Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Quit your bitching, yes econ is hard in the upper levels, but it is something that cannot be tested very well in a large scale. Economics is a social science unlike physics and chemistry, no amount of math is going to change that, so deal with it.
There are very good reasons to blame central banking and public policy economists who are often no more than faulty justifications for government intervention and expansion. I'm talking macro though, micro econ is awesome.
Just because empirically-derived data is taken a crunched through a bunch of equations does not mean what you get out the other side is scientifically valid. To be valid, a scientific theory must be A) testable; it must posit things that can be substantiated or refuted with contrary evidence and B) it must be able to make predictions about future outcomes based on the theoretical models that have been established. Mainstream macroeconomics fails both of these tests.
First, because mainstream economic science fails to have any predictive value - all one has to do is look at the dotcom and housing bubbles to see the failure of "empirical" economic science. Number two, economics fails as an empirical science because in order to parrot the hard sciences it is forced to ignore subjective value. Human beings act to improve their lives based on the things they value. These values cannot be measured only in terms of money and are thus ignored by (most) economists.
yes they did create economics. how did economics happen? the rules of economy just happened? you make no sense. humans created a system where trade and commerce can flourish.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Quit your bitching, yes econ is hard in the upper levels, but it is something that cannot be tested very well in a large scale. Economics is a social science unlike physics and chemistry, no amount of math is going to change that, so deal with it.
There are very good reasons to blame central banking and public policy economists who are often no more than faulty justifications for government intervention and expansion. I'm talking macro though, micro econ is awesome.