"If a disciple feels that their Guru is not inspiring them or is unqualified, then the bond of Guru - disciple is automatically broken"
The real Guru/disciple relationship was never made in the first place,then how can it be broken ? if it never existed.It is not re initiation but the start of the process of initiation or entering the school of bhakti.This has been well explained by Srila Sridhar Maharaj in His book called heart and halo.Thx for this posting it was the 1st time I met my Gurudev
@stageofsilence I see you are posting here as well you coward. How about responding to one of my comments with something sensible. The "Gurus" that are still alive are obviously not inspiring the disciples. So naturally the disciples are looking elsewhere. If a disciple feels that their Guru is not inspiring them or is unqualified, then the bond of Guru - disciple is automatically broken.
ISKCON does not know what to do whenever their members come across a sad guru with real charisma. Of course sooner or later people would feel attracted to Srila Narayana Maharaj's Krsna Katha. Many of the ISKCON gurus approached Srila Narayana M for guidance. They took shelter. He very naturally became their siksa guru. But the big cats of the institution did not like that. They felt exposed by not being able to play the pretend game of knowing what they did not know: Real Bhakti.
I know personally people they are reinitiated by Narayana Maharaja although their Gurus are still alive and initiated Gurus. How is this possible in the vaisnavatradition?
"If a disciple feels that their Guru is not inspiring them or is unqualified, then the bond of Guru - disciple is automatically broken"
The real Guru/disciple relationship was never made in the first place,then how can it be broken ? if it never existed.It is not re initiation but the start of the process of initiation or entering the school of bhakti.This has been well explained by Srila Sridhar Maharaj in His book called heart and halo.Thx for this posting it was the 1st time I met my Gurudev
dinanath1008 4 months ago
@stageofsilence I see you are posting here as well you coward. How about responding to one of my comments with something sensible. The "Gurus" that are still alive are obviously not inspiring the disciples. So naturally the disciples are looking elsewhere. If a disciple feels that their Guru is not inspiring them or is unqualified, then the bond of Guru - disciple is automatically broken.
radhacharan 1 year ago
ISKCON does not know what to do whenever their members come across a sad guru with real charisma. Of course sooner or later people would feel attracted to Srila Narayana Maharaj's Krsna Katha. Many of the ISKCON gurus approached Srila Narayana M for guidance. They took shelter. He very naturally became their siksa guru. But the big cats of the institution did not like that. They felt exposed by not being able to play the pretend game of knowing what they did not know: Real Bhakti.
dpbrazil 1 year ago
I know personally people they are reinitiated by Narayana Maharaja although their Gurus are still alive and initiated Gurus. How is this possible in the vaisnavatradition?
stageofsilence 1 year ago
wow
sstandon 1 year ago
@stokaji lol as aposed to the ones who managed to take over it
krish108 1 year ago
Must have been before they realised that Narayan Maharaj was planning to take over ISKCON.
stokaji 1 year ago
in 90 BB Govinda Swami was not yet Sanyasi.
MrJason1108 1 year ago
@harirasadas
90-th
Vovan108 1 year ago
90th
Vovan108 1 year ago