Alex welcomes back to the show Lord Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, British politician, business consultant, policy adviser, writer, columnist, inventor and adviser to Margaret Thatcher's policy unit in the 1980s. Monckton is a vociferous critic of the climate scam gang. He reports from the summit.
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/
.
http://www.infowars.com/
Monckton is a fraud and Alex Jones is a crackpot.
synsei1 5 months ago
id just like to say that i do not appreciate my comments being used as they have been, im a scientist, not a conspiracy theorist, having not understood what a "linked comment" was and googleing it i found my comments from here copied and pasted to other sites, without the original context.
"obamaantichrist (dot) org" can fuck off.
i dont mind people using my words but at least use fucking context.
i do not endorse this site, i only posted here coz i was bored and lookin at "alternative ideas"
FreeTheRadical 10 months ago
Lord Monckton's visit to Australia and appearance on the Alan Jones' radio show on Radio 2GB, I believe, helped to awaken many of the Australian people about this Global Warming scam. This was a big deal as Alan Jones' radio show is as mainstream as you can get but surprisingly has a huge following.
Subsequently, with Alan Jones' support Monckton appeared at several public events, giving lectures on the global warming scam. Well done to both of them as well as Alex.
felixq78 11 months ago
i hate lord mockton, his voice is so annoying, and he is a coward saying in an interview that he wouldn't name call against the elites.... the elites are raping us in ever way and your worrying about name calling come on, ever day the elite throw dirt all over truthers names calling them crazy, loons etc
stopbeingcowards 11 months ago
@TheGamanic We worked as the scientific policy advisor for Margaret Thatcher, what are you talking about?
Applest2oApples 11 months ago
Why does it say that Monckton is a politician yet he is not a member of the House of Lords or Commons and has never worked as a policy advisor for any government?
TheGamanic 1 year ago
@FreeTheRadical Hey FTR just read your comment thanks for the info, it's sounds "great" to me also. just checked wiki seems it's more complicated than the normal system, but should be utilised more, pity that something has to have the power to destroy in order to get public backing, this of course is not surprising.
IMOM1 1 year ago
@IMOM1 last point, and most importantly, thorium reactors should be able to greatly REDUCE the total amount of waste so even if they are flawed they can at least be used to dispose of existing nuclear waste. so even if they didnt even make any energy they could become the new "recycle bin" for nuclear waste, but they DO produce energy!
closing statement;
LFTR seems absolutely great to me!
FreeTheRadical 1 year ago
@IMOM1 ...all in all it seems as good as i originally thought. the counter claims seem to come from existing nuclear industries which want to defend thier reactors, which can produce nuclear weapon fuel, seems the powers that be only backed them to begin with coz it was during the cold war and it was a cheap method of making weapon material, now they are loosing the funding they are trying to fight back (verbally), or so it would seem.
FreeTheRadical 1 year ago
@IMOM1 hey, sorry for the delay (for onlookers we communicated via "personal messages") anyhoo ive finaly got round to looking up thorium reactors, it looks like (mostly wikipedia) that the "LFTR" (pronounced lifter, liquid flouride thorium reactor) is able to produce energy from thorium, cannot produce weapon material, can use "light water reactor" waste for energy (destroying much of the waste that exists) and produces very little waste itself. the counter claims seem rather weak...
FreeTheRadical 1 year ago