9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV!

Have you ever played physics games, like any Burnout games, Little Big Planet, Armadillo Run or whatever...?

1. Planes are made of light materials like aluminum and fiberglass. Think of them as long beer cans. Even birds can give planes problems.
(If you don't believe me, see the video "9/11 Fake: Aluminum, Fiberglass & Birds".)

2. There were many steel core columns supporting both of the Twin Towers. No plane could enter such a structure without being completely destroyed.

3. Two planes were depicted as being inside and intact the Twin Towers, a pair of buildings made with 200,000 tons of steel each.

4. Eyewitnesses: Very few people in New York's business district actually had a decent view of the South Tower of the WTC. Only a few thousand people at most would have been able to see the South Tower explode. The author of this website has interviewed people who do not believe that they saw a plane strike the South Tower.

Meanwhile, it was a simple matter for the TV networks to keep the eyewitnesses who didn't see a plane off the air.

5. Both Boeing 767s (i.e., Flights 11 and 175, which supposedly struck the North and South Towers respectively) have 165 foot wingspans. Meanwhile, both the North and South Towers were 210 feet wide. We're supposed to believe that both planes were entirely inside the tower they hit, with no pieces showing, with only 45 feet of room to spare!

6. United Airlines Flight 175 was shown entering the South Tower like a ghost. When the tip of the plane's fuselage hits the steel exterior of the South Tower the fuselage should be breaking up. That would cause the wings to break off.

7. Newton's Third Law of Motion states that "To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.". Let's apply Newton's Third Law to Flight 175. In the 9/11/01 story, Flight 175 strikes the the South Tower at 450 m.p.h.

Now imagine that the South Tower moved at 450 m.p.h. and struck a stationary Flight 175. We would not expect that Flight 175 would be undamaged. We would not expect that it would simply disappear into the South Tower.

8. There was no audio of 'Flight 175' striking the South Tower. This is true even though there were about a dozen videos of the event said to be obtained from lucky amateurs.

9. There are innumerable contradictions with the news reports of planes striking the WTC. (The author's writing is here.) Just a cursory examination of the 911 news reports can reveal dramatic inconsistencies.

10. There has been massive censorship of the 911 Hoax. Dozens of media sources have exercized a zero tolerance policy for any suggestion that no planes struck the WTC before it was vaporized from exotic weaponry and nuclear weapons.

Why would CBS, The New York Times, The History Channel, Indmedia.org and YouTube.com be censoring the idea so aggressively if real planes hit the Twin Towers?

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• nwo
• old
• new
• world
• order
• age
• illuminati
• 9/11
• 911
• basic
• crash
• physics
• wtc
• twin
• towers
• newton
• law
• thermodynamic
• tv
• fakery
• fake
• no
• plane
• fiberglass
• aluminum
• missile
• media
• mind
• control
• lies
• truth
• propaganda
• digital
• image
• video
• pentagon
• strike
• cgi
• false
• clues
• manipulation
• brainwash
• nlp
• ww3
• hoax
• scam
• exposed
• bush
• obama
• repetition
• psy-op
• black-op
• controlled
• opposition
• movement

[voodoowichdoctor]

@chandler687 what happened to the flight recorders?

you didn't see a plane hit building 7

[griz669]

whoever made this video should kill themselves

[chandler687]

i was there i seen the plane hit the towers no jack ass can tell me that what i saw inperson on the ground in nyc didnt happen i watched the panes hit and they went right into the building

so if this didnt happen by planes then smartass what did it a ufo from affganastan god you people are so fuck in the head for beleving this crap

[bobzilla441]

@leom760442 That's the stupidest thing i've ever heard...

[leom760442]

true government killing it own people for their own intrest

[voodoowichdoctor]

tower. or the rear part of the fuselage and tail would have been dangling out of the hole.

why where the flight recorders not recovered? these are designed to survive a fire.

[voodoowichdoctor]

shaped hole which is not even plane shaped, it did not allow the huge tailfin to pass through.if a plane flew into the tower the aluminium skin wings could not slice through the steel on the wall of the tower. the story is impossible. the plane is 160 ft long, the tower was just over 200 ft wide. in the centre of the tower is the support column of 47 steel beams set in concrete. this means if the plane did pass through the wall it would have to demolish this to disappear completely inside the

[voodoowichdoctor]

@masterl00bz117 there is a witness on fox news (owned by zionist rupert murdoch) who has been identified as an actor, mark humphrey- false witness.

so, of these 1000s, why is there only 1 video and no other photos? the naudet video, which was STAGED and not shown on tv until the next day which allowed time for a cgi plane to be added.

download this-

3w(dot)911foreknowledge(dot)co­m(stroke)staged(dot)htm

pictures of the north tower taken a few minutes after the hit/explosion show a plane

[masterl00bz117]

@corvette35000 jennifer oberstein is a no body. she wasn't the ONLY person in new york that was on the street and heard a loud boom. there are thousands of other testimonials and there is even a video of the plane hitting the north tower.

[voodoowichdoctor]

@Corvette35000 north tower- no plane witness Jennifer Oberstein