@Dreez76 I own one as my home computer speaker system. I am very happy with the neat all in one package for what i need. From my Gaming Rig i run Toslink straight into the Yamaha AVR which has a 24Bit 96khz Burr-Brown DAC. Which then powers my Denon BookShelf Speakers. It is an excellent CHEAP solution for great audio. It is far superior than you think.
@Neojhun Which is exactly why i will never own anything from Yamahey, they don't have any soul. I'm currently powering my Dali 6006 with a Kenwood amp from 76, meanwhile chasing a Marantz PM-64 mk2, then upgrade again towards a NAD 218THX.
But my final goal is either Macintosh or a Tube-amp.
A friend of mine has a really powerful Cinematic amp from Yamahey, but that one never even come close to bringing music alive, not even to my Kenwood a`la 1976.
@Dreez76 Yamaha are consumer gread technology. They're production lines are more geared towards mass production and efficiency. What Yamaha is trying to do is reverse that idea and emphasize of refinement. But in the end they have no experience in that area.
NAD, Macintosh, Krell, Marantz.. that's real power. NAD if you want somewhat cheap but pure power and don't care about looks. Krell or Macintosh if you got the money. Marantz is good allround... Yamahey got nothing.
i was a fans till i bought one yamaha rxv 1900 REALLLY UNDER POWER when it sais 130W hahaha well really at 7 channel it play around 75 watts 2 channel it play around 110W i have 2 areceiver in the same room and my under one is nad and it sais that it play around 80W all speaker driven but it jump up to 130 140 sometime love my nad"D
@Dreez76 You need to learn more about this stuff i see, haha. Good ur happy with ur shit kenwood :)
Haziza87 1 month ago
@Dreez76 Haha Marantz, isn't any value for the money at all.
Haziza87 1 month ago
@Neojhun Haha
Haziza87 1 month ago
@Dreez76 I own one as my home computer speaker system. I am very happy with the neat all in one package for what i need. From my Gaming Rig i run Toslink straight into the Yamaha AVR which has a 24Bit 96khz Burr-Brown DAC. Which then powers my Denon BookShelf Speakers. It is an excellent CHEAP solution for great audio. It is far superior than you think.
Neojhun 1 month ago
@Neojhun Which is exactly why i will never own anything from Yamahey, they don't have any soul. I'm currently powering my Dali 6006 with a Kenwood amp from 76, meanwhile chasing a Marantz PM-64 mk2, then upgrade again towards a NAD 218THX.
But my final goal is either Macintosh or a Tube-amp.
A friend of mine has a really powerful Cinematic amp from Yamahey, but that one never even come close to bringing music alive, not even to my Kenwood a`la 1976.
Dreez76 1 month ago
@Dreez76 Yamaha are consumer gread technology. They're production lines are more geared towards mass production and efficiency. What Yamaha is trying to do is reverse that idea and emphasize of refinement. But in the end they have no experience in that area.
Neojhun 1 month ago
Yamahey never could build decent Amps.
NAD, Macintosh, Krell, Marantz.. that's real power. NAD if you want somewhat cheap but pure power and don't care about looks. Krell or Macintosh if you got the money. Marantz is good allround... Yamahey got nothing.
Dreez76 2 months ago
I have to agree.. I have a RX-A1000 Aventage 7.2 and so far I am underwhelmed.
This can't right, but it seems the network functions are WIRED only? REALLY YAMAHA...WIRED ONLY?
My Yamaha HTR-5590 will kick it's ass power wise.
Indogyearsimdead 3 months ago
@Penyser sorry what?
JMaldonado64 5 months ago
i was a fans till i bought one yamaha rxv 1900 REALLLY UNDER POWER when it sais 130W hahaha well really at 7 channel it play around 75 watts 2 channel it play around 110W i have 2 areceiver in the same room and my under one is nad and it sais that it play around 80W all speaker driven but it jump up to 130 140 sometime love my nad"D
SansuiAu717 7 months ago