Transatlantic trade talks in sight

http://www.euronews.com/ The European Union and the United States have agreed to talks on a free trade alliance.

European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said they should be able to start discussions by the end of June on bringing down trading barriers.

It would be the most ambitious free trade deal ever attempted, encompassing half the world's economic output and a third of global trade flows.

Barroso told a news conference: "A future deal between the world's two most important economic powers will be a game changer. Together, we will form the largest free trade zone in the world. So this negotiation will set a standard, not only for our future bilateral trade and investment, including regulatory issues, but also for development of global trade rules."

He spoke after President Barack Obama announced US support for the idea during his annual State of the Union address to Congress.

*Tough talks ahead*

The EU estimates such an agreement would boost its annual GDP growth by half a percent, however
the EU Trade Commissioner Karel De Gucht warned the talks will be tough.

Import tariffs between the two are already low - at an average of four percent.

Negotiations will focus on harmonising standards, from car seat belts to household cleaning products, and regulations governing services.

Ideally, De Gucht said, the negotiations should be wrapped up in two years.

Before talks can start, the US Congress must be notified and the European Commission needs approval from EU member states. It will present draft negotiating directives in March, no doubt prompting debate.

*How they gonna see this down on the farm?*

One of the key sticking points is likely to be agriculture.

When a transatlantic trade deal was suggested in 1998, it was shot down by France, which feared the European Union could be forced into concessions on agricultural trade.

The United States has long been frustrated with EU restrictions on US farm products such as genetically modified (GMO) crops, poultry treated with chlorine washes and meat from animals fed with the growth stimulant ractopamine.

In an early sign of EU reticence, Barroso said the negotiations would not compromise consumer health.

"We will not negotiate changes that we do not want of the basic rules on either side, be it on hormones or GMOs," he said.

The United States does not want a repeat of the Doha round of world trade talks, which began in 2001 and have never come to a conclusion.

Find us on:
Youtube http://bit.ly/zr3upY
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/euronews.fans
Twitter http://twitter.com/euronews

• Category

  News & Politics

[rafalpilat145]

yep.mine too. :D

[Uhmu45]

I am eating them, but hat has that to do with free trade?

[Alexander Ioannidis]

what about your health? eating genetically modified food ?

[Julius Caesar]

Dude, just because unemployment rate in Canada is lower than in U.S, doesnt mean that free trade was beneficial for Canada. The reason for that is because America`s population is much 10x higher & Canada managed to hire alot of people in the public sector. Free trade can cause the private sector of a country to shrink, forcing the government to employ the jobless in the public sector, but because less private business=less tax sources, the income of those public workers would reduce in a cycle

[C ani]

The target list? The strongest consumer and environmental policies on either side of the Atlantic. U.S. firms want Europe to gut their superior chemical regulation regime, their tougher food safety rules and labeling of genetically modified foods and their tougher climate policies. European firms are targeting aspects of the U.S. financial reregulation regime, our stronger drug and medical device safety and testing standards and more.

Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch

[C ani]

And, that Trans-Atlantic FTA? That's the pet project of the Trans-Atlantic Business Dialogue a club of financial, agribusiness, pharmaceutical, chemical and other U.S. and European multinationals. TAFTA's focus would not be trade per se - border taxes (tariffs) are already low. Rather, these talks are aimed at eliminating a list of what multinational corporations call "trade irritants" but the rest of us know as strong food safety, environmental and health safeguards.

[DarknesSoldier]

Yeah, 1970s. I guess people don't change right? You know being a young adult and all. Still not that experienced, or educated.

Still, you didn't answer my question:

So, which policies could be described as 'communistic' or 'maoist' that Barroso enacted?