Barbara Boxer Laments Partisanship During Day 1 of Climate Change Hearings

more at cspan.org, October 27, 2009

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• senate
• senator
• barbara
• boxer
• partisanship
• bipartisanship
• climate
• change
• hearings
• global
• warming
• john
• warner
• republicans

[carrierexchange]

clearly, you have no clue

[LeGioNoFZioN]

and the socialists in Beijing and Moscow became capitalists ... so what is this world coming to ?

[mvbeckril]

All she needs now is a bunch of piercings and tats. What a disgrace she is.....

[tj5555555]

c-ge read above comment to support you ailing friend J-17. tj

[tj5555555]

J-17 : the numbers quoted back to you come from your own comment above stating 1/3 of the 30,000+ scientists had Phd's. If you are unable to apply continuity to your own words you lead to arguing with yourself. Check your own post above. As for my age,12 or 15, i am old enough to see through your forgetfulness as probably a sign of dementia. tj ( see your own comment 1 day ago and 17 comments above this comment and see where the 10,000 figure comes from, YOU , J-17) who's your daddy now? tj

[carrierexchange]

Kid turn off the internet, you are clearly out of your league.

[JBeatty17]

First you pull "10,000 scientists" with PhD's out of your ass, and now you are denigrating education and advancement? What a joke. How are are you again? I think you've told me before, but I can't recall if it was 12 or 15.

[JBeatty17]

That's what I thought. Numbers pulled straight from your ass. 10,000? Really? You couldn't be a little more creative with your bullshit numbers, like maybe 9,654 or some other number? Nope, the best you could do was 10,000 on the nose. What are the odds?

[tj5555555]

C-ge: by the way , do you know what those degrees really mean? BS= bull s---, MS= more of the same, Phd= piled higher & deeper. By the way , my life of education hasn't hurt me none. tj

[tj5555555]

c-ge: don't be suprised to find such a "wise" man in a very hot spot for eternity, and that will give new meaning to this global warning issue for him & you. tj

[tj5555555]

J-17 : 10,000 is 1/3 of the # presented above. And how many actual Phd scientists is that 96% of your's represent? Try 500. That still leaves you down by 9,500 scientists. Seems you Libs are holding the small cards in this poker game. tj

[JBeatty17]

"50 UN associated scientists?" Try 96% of the scientists belonging to the NAS. By the way, 10,000 is pretty abstract. Seems like a number you pulled out of your ass. Why am I not surprised?