@JZJYRWO

LMAO! This makes absolutely no sense. In physics, nothing is "implied", it's calculated. How about providing some equations and calculations that support your example?

AGAIN, What SPECIFIC Newton law proves no planes were used? Feel free to list the law with equations and calculations.

Why do you loons like avoiding questions soooo much?

911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN