Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Quantum Entanglement Computers Can Not Work

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
11,469
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 22, 2008

Simple Experiment shows that quantum entanglement computations are impossible. Therefore the funding of such research is a waste of resources.

  • likes, 110 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (RealInventor)

  • it would be much better if have at least upload videos that deals with your own idea rather than proving what is wrong. and beg for fund. doesn't sound polite at all.

  • @thewebxplorer

    I don't think there's anything wrong with trying to strive for truth in any subject. It would be more of a shame for people to keep wasting resources on faulty assumptions. They should at least spend the money on inventions that are going to help the world. I'm not sure why everyone is so angry about this post.

    1.) It's a thought experiment - not a proof

    2.) I'm simply pointing out an alternative way to interperet entang. experiment results.

    Crimeny!

  • Nice video, but if you zap your first block and switch its state, the second block automatically switches its state regardless of the distance between them.

    Your ill informed.

  • "You're" ill informed.

  • No, it doesn't. What you said was that a particle physically changes state based on the remote measurement of the state of its "entangled" counterpart. If this is what you think entanglement is, then I'm sorry you are ill informed. The popular description of QE is a remotely induced collapse of a wave-function, this is what you're trying to refer to, and I'm saying this interpretation may be wrong.

  • No, it doesn't. What you said was that a particle physically changes state based on the remote measurement of the state of its "entangled" counterpart. If this is what you think entanglement is, then I'm sorry you are ill informed. The popular description of QE is a remotely induced collapse of a wave-function, this is what you're trying to refer to, and I'm saying this interpretation may be wrong.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Quantum Physics: Entanglement Part One
see all

All Comments (169)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • lol...

    You are playing with wooden blocks and cardboard, is this some kind of joke or humour that doesnt come through, or do you seriously believe this to be a quantum mechanical experiment?

  • The experiment is no longer valid once you measure. Anyway, a block of wood cannot be entangled with another block of wood. Repeat your experiment with actual entangled electrons.

  • Blockhead.

  • The only thing missing is The Observer (Consciousness).

  • atoms can have a up spin and a down spin at the same time

  • Why is it that more people are inclined to vote this one down? I'm sure there are many reasons to be found by every person. I voted it down because he did not present a real experiment to prove his claim against quantum entanglement. Instead, he constructed an analogical depiction of what HE THINKS is going on with two entangled particles. Try this again sir, but this time use a real experiment to prove your point and not artifacts of representation!

  • Wooden blocks aren’t electrons, damn hippy.

  • @mrazrad People who UNDERSTAND this are the ones investing money in the research, not trolls like the OP.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more