Brooks Kubik Push Press 137kg (302lb) DRUG FREE

Fragment from video "Brooks Kubik - Power Rack Training"
Brooks Kubik
Push Press
137kg (302lb)
DRUG FREE
Dinosaur Training

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• Brooks
• Kubik
• Push
• Press
• 137kg
• 302lb
• DRUG
• FREE
• Dinosaur
• Training

[wildanS]

Nah, his equipment might be old, but for sure not crappy. On the other hand you would find plenty of shiny crap in the "chrome and fern" land. ;)

[hasanimellabot]

Brooks is the man.

[ShaneSchomburg]

@9fifty5 no explode i hated it , i like super pump the best 

[Biggmofo]

Dude his homegym is oldskooler than oldskool. Hardcore!!!!

[9fifty5]

I own the Dinosaur Training book plus a bunch of his DVD's.

Brooks is a bit of a stiff, but if everyone trained according to the Dinosaur methodology, forums like T Nation and BB.com would become wastelands over night.

'So, what do you guys think about No Explode?'

'Dude, it like gives you a sick pump with concentration curls'

[hmldjr]

good job, brooks

[azzaMCrazza]

@heathdwatts I think he owes us all about a thousand dollars

[heathdwatts]

@MrRockhardman Scientists can falsify data, but they'll be caught & their careers will end. When I write a paper (I'm a computational chemist), I may have a wonderful pet hypothesis that my results kill, but the death of a pet hypothesis usually makes me happy. Discovering how the world actually works is why scientists do science; if I wanted money, I would have been an investment banker. :)

I'm glad you're skeptical about supplements. Joe Weider took plenty of my money when I was a teenager.

[MrRockhardman]

@heathdwatts Even scientific articles can be swayed by the right dollar amount. it's an old but much used way to "adjust" information. Yes, there are many crap supplements, but... there are good ones also. I spent many years being my own guinea pig, so anything I use now has come from quite a few years of trial and error. I trust what I take and I highly doubt it's placebo because i went into it as skeptical as you or Brooks.

[heathdwatts]

@MrRockhardman I'm not sure what you mean by "fixed". The articles that I directed you to are not Google articles, but actual peer-reviewed articles from various scientific journals. Either a supplement works, or it does not. Although you may be correct that the supplements that you are using are effective, your personal evidence may be biased in some way (placebo effect, etc.) and personal evidence has no bearing on phenomena that are testable.

[MrRockhardman]

@heathdwatts the FDA isn't all of what it's proclaimed to be, but nonetheless I don't go by google articles that provide research information on studies that are "fixed". I go by personal experience and I only use 2 or 3 companies that have been around for a long time and are reputable. Not all of them are bad. 90% of them yes, but not all of them. And no, I don't go by claims, I go by results that I have experienced firsthand and by other people that I know. To each his own.

[heathdwatts]

@MrRockhardman Nutritional supplement makers are not regulated (but should be) by the FDA and can make any claim they like. If you search Google Scholar, you'll find many peer-reviewed articles that suggest that most supplements are no better than placebos. Creatine monohydrate and whey protein may be useful, but the results of the studies I've seen are often contradictory.