Short Speech By The Great "Dr. Mohammad Mossadeq" ..

I would like to thank all those individuals, websites who provided the Photos and Audio for this Video ..

(If You Like This Video, Please share It with Others) ..

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Speech
• Mossadeq
• Mossadegh
• Iran
• Prime
• Minister
• Tehran
• Shah
• Coup
• 53
• UN
• Security
• Council
• Hague
• SAVAK
• Oil
• Britain
• US
• Embassy

[Secular1000]

Peace be upon you, Mohammad Mossadeq.

[mselinuk]

درود بر این مرد بزرگ,I am proud of being an Iranian

[aburgheim]

SUBS PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!

[RFinkle2]

Would be nice to have some subs...

[nimavahedi14]

long live mossadegh, screw western countries

[vaglordupa]

@Eagle0vs0Oghab I agree but Persia (or Parsia) is not 7000 years old. Unless you yesterday found some proof. Atleast 3000-3500 years old.

[payambreaker]

@taxibandit13

Same here, I also enjoyed it. At the end of the day whether west puppet or not, He did every thing in his power to modernize Iran. The only mistake he made was that he loved Iran too much and as you know ayatollahs are against that. For that we call him the father of modern Iran. I wish I could speak like this to our fellow Iranians who are against Shah.Unfortunately people have very small capacity these days and soon start insulting one another. Thank you and Take care.

[taxibandit13]

@payambreaker While I disagree that all your facts are correct, I understand and respect your opinion. You're right, we come from different backgrounds on the other side of the planet, but the world gets smaller every day and people like us will only come into contact more and more in the future. I have enjoyed this debate and I hope you have a wonderful day!

[taxibandit13]

@payambreaker Unfortunately it is very well documented by more than just the U.S. that the Shah was indeed a puppet of the western powers. I do believe he cared about his country very much, and wanted to see Iran become a great, modern nation, but believed the best way to do it was to go along with what Britain and the USA wanted. And he did try to make it more secular, which triggered a muslim backlash.

[taxibandit13]

@payambreaker Also, the CIA doesn't always fight for the right causes, but discounting information just because it came from them can be ignorant. Especially when they have no reason to make it up. They would have much preferred if the Shah was more willing to stand up and take power himself, but instead they nearly had to force him to do it.

[taxibandit13]

@payambreaker As for Wikileaks, it did expose many secrets but also proved that the U.S. was handling politics as it should, and being much more fair than many of our allies. The king of Saudi Arabia for example tried to pressure the U.S. to go to war with Iran, but Bush and Obama wouldn't do it.

[payambreaker]

@taxibandit13

Well you are from different background and don't have to necessarily understand the reasons behind my interest and preference of a Monarchy for Iran. we have 2500 years history of monarchy, Iran's dignity is maintained only this way. A republic state is not a suitable for of state for a country like Iran with such history.

BTW, do not portrait Shah as a USA agent. After all it was USA who caused this catastrophe. Carter could not tolerate a rich Iran. Shah stood against USA.