Objective Morality vs. Christianity

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
48,292
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 29, 2011

I don't think that arguing against objective morality, or arguing FOR it but towards a naturalistic source, are the only options. Take a look at what happens when we (even hypothetically) concede that it has a theistic basis! It certainly doesn't do Christianity any favors.

SCRIPT IS AT http://www.nonstampcollector.com/morality
OTHERS at http://www.nonstampcollector.com/main

Why couldn't an objective morality simply make sense? Why does looking at morality through the lens of Christianity make such LITTLE sense? Well, it's obvious why - Christianity and its god is nonsense. There could be no clearer sign that Christianity is a man-made bunch of bollocks, than to look at its claims on objective morality. All these special pleadings about context and new vs old covenants are the dying gasps of a belief system that before long won't have anyone even TRYING to make it make sense. You'd be better off trying to argue that Joseph Fritzl is the greatest father that the world has ever known (within a certain context).

Look elsewhere for an objective moral law giver, other than Christianity, for the god that you are convinced must exist. It can't hurt - and the bible has caused enough problems on this planet, with its contradictory and wicked claims and commands. Don't support, or give cover, to those who want us to base our modern societies around that absurd mess of a book. Be honest with yourself, and reject it, as people do who take a real, open, honest look at what it says. It isn't divine, it is appallingly man-made. Man-made as in MALE-made, too, quite obviously.

The graphics in this are taken from around the web, I don't claim copyright on any of them and this video is not being used by me to collect any revenue, and is being posted under a Creative Commons license, whatever that means.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • love listening to videos like this while working lol, very entertaining.

  • Anyone who defends yahweh has to be an apologetic. I apologize for god commanding the stoning of people, I apologize for god commanding the killing of children. I apologize... (the list goes on)

    I am going to exercise my Human Apologetics - somebody has to apologize for ignoramuses like William Lane Craig.

see all

All Comments (1,439)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nonstamp, what if a Christian psychopath told you that Christianity isn't about love, old testament rules still apply, and they'll do any cruel acts you mentioned in the Bible, but only fail to because of their fear of man? Would they at least earn consistency points?

  • Beautifuly reasoned.

  • I agree very much! Best video i have ever seen. Great job nonstamp

  • This might be the best video I have ever seen.

  • Everytime i hear WLC say "objective" i vomit a little in my mouth.

  • Gj np

  • WLG is one of the most horrible people in our lifetime.

  • @Collidedatoms

    So you're saying that by ascribing the concept holy to a god idea, anything can be excused?

    The Hebrew and christian bibles are very explicit: many acts are punished with death by torture.

    Death by torture is no longer considered moral in the west. It is considered immoral and illegal.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more