Quantum Entanglement Computers Can Not Work
Uploader Comments (RealInventor)
Video Responses
All Comments (169)
-
lol...
You are playing with wooden blocks and cardboard, is this some kind of joke or humour that doesnt come through, or do you seriously believe this to be a quantum mechanical experiment?
-
The experiment is no longer valid once you measure. Anyway, a block of wood cannot be entangled with another block of wood. Repeat your experiment with actual entangled electrons.
-
Blockhead.
-
The only thing missing is The Observer (Consciousness).
-
atoms can have a up spin and a down spin at the same time
-
Why is it that more people are inclined to vote this one down? I'm sure there are many reasons to be found by every person. I voted it down because he did not present a real experiment to prove his claim against quantum entanglement. Instead, he constructed an analogical depiction of what HE THINKS is going on with two entangled particles. Try this again sir, but this time use a real experiment to prove your point and not artifacts of representation!
-
Wooden blocks aren’t electrons, damn hippy.
-
@mrazrad People who UNDERSTAND this are the ones investing money in the research, not trolls like the OP.
it would be much better if have at least upload videos that deals with your own idea rather than proving what is wrong. and beg for fund. doesn't sound polite at all.
thewebxplorer 8 months ago
@thewebxplorer
I don't think there's anything wrong with trying to strive for truth in any subject. It would be more of a shame for people to keep wasting resources on faulty assumptions. They should at least spend the money on inventions that are going to help the world. I'm not sure why everyone is so angry about this post.
1.) It's a thought experiment - not a proof
2.) I'm simply pointing out an alternative way to interperet entang. experiment results.
Crimeny!
RealInventor 7 months ago
Nice video, but if you zap your first block and switch its state, the second block automatically switches its state regardless of the distance between them.
Your ill informed.
myrdale 2 years ago 7
"You're" ill informed.
myrdale 2 years ago 17
No, it doesn't. What you said was that a particle physically changes state based on the remote measurement of the state of its "entangled" counterpart. If this is what you think entanglement is, then I'm sorry you are ill informed. The popular description of QE is a remotely induced collapse of a wave-function, this is what you're trying to refer to, and I'm saying this interpretation may be wrong.
RealInventor 2 years ago
No, it doesn't. What you said was that a particle physically changes state based on the remote measurement of the state of its "entangled" counterpart. If this is what you think entanglement is, then I'm sorry you are ill informed. The popular description of QE is a remotely induced collapse of a wave-function, this is what you're trying to refer to, and I'm saying this interpretation may be wrong.
RealInventor 2 years ago