Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Economics

The truth about economics  
 
Customize

More From: rowingengineer

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
68 ratings
Sign in to rate
33,374 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (84)   Options

Loading...
bobobano (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
the nobel prize for economics was added only because a bank started funding the prize
BlueSundew (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
true :3
Spanky00Cheeks (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Remember Frosh: Upon completion of Engineering Frosh Week, you all receive an honorary business degree!
Shadyhunter04 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
*Cough* Keynesian *Cough*

Quit your bitching, yes econ is hard in the upper levels, but it is something that cannot be tested very well in a large scale. Economics is a social science unlike physics and chemistry, no amount of math is going to change that, so deal with it.

There are very good reasons to blame central banking and public policy economists who are often no more than faulty justifications for government intervention and expansion. I'm talking macro though, micro econ is awesome.
solidysnake1 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 -8
Marked as spam
dadumbazz (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
So true. Not only do you make a good pay but you can also make big profit margins on the stock market making you get far more money each year.
gergenheimer (4 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
Just because empirically-derived data is taken a crunched through a bunch of equations does not mean what you get out the other side is scientifically valid. To be valid, a scientific theory must be A) testable; it must posit things that can be substantiated or refuted with contrary evidence and B) it must be able to make predictions about future outcomes based on the theoretical models that have been established. Mainstream macroeconomics fails both of these tests.
gergenheimer (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
First, because mainstream economic science fails to have any predictive value - all one has to do is look at the dotcom and housing bubbles to see the failure of "empirical" economic science. Number two, economics fails as an empirical science because in order to parrot the hard sciences it is forced to ignore subjective value. Human beings act to improve their lives based on the things they value. These values cannot be measured only in terms of money and are thus ignored by (most) economists.
scir91 (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
yes they did create economics. how did economics happen? the rules of economy just happened? you make no sense. humans created a system where trade and commerce can flourish.
ScavHC (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
how does it make any sense at all? "if economics were a science, then people would be more rich"?

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.