GIMilsim 50 vs. 68 Caliber Accuracy Test with MCBtv
Uploader Comments (painthappy)
Top Comments
-
lmao i like the mythbusters impression
-
.50 cal still needs to be improved and perfected... just as .68 cal is very improved over what it used to be im sure.
All Comments (63)
-
lol mythbusters
-
was the velocity the same of even as in the amount of co2 was being dispensed evenly between guns and 1 gun wasnt shooting harder
-
The only thing I cant stand about 50 cal. Paint is that it makes the pain better for noobs cuz all they do is camp and they are a burden for the team so if the pain is unbearable maybe they won't come back come on guys u know u hate noobs
-
Virgins
-
2:34 you got a good beat going there ;)
-
u cant shoot worth shit
-
This test was so useless, build your own test gun. at 75 feet the results will be. The same.
it's like comparing a .22 to a 30-06 at 25 yards. different size bullets, different energy's, but there's little difference between the barrels, In theory, .50 cal should be very close to .68 if they have the same amount of energy, at least at 75 feet. at 200 feet things may start to change. sorry to discredit your video. but aside from building your own gun, there really is no accurate way to test this
Why did you ignore the extreme outlier for the .68 caliber in both calculations. One shot clearly clip the left edge of the cardboard and leave a small mark. Paint can't fly 90 degrees across a target and then curve around you know. Watch the mark appear at 3:09 with no corresponding mark or hole on the cardboard.
snypre 11 months ago
@snypre we dropped off the extreme outlier on both the .68 and the .50
all the data can be found at MCB under the 50tech section
It's a way to basically drop the paint due to a dimple, bad fill, or who knows.
painthappy 11 months ago
@snypre
I just watched the video and we even state what we did at 4:34 on the video. Check it out in case you didn't watch the whole thing.
painthappy 11 months ago
how the hell can you compare a gun from the early 2000's and a gun 2009?
pitatv 1 year ago
@pitatv
I know, especially when the gun from the early 2000's performed better. Technology sure has gone down hill. Or maybe it's just the new gun? You decide which.
painthappy 1 year ago
so what happens if im in a close range battle and my .50 balls dont break on my victum? he technically doesnt have to call him self shot? so will the 50's travel further or will the 68's? i got what u ment by the breaking point, but it just doesnt seem an appropriate test for lenght, especially for woods, and any kind of winds, it seems the heavier will travel a more unaffective path than a lighter ball. but i would definately love to be able to prepare my sp-1 for .50's and back again
DJBRIEF 2 years ago
In short:
The .68 will travel further than the .50
The .68 will break further out than the .50
The .50 is more effected by the wind than .68
The .50 breaks are small, and even when they do break, most of them look like splatter and not hits.
I can only see .50 caliber working for the new player market at best, or indoor facilities.
painthappy 2 years ago