Evidence of an explosion before the first plane hits the Twin Towers

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
26,656
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 29, 2010

WNYW TV reporters and camera which has picked up a ground vibration from an explosion before the first plane hits the North Tower.

The original is here-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVEmAWaKoYQ

Christopher Bollyn was the first to point out in his Open Letter) evidence for massive explosions was captured by a seismograph located 34 km from the WTC-

http://www.serendipity.li/wtc5.htm

The evidence is now compelling — the twin towers were BLOWN off their feet. The plane crashes and fires were but secondary distractions to the main event.

The towers were literally "blasted" off their footings at the beginning, and during the first phase, of their respective collapses.

The fact that the towers were seen "jumping" immediately before the collapse is documented on film by a helicopter camera that witnessed that event.

Massive explosions deep in the basements of the WTC towers clearly lifted — and dropped — the massive structures from their bases 70 feet below the surface.

The basement explosions that detached the central support columns from the bedrock, and dropped the towers, left extremely hot pools of molten steel (1535+ degrees Celsius), which persisted for days in the lowest basements (-7 level), and clear seismic tracks — that have yet to be explained.

However, the seismic evidence is quite clear: There were massive (and unexplained) releases of energy causing 2.1 and 2.3 magnitude earthquakes before ANY debris even hit the ground.

Furthermore, seismologists agree that the falling rubble would only cause minimal seismic disturbances, which is what the seismic record clearly shows it did (e.g., Columbia University's Arthur Lerner-Lam's reports).

As a matter of fact the impact of the "rubble" (we can no longer speak of large pieces) caused only relatively minor seismic shock wave signatures compared to what ROCKED the EARTH (2.1 and 2.3 [local magnitude] earthquakes) at the towers' base from the beginning of the collapse until about 5 seconds into the 8- and 10-second collapses.

The massive seismic wave "spike", which occurred at about 4-5 seconds into the 8-second collapse of the North Tower was MANY times larger than the waves that marked the moment of impact when the "rubble" finally hit the ground.

http://www.serendipity.li/wot/bollyn_open_letter.htm

Great video clip from 911allcausticcamera's channel where there are lots on new 9/11 videos-
http://www.youtube.com/user/911allcausticcamera

  • likes, 22 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @loosechangeexposed ".....the vibration from the engines would crack the aluminum wings, and the landing gear would rip through the wings upon landing....."

    ...... if you admit that mere vibrations and rubber tires can crack aluminum wings....then you must agree that a wall of steel girders and concrete...would crumple an aluminum wing like a beer can against a frat boy's forehead...!!!

  • @loosechangeexposed ......I understand you're better at making personal verbal attacks....than you are at presenting sound arguments in regards to physics...

    ....but you still didn't have to drag santa into this...

    

see all

All Comments (207)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nice Shoes.

  • @Diego19827 If you say the first shake and the first sound came from the plane, it means the plane would have been faster than sound (which it obviously wasn't). Either way, there were bombs, no matter who put them there...

  • Sound travels slower than movement, So when the ground shakes, that is the moment of impact, the the sound of the explosion comes after the actual impact.

    I still think it is a conspiracy though

  • uhhh ive seen the original and this is actually a rare angle and audio of the first tower hit.

  • This isn't evidence of anything except that sound waves travel slower than light, AND that they used some type of modern scalar missile. The sound is nothing like a jet. Listen to cruise missile attack sounds vs. jet engine sounds and you'll see you have something here nonetheless.

  • That's from the sound from the jet dumb ass...the engine made the ground shake cuz it is so close u fuck

  • I HAVE NO OPINION ON THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY WHETHER ITS TRUE OR NOT.... IT IS A HILARIOUS ASSUMPTION TO SAY THAT A SLIGHT MALFUNCTION IN A CAMERA POINTED AT SOME GUYS SHOES IS THE RESULT OF A BOMB....HOW ABOUT ITS THE RESULT OF SOMEONE ACCIDENTALLY BUMPING INTO IT, WHILE THEY SWIFTLY LOOK UP TO SEE WHAT THAT LOUD NOISE IS....IF YOU INTEND TO PRESENT 9/11 AS AN INSIDE JOB, YOU OUGHT TO PRESENT YOUR CASE IN A MUCH MORE RATIONAL MANNER THAN THIS

  • @firecloud77 - think i concur on this 1 - should have noticed 2x shocks (1x for explosion & 1x for plane crash) if indeed there was an explosion just then. Though does anybody know of the timing of the 'explosions' in the Basement (near the Elevators - where things can fall great heights from above) given in other peoples testimony ?

  • @firecloud77 you sound wild mr.scientist, because the witnessed said when they got outside then the top floors exploded (first plane hit) which they did not see the first plane hit, just saw the explosion.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more