A dusty old YEC argument backfires (part 1)

-Part 1-
From Petterson to Peucker-Ehrenbrink & Ravizza and why ultimatly this 'young earth evidence' actually falsifies the young earth hypothesis and strengthens the 'old earth hypothesis/fact'.


References:
[1]Morris, Henry, 1974. Scientific Creationism, California, Creation- Life Publishers. 217 pp. p: 152, ISBN 0-89051-001-6
[2] http://www.truthandscience.net/theageoftheearth.htm (under point Q.)
[3] Spudis, P.D. (2004). "Moon". World Book Online Reference Center, NASA.
[4] Barkers, J.L. and Anders, E. 1968. Accretion rate of cosmic matter from Iridium and Osmium contents of of deep-sea sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 32, pp. 627-645.
[5] Ganapathy, R. 1983. The Tunguska explosion of 1908: discovery of meteoritic debris near the explosion site and at the south pole. Science 220, pp. 1158-1161.
[6] Love, S. G., and D. E. Brownlee, 1993. A direct measurement of the terrestrial mass accretion rate of cosmic dust, Science 262, pp. 550-553.
[7] Kortenkamp, S.J., and Dermott, S.F., 1998. Accretion of Interplanetary Dust Particles by the Earth, Icarus 135, pp. 469-495.
[8] Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B. and Ravizza, G. 2000. The effects of sampling artifacts on cosmic dust flux estimates: a reevaluation of nonvolatile tracers (Os, Ir), Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 64, pp. 1965-1970.
[9] Snelling, A.A. & Rush, D.E. 1993. Moon Dust and the Age of the Solar System. Creation Ex Nihilo Technical Journal 7(1) p. 2-42.
Link: http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v7/i1/moondust.asp
[10] Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B. 1996. Accretion of extraterrestrial matter during the last 80 million years and its effect on the marine osmium isotope record, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 60 pp. 3187-3196. This quote: p. 3193.


Further readings:

...

Cheers,
Terrence

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Astronomy
• radiometric
• dating
• young
• old
• earth
• YEC
• creationism
• IDP
• Dust
• Earth
• Moon
• Geology
• Flood

[jcrebel18]

AiG already said not to use this argument, so Idk why you'd need to address it.

But I guess it's ok.

[Terrencje]

When you watch part 2 I adressed just that point. However in many fora I still come across this argument.

Thanx for the feedback :)

[eeyoreofborg]

Why are you posting text on a movie site. Go back to HTML where you belong...dingus.

[Kabitu1]

...........

.....

since when is 6000 equal to one-sixth of 10,000?

These people doesnt even have their basic math right.

[neilan15]

11/10 not only do you have solid arguments, but you list youyr references \o/\o/\o/\o/ VenomfangX should be taking notes lol

[SpeakerForrTheDead]

Flawless!

Absolutely FLAWLESS!!