Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Richard Dawkins PWNZ mrchekky

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,679
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 14, 2008

Calling someone a dickhead is not the best way to start a rational debate.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 10 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (celsius233)

  • As you look through the eyes of macro evolution there is no direct connections of each catagory in simple reality and part of survival is being also able to adapt and i do accept changes. I strongly doupt that any other living thing than us will ever evolve into a more complex form. I do understand in simplest forms that evolution seems right when you cancel out god. but imagine god was eventually canceled out social darwanism will have to kick in eventually.

  • @Danielfallz Why do god and evolution have to be mutually exclusive in your mind? It's perfectly possible to accept evolution and hold a belief in God at the same time.

  • I beleive that every species has a specific part in life and they are what they are for the role. Yes we all have something in common it can be visually or under the telescope but that is part of law to be able to live in existance. I call it design but you would say we are all decendants from a common ancestor which currently stands unidentified and is very complex. no other creature can be as complex as us as we are dependant of them to survive

  • @Danielfallz complexity increases over time. Modern single-celled organisms are much more complex that the first forms of life would have been because they have been evolving the longest.

  • Its not hard for a scientist to come up with a diagram of how the eye came about in theory. but the link between the eye to recieve infomation, the optical to the brain is impossible to come in existance through the eyes of natural selection.

  • @Danielfallz I think what you're trying to say is that there doesn't seem to be a process by which the optical nerve (which connects the eye to the brain) could have evolved. You are wrong. The video explained that it started with a simple patch on the skin. All of your skin is connected to your brain, that's how you feel. Seeing is nothing more than "feeling" light particles/waves.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Richard Dawkins PWNZ Kent Hovind
see all

All Comments (183)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Danielfallz such as....?

  • @celsius233 that is not true. discoveries through the bible have been very accurate where archealogists seek guidance through.

  • @stepharnos115 So, christianity is a religion. And in your own words: "religion is a very bad thing, history has proven this".

    ....ok

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more