William Lane Craig At His Finest

Having some fun with ol' Bill

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• William
• Lane
• Craig
• WLC
• Dishonest
• Absurd
• Atheist
• Theism
• Argument
• Kalam
• Morality
• Fallacy
• God
• Objective
• Debate

[01ross10]

@frog1599 No I reserve my best argument for those that I think are open minded enough to maybe have their views changed, to anyone else I curse their name.

Glad I could clear that up for you.

[frog1599]

@01ross10 Wow, your best argument is just simply cursing his name?

[agnostaxian]

Just another silly piece by a member of the utube atheist dufus possey

[01ross10]

@01ross10

And before you do why don't you remove your childish, rebellious avatar so that people MIGHT take you seriously. You dumb fuck christian sperm bin.

[01ross10]

@01ross10

Go and learn something child, something that hasn't been force feed down your throat like a catholic priests "love"

[01ross10]

@01ross10

Christopher doesn't even attempt to combat WLC's pov because he doesn't need to.

WLC is an imbecile who doesn't even realise that ontological arguments doesn't prove anything at all in the real world. In fact the whole way of presenting this pov was constructed because there was no other rational way to "prove" the existence of not only the christian god but anything like it! TBC

[01ross10]

@ChestonORChezszun

Oh dear, your a bit out of your depth. Do you even understand what an "Ontological argument" is?

There are so many ways to respond to you that completely ruin "Dr" William Lane Craig's point of view (and by proxy....yours) that even someone of my intellect doesn't know where to start. TBC

[bujumbura101]

THE FIRST QUESTION IS " DO YOU DERIVE A FINANCIAL BENEFIT FROM GOD SIGNING " AND IF YOU DO SIR YOUR COVER IS BLOWN AND WE MUST ALL AGREE

THAT YOUR CASE IS VOID OF MERIT AND IS A MERE WAFFLING OF NONSENSE.

FULL OF SOUND AND FURY SIGNIFYING NOTHING . IT IS A STORY TOLD BY AN IDIOT .

[ChestonORChezszun]

@01ross10 HA! What debates were you watching! Hitchens avoided most of Craig's arguments! That is a bold faced lie or a mere delusion. I must hear the counter points to Craig's 5 arguments. If you can't supply them, then they must not exist. So, go back and watch the Hitchens debate and this time LISTEN. Hitchens only addresses 2 or 3 of his points. If you think otherwise, prove it. Tell me what his counter points were.

[estuchedepeluche]

@manyjessica1 Thanks for noticing my comment, I am actually quoting him, those are the words Dr Lane Craig uses when critiquing the character and intellect of people who don't agree with him, rather that refuting their arguments. BTW I am well aware of his credentials and publications, and also I attended the debate his sustained with evolution biologist Jose Francisco Ayala @ IU Bloomington. Though his style is impressive and dramatic, I was very underwhelmed by his arguments.