Highlights: 2012 Women's Final

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
81,510
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 28, 2012

Two of the most aggressive, stylish players in the world went head to head not only for the Australian Open title, but for the World Number One spot. Vika Azarenka took the win 63 60 and this is the (brief) story of the match.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • This final took less than an hour and a half, while Djokovic vs Nadal took nearly six hours. Yet the prize money is the same. Sharapova got the same reward for winning only three games and capitulating meekly as Nadal got for winning 25 games (plus a tie-break) and producing, in my opinion, the greatest Grand Slam final since Wimbledon 2008. That can't be right. I wouldn't want uneven prize money, so isn't it about time women started playing five sets?

  • OMG this girls are so annoying screaming all the time

see all

All Comments (92)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • So these two bitches get the same money as Nadal and Novak?

  • arrogant, annoying, pathetic bitch. i hate Victoria with a passion after this. that smug look on her face after she broke Sharapova at 4-0 makes me want to scream! she's not as good as she thinks she is and she's gonna get her ass handed to her on a plate next time she plays Maria

  • In women's tennis, winning a grand slam is nothing special, the same best of 3 sets. the only difference with a masters is that you have to play an extra round, which they often win 6-0, 6-2 or something like that, grand slams in women's tennis should be at least best of 5 sets in the final to be worth so many points for accomplishing almost the same thing,

  • fuck, i want serena williams to pick herself together from the feet disease and mental issue and slam all these girls and back to number one

  • @Viropol Shush, it´s politically incorrect to point out these facts. Another point is that women´s tennis is far from the standards of men´s tennis, considering individual skill and the entertaining quality of matches.

  • I think only the best women are capable of playing best of 5. Therefore...the best solution without having unequal amount of prize money..is to make ONLY the women's final..a best of 5.

  • Maria should pay $20 million to the tournament organizers for this utterly embarrassing performance.

  • Why whould people want to see this and actually pay for this crap?

  • @AsuraNOikari The quality of the game is already down. It doesn't matter how long they play. WTA tennis has no variety. None.

  • Sorry, but there is nothing "stylish" about these two players. The screaming and moaning needs to be stopped.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more