Dennis Prager, best-selling author and nationally syndicated radio talk show host, asks a fundamental question and comes up with an answer that may surprise both believers and non-believers.
Do you mind if I criticize your poor understanding of probability? From the most elementary viewpoint, Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, all things are possible, just not necessarily probable.
God gave people free will and that's how He limited Himself in His revelation to them. And the people by exercising that free will choose to block all the evidences ... So it's not that God can't prove Himself it's people, as apostle Peter said, "they are willingly ignorant of...", another words... "dumb on purpose". So that takes an omnipotent God to do so because He KNOWS that at the end NO ONE will be able to resist Him... by their own choice. Blessing.
Funny video. If god really can't prove his existence to us, then he's not omnipotent. And thus by Prager's reasoning God either doesn't exist, or is a very different kind of God than the one most people believe in.
I am a agnostic person, although I'm not so arrogant as to say I know for a fact there's no god(s), and I'm not completely opposed to the thought. I preferred to stick with hard facts of the world, things I can hold and observe.
Wow! You think the primordial soup theory is backed up by "substancial evidence". If you choose to have faith in a chemical creation spawned by an "unknown process", that's fine. But please, show some intelectual honesty and refrain from phrases like "God of the gaps".
Do you mind if I criticize your poor understanding of probability? From the most elementary viewpoint, Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, all things are possible, just not necessarily probable.
ArodienX 1 week ago
God gave people free will and that's how He limited Himself in His revelation to them. And the people by exercising that free will choose to block all the evidences ... So it's not that God can't prove Himself it's people, as apostle Peter said, "they are willingly ignorant of...", another words... "dumb on purpose". So that takes an omnipotent God to do so because He KNOWS that at the end NO ONE will be able to resist Him... by their own choice. Blessing.
vik72od 2 weeks ago
Funny video. If god really can't prove his existence to us, then he's not omnipotent. And thus by Prager's reasoning God either doesn't exist, or is a very different kind of God than the one most people believe in.
Garro2 3 weeks ago
" appear, hit the papers around the world" dude hit the internet...way faster
jokor77 1 month ago
@iwannabethekid34x
My comment has nothing to do with the video.
I didn't watch the video you're correct.
NefariousVirtuoso88 1 month ago
I am a agnostic person, although I'm not so arrogant as to say I know for a fact there's no god(s), and I'm not completely opposed to the thought. I preferred to stick with hard facts of the world, things I can hold and observe.
InFusing 1 month ago
@NefariousVirtuoso88 Looks like someone hasn't watched the video.
iwannabethekid34x 1 month ago
What would it take you to believe in magic flying spagetti monsters ?
NefariousVirtuoso88 1 month ago
@JonathanR1970
"I find Christian theology embarrassingly simplistic."
I find this comment embarrassingly arrogent.
gruvymon 1 month ago
@NewThinkful :
Wow! You think the primordial soup theory is backed up by "substancial evidence". If you choose to have faith in a chemical creation spawned by an "unknown process", that's fine. But please, show some intelectual honesty and refrain from phrases like "God of the gaps".
gruvymon 1 month ago