Termination based on DNA
TCC Global ( Craig Richardson of Houston, Tx )
New Texas Law - 2011
Senate Bill 785 has passed through both the House and Senate and was sent to the Governor for signature on April 20th, 2011. This bill will Amend the Family Code and allow the termination of an order establishing a Dad based on the results of genetic testing that excludes that Dad as the child's genetic father. This new law should take effect September 1st, 2011.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Section 161.005 (Termination When Parent Is Petitioner), Family Code, provides that a parent may file a suit for termination of the parent-child relationship, and a court may order termination if the termination is in the best interest of the child; however, there are no provisions dealing with situations in which a father has mistakenly signed an acknowledgment of paternity or has been adjudicated as the father of a child. The father would be required to continue paying child support even if genetic testing proved that he could not be the father of the child.
S.B. 785 provides a way for a man who has either signed an acknowledgement of paternity or is adjudicated to be the father of a child without obtaining genetic testing to have the parent-child relationship terminated. The petition for termination must be verified and state that the petitioner is not the child's father, and that he had mistaken belief of paternity based on misrepresentations when he either signed the acknowledgement of paternity or when the court order was rendered.
The man may not file a petition for termination if he is the child's adoptive father, the child was conceived by assisted reproduction that was consented to by the man, or the man is the intended father under a court-approved gestational agreement.
A petition for termination must be filed not later than one year after the man becomes aware that he is not the father. The provision takes effect on September 1, 2012. Between the effective date of the bill and September 1, 2012, any man may bring a petition under the bill without regard to when the man learned that the child was not his biological child.
If the man establishes a meritorious prima facie case for termination, the court orders genetic testing. The result of the genetic testing then determines the outcome of the case.
This bill provides that if the parent-child relationship is terminated, the man may no longer be required to pay child support in the future; however, the termination does not affect the child support obligations already accrued prior to termination, nor does it affect the accrual of interest on any back child support owed.
If another man is determined to be the father of the child, that man may not be ordered to pay retroactive child support for any period of time preceding the date on which an order terminating another man's parent-child relationship is entered.
This bill provides that a man seeking to terminate a parent-child relationship may also petition the court to continue to allow him rights of possession and access to the child. If possession and access is granted, the court may require any party to participate in counseling with a mental health professional.
S.B. 785 amends current law relating to the termination of the parent-child relationship and the duty to pay child support in circumstances involving mistaken paternity.
Click here to veiw bill:
http://www.fathers4kids.com/CGAssets/assets/611.pdf
Loading...
2:40
Child Support Enforcement and Contempt of Courtby attorneymcclure3,054 views
You are so right jimmy
apostlereese 3 weeks ago
@Mirandachy WRONG! You are the one that makes the "only choice". A man can't make you take the pill. A man can't force you to to have an abortion. Then you decide "hey I want to keep the baby" no matter what "he" wants. Then when all you 8th-9th grade level uneducated twats don't have a $1,000,000 dollar house & great job like you always told yourself you would. Thats when you run to the courts to get a free paycheck to add to your free welfare checks to spend on nails & at the bars
jimmywhitepride 1 month ago
The men should pay more than 50% of child support, they chose not to be in the kids life. I'm a single mom thats a full time student and works. Guys y'all have no fucking clue how hard it is. Her dad left when he found out I was prego. That was his choice. He helped make her so he needs to help support her.
Mirandachy 1 month ago
@azkeyz @angol42 IF THE WOMAN HAS 100% CUSTODY OF THE CHILD where they are together as a family but the man is OUT THE DOOR, THEN WHY SHOULD THE MAN HAVE TO PAY 50% OF CHILD SUPPORT when he does NOT live with them and is not part of the family? MEN SHOULD NOT PAY ANY AMOUNT TOWARDS CHILD SUPPORT IF HE DOESN'T HAVE CUSTODY.Women who have 100% custody of a child SHOULD PAY 100% OF ALL EXPENSES towards the child. Being a dad but NOT having custody of the child is NOT BEING PART OF THE FAMILY.
domram12 2 months ago
Child support enforcement is striking fear into the public so much that soon no one will want kids becasue of the job situation and how easy it it for mothers to divorce and screw the good fathers out of there lives.
getalife67 3 months ago
Tx. will be the 5th state in the union that even allows men to get off hook when DNA proves they r not the father. What r other 45 states waiting for? They want someone on the hook even if it is the wrong man. Can u imagine how women would scream if they had to pay child support on a child that wasn't theirs? Cosmo magazine '92 said 25% of all women give up their children. No stats on how many men have those kids but still send support checks 2 moms who gave them up.
MLJ1219 7 months ago
Nope all this is BS , here's how it's going to be from now on , child support system are terrorists , and americans kill terrorists.
welcome to the new america where when you start shit , you get shanked.
azkeyz 7 months ago