Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Busting Stupid Freeman & Sovereignty Myths

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,320
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 10, 2011

http://www.benlowrey.com creditors in commerce winston shrout jack smith gordon hall brandon adams robert menard accepted for value A4v john harris commercial redemption free man on the land ben lowrey bashar john demartini zeitgeist fractional reserve money debt fiat alex jones prison planet info wars project camelot TPUC Tim Turner Sam Davis Douglas Riddle Vince Kahn cveitch charlie veitch divine natural positive canon veronica chapman sovereign republic self determination dean clifford

  • likes, 22 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (benlowreyhimself)

  • The plain meaning rule: States that if a writing, or the term in question, appears to be plain and unambiguous on its face, its meaning must be determined from the four corners of the instrument

  • @RJL230779

    fantastic. i like those type of rules. that's the antithesis of stupid bullshit myths.

  • Senate Document No. 43, 73rd Congress, 1st Session, which states: "The ownership of all property is in the state; individual so-called 'ownership' is only by virtue of the government, i.e., law, amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the state."

  • @badaboomrock

    interesting thank you

  • @benlowreyhimself

    have you got bi polar disease young man ?

  • @MrSpankwangle

    "young man"? who the fuck are you.

    no i don't have bipolar disease old man.

Top Comments

  • Disappointing Ben. Generalisation, Stereotyping, Unfounded claims no evidence or backup offered to support your claims and/or statements. Who bunch? you lot who? are you just trying to be controversial? you've lowered your self here mate. not saying I disagree with you entirely.

  • I'm confused. I've watched vids of your interviews with the likes of Dean Clifford....are you now saying that these are complete nonsense? Will you be re-interviewing these people and challenging them to rebuke your claims? You welcome people to many of your vids with the words 'Hello Sovereigns"...it now feels like you're actually saying "Hello Idiots".

    This is meant with sincere care.

see all

All Comments (82)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Lawful: ANYTHING permitted by law i.e. under the constitution of/for the united states.

    Legal: The FORM of the law i.e. though the contract was to assassinate, it was still a contract.

    If you cannot see the difference, keep studying.

  • "shame on you for believing nonsense" How about shame on the millions and millions of people who believe in the authority of the state. Shame on them for enslaving me by virtue of their wilful ignorance. Shame on them for paying for war. Shame on you.

  • The only idea that I keep hearing about where people are getting remedy is "What Lies In Your Debt". No mortgage means no enslavement.Isn't that what we want?

    Then we can learn the name game,A4V,trusts,driving with no plates and the different types of courts and their rules and language.

    That's my 2 cents spent! :p

  • Also putting semi-colons and dashes in your name like "The-Proverbial; Hater" is total bullshit. Courts have smashed that down in 2 minutes. Freeman on the land is the most bullshit. When you make broad statements like "I'm a sovereign" you automatically lose because it is now your duty when there wasn't any prior to prove that you are in fact "Sovereign". Impossible to do because a judge will tell you with the quickness that is your opinion and bring back proof. Proof of burden people.

  • The Strawman is bullshit. I found that out the hard way, when they put me in a straight-jacket. Another retard logic is Common Law is that Constitution. It isn't because the legal fiction was made to the rigidness of Common Law. That would be in direct opposition of the Constitution. Also placing liens on judges is bullshit, because you can't charge people criminally for that is meant as "CIVIL" i.e. accepting and Oath of Office as a "CONTRACT". Those are 2 different venues. 

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more