theowarner's disturbing obsession with William Lane Craig

theowarner has an unhealthy and disturbing obsession on William Lane Craig. One wonders if this loser even has a life! Often he gives rather shallow and unsophisticated critiques of Dr. Craig. Anyway, in yet another lie by him, and after encouraging more non-Christians to be as dishonest as he is, he claims that Craig's supporters on youtube were unable to refute videos made by theowarner on Dr. Craig. Of course this is a lie:

Theowarner Playlist: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=1C47FD9499BC3529

theowarner thinks you can defend something you know NOTHING about : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0opcSn4dXnE

heowarner: hypocrite and brainless: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTHQ1ROv7MU

theowarner: incompetent, shallow-minded idiot: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrZ714ZL0q8

theowarner thinks it's reasonable for Christians to be unreasonable: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2I1NK-zvRo

theowarner lies about drcraigvideos and William Lane Craig: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIQj7cpO7OU

Hating William Lane Craig and his defenders: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PEJOdZdWDec

theowarner lies about the Bible: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jo3CkLad2bc

theowarner lacks common sense (and doesn't know his history): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnTpKa00N8Y

theowarner believes the matter in his shoe ALWAYS existed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W1R6AnN6dg

theowarner lies about Bart Ehrman (to drcraigvideos): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_iLbFncssM

Theowarner Explains How To Indoctrinate Children: "No sharing the Bible with Children!": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j34NRZzYbfw

Theowarner likes to lie about William Lane Craig: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiAckaYuvmE

Irrational Youtube Users on the Cosmological Argument ("Isn't it true that nothing began to exist?"): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnpa_kQaCgA

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• theowarner
• william
• lane
• craig
• rationalresponseguy
• drcraigvideos
• bibleapologetics
• SetonsH4ll

[theowarner]

@rationalresponseguy

Speaking of unnecessary repetition, you're just repeating yourself. You're adding nothing precisely because you consistently refuse to discuss the issues. You've claimed I've lied. If ask you about that, you'll just post a video. And in the comments section of that video, there will be a comment in which I've explained your error and in response to which you will have just insulted me. That's your idea of discourse. An insult.

So, let's not talk about "un-serious."

[rationalresponseguy]

@theowarner Well, your studies on William Lane Craig tend to be very un-serious let alone weak and full of lies. The fact that you think he's published very little on theology and philosophy shows that you have more fat in your head than brains. There are no square circles, theo. Just keep repeating that to yourself, ok?

[theowarner]

@SetonsH4ll

@SetonsH4ll

It's funny that your objection to me begs the very thesis I'm presenting. You say Craig only "seriously publishes theology, philosophy." I say: he publishes very little serious theology/philosophy. Most of what he does is evangelize and he also spends a great deal of his time and energy functioning as a religious leader.

So, that's what I'm talking about. What are you talking about?

[SetonsH4ll]

How can you demand an argument when this strife is about your unwillingness to do so? Look in the mirror theo. You've made an entire series against a man who really only seriously publishes theology, philosophy and you've nit picked at nothing more than utterly irrelevant topics and semantics; then, in ignorant self-congratulation, you demand that we respond to your idiocy. Absolutely ridiculous. And no, theo, I do not poison wells, endorse liberalism or would ever be caught in your shoes.

[theowarner]

@rationalresponseguy

So... again, no substantive comment. Again, again, and again.

[rationalresponseguy]

@theowarner Actually, theo. Just keep doing what you're doing. You're giving me loads of gas for the fire. It's bad enough you think you're a good thinker, but what's worse is you're letting everybody know how dumb you are, and you're doing it publicly! Thanks. There are no square circles, theo.

[theowarner]

@SetonsH4ll

So you think that rationalresponseguy is joking when he asks me "to clean up" my act?

Speaking of "convenient and cowardly," if you see "little logic" and "deplorably liberal statements," you should step up and become part of the conversation... instead of just posting these kinds of statements.

Engage. Discuss. I here and I'm waiting.

I'll add that you and rationalresponseguy strike me as victims of your own criticisms.

[SetonsH4ll]

And you? You take just as many, if not more shots at people, Christians included, on youtube. Then, you say that people can't take a joke if people ask you to clean up your act. Its a very convenient and cowardly way of getting people to ignore what little logic is contained in your deplorably liberal sentiments. This newest series about Craig is but a shining spectacle of such idiocy; not one argument addressed or legitimate topic considered, only vague ridicule and well poisoning. Childish.

[theowarner]

@rationalresponseguy

No, you're not following the conversation. You were asked why you are so insulting and rude. And you said that it was funny to you and that you enjoy messing with me. I'm asking you if humor and your own entertainment are why you make videos, should we take your seriously? Or are you also trying to be taken seriously?

[rationalresponseguy]

@theowarner So, when I make videos where I expose your embarrassingly bad and shallow arguments, that means people should not take me seriously? Well, I can see why you're trying to make people look like fools (especially when they refute your silly arguments), but you only have yourself to blame, theo. Sorry, but when you say something that's totally false it's not their fault but yours. I mean, square circles? C'mon, dude.