Top Comments
All Comments (1,576)
-
It's funny to say Weiland's voice sucks. If you can't appreciate his voice, then you'll probably hate any hard rock or metal band...Scott Weiland has one of the greatest voices in rock...atleast in the top ten. Not a 'huge' fan of STP or anything, but even I can appreciate how talented this guy is. He is a SINGER in the rock genre, a true talent, despite his demons, the guy is amazing.
-
holy fucking shit this kicks so much fucking ass
-
Scott's moves ruled slash's solo!
-
@Spacefreak33 you're mom failed by giving birth to you
-
@Spacefreak33 you're an idiot
-
Ok that is not slash... Thats a poser... Fail douches
-
@AppetiteFDestruction Matt Bellamy sounds the same, and Billy Joe Armstrong. ._.
-
Matt Sorum is a pretty fucking awesome drummer
-
my mind is YEAHHHH
-
@MrTufflong If anybody,it was definitely Layne. He's the man! He always sounded like the studio version, before 1996 of course. He could still sing great, but he couldn't sustain the higher notes like he did about 3 years before. You could even tell, his voice was starting to go in late 1993, probably from not giving it a rest. They toured for years nonstop, until their hiatus.
Stop complaining about his singing, if you didn't know - singing rock songs is actually pretty fucking hard stuff! Scott has a great and strong voice actually, every singer is shaky sometimes, no one sounds exactly like on their recordings
AppetiteFDestruction 6 months ago 25
if scott was such a bad singer... HE WOULDNT HAVE HEADLINED WORLD FAMOUS ROCK BANDS. He has a distinct voice and maybe its not for everyone but he doesnt "SUCK". THE OTHER OBVIOUS i could mention is that NO CD RECORDING ever sounds like a live performance- they are edited and re edited a hundred times over... for a live performance this was pretty damn close to his recording... there are plenty of singers who SUCK- most likely the same people here who are criticzing Scott
fearmyvices 4 months ago 7