Darwin VS Design DNA

Dr. Stephen C. Meyer discusses DNA and how it relates to Intelligent Design.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Intelligent
• Design
• Stephen
• Meyer
• Darwin
• DNA
• evolution
• charles

[confettibrains]

Creation hypothesis fails to properly explain facts such as shared ERV insertions between distinct but related species, 100% accurate predictions made by molecular phylogenetics, biogeography (where species are found in strata and locations at predicted evolutionary origins), fusion of 2 ape chromosomes into 1 human chromosome, human embryonic stages that show vestigial development as amphibians, or why ALL living species today can be traced back to an ancestor w/ NO completely novel organisms

[carlosZ1981]

I'm surprised more people don't think outside the box on this issue, the universal language in nature is mathematics, DNA is basically a biological machine that follows a pattern or code, yet nobody explores why? And if u do, u must be Some southern christian republican gun owner who wants kids in school to pray and o the Tebow pose before class begins, how childish! How is science going to progress if we don't explore other ideas and concepts? And god doesn't ave anything to do with ID, the

[bogdank100]

1. Darwin: transitional species determine the validity of gradual evolution. Of the millions of fossils unearthed, not ONE transitional form.

2. Punctuated Equilibrium is offered as a rebuttal: incredibly irreducibly complex structures appearing suddenly? Mathematically impossible (entropy?).

3. For the same reason people don't want to correct the horribly mistranslated King James Bible (historical and cultural inertia), modern scientists won't rethink evolution, their lives based on lies.

[theologix01]

Darwinism and the Theory of Evolution are not the same. The theory is what scientists argue for. Darwinism is a "strawman" that tends to ignore all the subsequent findings post Darwin. It's just like when some scientists call I'D theology. Theology and I'D are not the same. Darwinism is whatever opponents make it to be. ToE is science.

[RichtoffenRoach]

Why? Why keep fighting? Who cares if it is evolution or creation? You people are always fighting. Peace

[circusOFprecision]

@theologix01

The primary axiom of modern evolutionary theory is STILL based directly upon Darwinism. So...what exactly does downplaying that fact accomplish?

[RichtoffenRoach]

@theologix01 Darwinism means the same thing.

[theologix01]

Don't call it Darwinism. Call it the Theory of Evolution. Start by using the correct term.



[gregrutz]

@RussianPunch There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies on evolution, with full support from every related life science, including genetics. There has not been a single falsification to refute evolution in 150 years of relentless scrutiny!

It is the backbone of Biology, accepted by all scientists

[gregrutz]

@RussianPunch So if you uses some big words that makes you right?

The answer to you bull shit is easy >>> Evolution dun it. ''validate... materialism and atheism'' ?? Science does not care about religion and atheism or materialism.