case for a creator refuted part 1(fair use)

sub vote fave im getting lonely over here

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• case
• for
• creator

[Paxmax]

where is part 2?

[nailo1]

it got rejected it'll be up in a sec

[finchfrance]

Very interesting, 5 stars, and on to part 2

[nailo1]

thank you, i really am giving this project my full attention

[sonoftheking85]

@nailo1 In all honesty the movies would be a good compliment to the books but they lack serious substance when held in comparison to the books.

[sonoftheking85]

@nailo1 If you really are intrigued, I honestly sincerely invite you to read his books. They go into soooooooooooooo much further detail than the movies ever could and from what I recall, they provide references for everything. Movies are limited by budget and time constraints, there is so much that goes into a movie storie-wise too. I honestly think the movies are fascinating but the books are by far better written than any of the movies that are out.

[nailo1]

@sonoftheking85 he also give 2 completely different reasons for his conversion.

which wikipedia info are you talking about; the argument from ignorance part? he gives a BS excuse that he did not know anyway for.

to be honest with you i watch his movies hoping he was rigorous in his methodology. The biggest point was his case for christ when he mentions objections but only mentions one then dismisses it out right.