M134 minigun and M240 CPMG comparison
Top Comments
All Comments (59)
-
Thats a lot of ammo waisted on hitting such a huge target! Might as well drop a nuke Just to kill a hamster!
-
There is only one reason for a video like this to exist and that is fear. People are starting to ask if the terminator gun is worth the investment and the factories response boils down to 'well you didn't need that extra ammo anyway'
-
Plus, minigun practically doesn't have recoil.
-
M134- overkill when you need it
-
m240 is good for suporting fire and ambushes but the minigun is just awesome and in every case.
-
:0............1:23 let's look at that again.
-
but it m240 made the kill can only cost about $9.00 (.75 per round). the mini cost $82.5 (110x$.75) to kill the same target.
-
you cannot compare these 2 weapons, any weapon with a gatlin mechanism can not be carried in the way that the m240b or the m249, as a Squad Atuomatic Weapon. the 249 is a piece of shit. the 240b is one of the best weapon systems i have ever used. Yes the gatlin can shoot faster and you don't have to change out the barrels but you have to mount a gatlin which limits your options on the battlefield especially when ambusing, not to mention you need batteries to spin the gun up.
-
anyone think a 556 minigun could be converted to 6.8x45mm? its supposed to be almost identical to the 6.8 spc but its based on the 556 just with a larger grain bullet... so the only thing on most weapons that needs to be changes to switch calibres is the barrel... as far as ive heard anyway.
M134, When you just absoluty must kill everything!
GTFORDMAN 3 years ago 9
Agree wt. ppk45 and others. Cost efficiency matters. AK47 made its mark in history but is still very much lowtech. Military forces may evolve into such expensive hightech that they literaly paint themselves out of history. The trick is to combine hightech and cost efficiency and then keep the expensive hightech weaponry for those critical situations where they are really needed.
poulha 1 year ago 2